Started By
Message

re: According to my Yankee Boss and co-worker... slaves had it made...

Posted on 8/1/19 at 12:30 pm to
Posted by tigersownall
Thibodaux
Member since Sep 2011
17202 posts
Posted on 8/1/19 at 12:30 pm to
I’m from the south. Your boss is not wrong. Not every slave owner was roots and Django
This post was edited on 8/1/19 at 5:49 pm
Posted by stratman
NOLA
Member since Apr 2013
977 posts
Posted on 8/1/19 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

Trying to minimize the extent of people in the pre-war South owned or used slaves is an exercise in futility.


You are right, but maximizing it for effect to imply that the entirety of the American South were slave owners is disingenuous and misleading. I don't think that anything but the facts serve any good purpose. I never heard of "renting a slave", but I'm quite positive that it occurred on a daily basis.

With the truth may come scarring, but with scarring comes the healing.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
135028 posts
Posted on 8/1/19 at 1:39 pm to
You don’t see the difference in discussing broad historical subjects in context, and comparing them to similar events throughout history and having a scholarly discussion about them...as compared to a recent grisly murder of a college girl?

And if you had to choose between being shot to death and burning to death i’d Take the shooting. But is that really relevant to the conversation?
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 8/1/19 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

I would say the majority of slaves had equal to or better lives than the Irish, Italians, and eastern europeans who came over in the 1800s to work in factories in the north. Long hours in dangerous conditions where you got paid a pittance. Slaves probably cost their owners more money than the small wage northern business men paid their workers.


Wow.

Some of the takes in here are just white hot.
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 8/1/19 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

but maximizing it for effect to imply that the entirety of the American South were slave owners is disingenuous and misleading.



Nobody in this thread has done that. Several posts have pointed out that between 20-50% of Southern households owned slaves to counter one poster's claim that the number was only 4%.

Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
135028 posts
Posted on 8/1/19 at 1:58 pm to
It was literally cheaper to pay the potato-eaters pennies a day and work them to death than to use slaves. You didn’t know this?

If there is a finite resource, it is more valuable.

Meanwhile more Irish came off the boats every day
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 8/1/19 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

It was literally cheaper to pay the potato-eaters pennies a day and work them to death than to use slaves. You didn’t know this?

If there is a finite resource, it is more valuable.

Meanwhile more Irish came off the boats every day




The Irish were free and came willingly. Even with their social conditions, to say that antebellum slaves had equal or better lives than any free person is silly.

The Irish came knowing it'd be tough but that their hard work would ultimately pay off through the experiences their children would have.

Slaves had children and those children could be taken and sold off without notice, never to be seen again.
Posted by LB84
Member since May 2016
4588 posts
Posted on 8/1/19 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

The Irish were free and came willingly. Even with their social conditions, to say that antebellum slaves had equal or better lives than any free person is silly. The Irish came knowing it'd be tough but that their hard work would ultimately pay off through the experiences their children would have. Slaves had children and those children could be taken and sold off without notice, never to be seen again.


Starve to death in Ireland under British rule or go to America or some other far away land to be treated as slave labor. Yeah so, SO much better than being a slave.

Like I said both are bad but I'd rather be seen as a valuable asset over a cheap worker I can replace easily. Paying hundreds of dollars for a slave means you'll likely take care of that slave so you can get the most out of him. An immigrant you can pay pennies to can easily be replaced by another immigrant because all you are doing is moving his wage to another person.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 8/1/19 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

Like I said both are bad but I'd rather be seen as a valuable asset over a cheap worker I can replace easily. Paying hundreds of dollars for a slave means you'll likely take care of that slave so you can get the most out of him. An immigrant you can pay pennies to can easily be replaced by another immigrant because all you are doing is moving his wage to another person.


Today, I witnessed someone in 2019 say they'd rather be a slave than an immigrant.
Posted by LB84
Member since May 2016
4588 posts
Posted on 8/1/19 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

Today, I witnessed someone in 2019 say they'd rather be a slave than an immigrant.


Lol talk about picking words. Nice way to remove the context of the conversation.


What you said is the equivalent of this.

"Only black people had hard lives in the 1850s. All people of European descent had it very easy."

Do you truly believe that?
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 8/1/19 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

What you said is the equivalent of this.

"Only black people had hard lives in the 1850s. All people of European descent had it very easy."


That isn't at all what I said.

But keep telling us about how slavery wasn't that terrible in the grand scheme of things.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
135028 posts
Posted on 8/1/19 at 2:29 pm to
I’m just saying that the dagos and the micks were less valuable than slaves and could be worked to death with little care.

They used them for jobs they wouldn’t use slaves on.

But my point is, slave or free, their descendents are better off for the hardship their ancestors had to endure.

Posted by NATidefan
Two hours North of Birmingham
Member since Dec 2008
36788 posts
Posted on 8/1/19 at 2:34 pm to
quote:


But my point is, slave or free, their descendents are better off for the hardship their ancestors had to endure. 


For the slaves, that's only because slavery ended.

And I'm pretty sure they didnt sign up for it with the notion that it was going to.

This post was edited on 8/1/19 at 2:37 pm
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
135028 posts
Posted on 8/1/19 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

For the slaves, that's only because slavery ended. And I'm pretty sure they didnt sign up for it with the notion that it was going to.


Just how dense are you? I never said that anyone signed up for hardship.

You think the Irish signed up to starve to death from famine?

The point I am making is that regardless of how shitty the conditions were in the past, coming to America, in any way, immensely benefitted their offspring down the line and their diaspora
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21240 posts
Posted on 8/1/19 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

Just how dense are you? I never said that anyone signed up for hardship. You think the Irish signed up to starve to death from famine? The point I am making is that regardless of how shitty the conditions were in the past, coming to America, in any way, immensely benefitted their offspring down the line and their diaspora


Some will never get it. They will continue to think their ancestors had it worse than any other people before or after them. Yep, no disputing it was horrible. You have to wonder what this country would have been like without slavery? How would those that were slaves turned out in Africa? How would our country have turned out? Serious questions.
This post was edited on 8/1/19 at 4:12 pm
Posted by NATidefan
Two hours North of Birmingham
Member since Dec 2008
36788 posts
Posted on 8/1/19 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

 I never said that anyone signed up for hardship. 


I never said you did.

I was pointing out that the Irish signed up to come to America with hopes of bettering themselves.

The situation was not the same for slaves.

Just because it ended well in your opinion doesnt mean anything.

It's about the the fact that one group had the choice and the other didn't.

Yes, we all know your point is slaves descendants ended up better off than if they had stayed in Africa. Whoopty doo. That's not the fricking point.

This post was edited on 8/1/19 at 3:34 pm
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92903 posts
Posted on 8/1/19 at 3:33 pm to
They are correct
Posted by NATidefan
Two hours North of Birmingham
Member since Dec 2008
36788 posts
Posted on 8/1/19 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

They are correct


About what exactly?

Cause if it's about my life being the same as a slaves I would love to hear that one explained.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
70176 posts
Posted on 8/1/19 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

Yes, we all know your point is slaves descendants ended up better off than if they had stayed in Africa. Whoopty doo.


yeh why would you want to look on the bright side...hard to stay angry if you do
This post was edited on 8/1/19 at 3:46 pm
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21240 posts
Posted on 8/1/19 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

yeh why would you want to look on the bright side...hard to stay angry if you do


Seems to always be the case...
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram