Started By
Message
locked post

Actual headline today: Why Restrict Child Porn but not Guns?

Posted on 6/8/22 at 11:04 am
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 6/8/22 at 11:04 am


Chicago Sun Times

Not going to read the article, but that may be the most absurd article headline I’ve ever seen.
This post was edited on 6/8/22 at 11:05 am
Posted by oVo
Member since Dec 2013
11983 posts
Posted on 6/8/22 at 11:06 am to
Someone needs to beat the shite out of this guy
Posted by TheOrgeronTrail
St. George - God's Country
Member since Aug 2019
166 posts
Posted on 6/8/22 at 11:06 am to
Neil Steinberg is for sure a kiddie diddler
Posted by bubbaprohn
Kansas
Member since Feb 2009
4155 posts
Posted on 6/8/22 at 11:07 am to
I'd bet my life on the fact that a child has a bigger chance of being molested/used for CP than being shot in a mass shooting at school. His "far worse danger" is actually backwards.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138917 posts
Posted on 6/8/22 at 11:07 am to
Why should we restrict material that sexually exploits children?

These people are grooming kids no matter who tells you otherwise.

Of course, nevermind the fact that there are tons of restrictions on guns.

Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
134627 posts
Posted on 6/8/22 at 11:07 am to
Because we obviously need the guns to shoot the kiddie diddlers in the head

This post was edited on 6/8/22 at 11:09 am
Posted by Honest Tune
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2011
19285 posts
Posted on 6/8/22 at 11:07 am to
They’re not even trying to hide it anymore.
Posted by PureBlood
The Motherland
Member since Oct 2021
5021 posts
Posted on 6/8/22 at 11:07 am to
Exhibit #919038949302918403829 of a liberal being retarded
Posted by Tempratt
Member since Oct 2013
15195 posts
Posted on 6/8/22 at 11:08 am to
Spoken like a true democrat/pedophile/ liberal.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 6/8/22 at 11:09 am to
quote:

Exhibit #919038949302918403829 of a liberal being retarded


There comes a line crossing between retarded and intentional evil.
Posted by TigerOnTheMountain
Higher Elevation
Member since Oct 2014
41773 posts
Posted on 6/8/22 at 11:09 am to
OweO, Bronc, The Spleen, HHTM, texridder, are all wondering the same thing.

Sorry to those groomers I forgot.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 6/8/22 at 11:10 am to
quote:

The fact you felt comfortable tweeting this let’s me know we should probably check your hard drives.


Posted by PureBlood
The Motherland
Member since Oct 2021
5021 posts
Posted on 6/8/22 at 11:10 am to
quote:

There comes a line crossing between retarded and intentional evil.




1000000)%


They crossed the line back when they started lynching black folk.
Posted by The Third Leg
Idiot Out Wandering Around
Member since May 2014
12629 posts
Posted on 6/8/22 at 11:10 am to
The satire of today is the reality of tomorrow.
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
88184 posts
Posted on 6/8/22 at 11:10 am to
quote:

Actual headline


Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
76262 posts
Posted on 6/8/22 at 11:11 am to
this part sounds like he's against child porn.

quote:

"Why does child pornography merit such a unique level of suppression? I’ll give you a hint: it’s called “child pornography.” Children cannot consent to sexual acts with adults and are severely damaged by being forced to do so. Child pornography hurts children, so we fight it with all the legal might our nation can bring to bear, even if it infringes on fundamental freedoms."


this part not so much

quote:

"To summarize: an essential part of the Constitution gives Americans a right, but that right is limited when the free exercise of it harms children.

So why all the trouble with guns? Why does a logic universally accepted regarding the First Amendment completely fall apart when we get to the Second? The harm to children from guns far exceeds the harm done by child pornography."
This post was edited on 6/8/22 at 2:53 pm
Posted by chryso
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
13751 posts
Posted on 6/8/22 at 11:11 am to
Can anyone explain to me how child porn could be used for good purposes? I can't think of any.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
134627 posts
Posted on 6/8/22 at 11:13 am to
quote:

Can anyone explain to me how child porn could be used for good purposes?



Helping Biden and other politicians get erections?
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138917 posts
Posted on 6/8/22 at 11:13 am to
quote:

So why all the trouble with guns? Why does a logic universally accepted regarding the First Amendment completely fall apart when we get to the Second? The harm to children from guns far exceeds the harm done by child pornography.

My God

This is the absolute most disingenuous article I've seen in a while.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299335 posts
Posted on 6/8/22 at 11:16 am to
I imagine he's more upset about the lack of child porn than the availability of guins.

His own city "LIMITS" firearms.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram