- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/1/19 at 1:36 pm to Obtuse1
quote:
Trying to minimize the extent of people in the pre-war South owned or used slaves is an exercise in futility.
You are right, but maximizing it for effect to imply that the entirety of the American South were slave owners is disingenuous and misleading. I don't think that anything but the facts serve any good purpose. I never heard of "renting a slave", but I'm quite positive that it occurred on a daily basis.
With the truth may come scarring, but with scarring comes the healing.
Posted on 8/1/19 at 1:39 pm to NATidefan
You don’t see the difference in discussing broad historical subjects in context, and comparing them to similar events throughout history and having a scholarly discussion about them...as compared to a recent grisly murder of a college girl?
And if you had to choose between being shot to death and burning to death i’d Take the shooting. But is that really relevant to the conversation?
And if you had to choose between being shot to death and burning to death i’d Take the shooting. But is that really relevant to the conversation?
Posted on 8/1/19 at 1:47 pm to LB84
quote:
I would say the majority of slaves had equal to or better lives than the Irish, Italians, and eastern europeans who came over in the 1800s to work in factories in the north. Long hours in dangerous conditions where you got paid a pittance. Slaves probably cost their owners more money than the small wage northern business men paid their workers.
Wow.
Some of the takes in here are just white hot.
Posted on 8/1/19 at 1:49 pm to stratman
quote:
but maximizing it for effect to imply that the entirety of the American South were slave owners is disingenuous and misleading.
Nobody in this thread has done that. Several posts have pointed out that between 20-50% of Southern households owned slaves to counter one poster's claim that the number was only 4%.
Posted on 8/1/19 at 1:58 pm to GetCocky11
It was literally cheaper to pay the potato-eaters pennies a day and work them to death than to use slaves. You didn’t know this?
If there is a finite resource, it is more valuable.
Meanwhile more Irish came off the boats every day
If there is a finite resource, it is more valuable.
Meanwhile more Irish came off the boats every day
Posted on 8/1/19 at 2:08 pm to fr33manator
quote:
It was literally cheaper to pay the potato-eaters pennies a day and work them to death than to use slaves. You didn’t know this?
If there is a finite resource, it is more valuable.
Meanwhile more Irish came off the boats every day
The Irish were free and came willingly. Even with their social conditions, to say that antebellum slaves had equal or better lives than any free person is silly.
The Irish came knowing it'd be tough but that their hard work would ultimately pay off through the experiences their children would have.
Slaves had children and those children could be taken and sold off without notice, never to be seen again.
Posted on 8/1/19 at 2:16 pm to GetCocky11
quote:
The Irish were free and came willingly. Even with their social conditions, to say that antebellum slaves had equal or better lives than any free person is silly. The Irish came knowing it'd be tough but that their hard work would ultimately pay off through the experiences their children would have. Slaves had children and those children could be taken and sold off without notice, never to be seen again.
Starve to death in Ireland under British rule or go to America or some other far away land to be treated as slave labor. Yeah so, SO much better than being a slave.
Like I said both are bad but I'd rather be seen as a valuable asset over a cheap worker I can replace easily. Paying hundreds of dollars for a slave means you'll likely take care of that slave so you can get the most out of him. An immigrant you can pay pennies to can easily be replaced by another immigrant because all you are doing is moving his wage to another person.
Posted on 8/1/19 at 2:18 pm to LB84
quote:
Like I said both are bad but I'd rather be seen as a valuable asset over a cheap worker I can replace easily. Paying hundreds of dollars for a slave means you'll likely take care of that slave so you can get the most out of him. An immigrant you can pay pennies to can easily be replaced by another immigrant because all you are doing is moving his wage to another person.
Today, I witnessed someone in 2019 say they'd rather be a slave than an immigrant.
Posted on 8/1/19 at 2:22 pm to GetCocky11
quote:
Today, I witnessed someone in 2019 say they'd rather be a slave than an immigrant.
Lol talk about picking words. Nice way to remove the context of the conversation.
What you said is the equivalent of this.
"Only black people had hard lives in the 1850s. All people of European descent had it very easy."
Do you truly believe that?
Posted on 8/1/19 at 2:25 pm to LB84
quote:
What you said is the equivalent of this.
"Only black people had hard lives in the 1850s. All people of European descent had it very easy."
That isn't at all what I said.
But keep telling us about how slavery wasn't that terrible in the grand scheme of things.
Posted on 8/1/19 at 2:29 pm to GetCocky11
I’m just saying that the dagos and the micks were less valuable than slaves and could be worked to death with little care.
They used them for jobs they wouldn’t use slaves on.
But my point is, slave or free, their descendents are better off for the hardship their ancestors had to endure.
They used them for jobs they wouldn’t use slaves on.
But my point is, slave or free, their descendents are better off for the hardship their ancestors had to endure.
Posted on 8/1/19 at 2:34 pm to fr33manator
quote:
But my point is, slave or free, their descendents are better off for the hardship their ancestors had to endure.
For the slaves, that's only because slavery ended.
And I'm pretty sure they didnt sign up for it with the notion that it was going to.
This post was edited on 8/1/19 at 2:37 pm
Posted on 8/1/19 at 3:18 pm to NATidefan
quote:
For the slaves, that's only because slavery ended. And I'm pretty sure they didnt sign up for it with the notion that it was going to.
Just how dense are you? I never said that anyone signed up for hardship.
You think the Irish signed up to starve to death from famine?
The point I am making is that regardless of how shitty the conditions were in the past, coming to America, in any way, immensely benefitted their offspring down the line and their diaspora
Posted on 8/1/19 at 3:28 pm to fr33manator
quote:
Just how dense are you? I never said that anyone signed up for hardship. You think the Irish signed up to starve to death from famine? The point I am making is that regardless of how shitty the conditions were in the past, coming to America, in any way, immensely benefitted their offspring down the line and their diaspora
Some will never get it. They will continue to think their ancestors had it worse than any other people before or after them. Yep, no disputing it was horrible. You have to wonder what this country would have been like without slavery? How would those that were slaves turned out in Africa? How would our country have turned out? Serious questions.
This post was edited on 8/1/19 at 4:12 pm
Posted on 8/1/19 at 3:28 pm to fr33manator
quote:
I never said that anyone signed up for hardship.
I never said you did.
I was pointing out that the Irish signed up to come to America with hopes of bettering themselves.
The situation was not the same for slaves.
Just because it ended well in your opinion doesnt mean anything.
It's about the the fact that one group had the choice and the other didn't.
Yes, we all know your point is slaves descendants ended up better off than if they had stayed in Africa. Whoopty doo. That's not the fricking point.
This post was edited on 8/1/19 at 3:34 pm
Posted on 8/1/19 at 3:37 pm to lsu480
quote:
They are correct
About what exactly?
Cause if it's about my life being the same as a slaves I would love to hear that one explained.
Posted on 8/1/19 at 3:46 pm to NATidefan
quote:
Yes, we all know your point is slaves descendants ended up better off than if they had stayed in Africa. Whoopty doo.
yeh why would you want to look on the bright side...hard to stay angry if you do
This post was edited on 8/1/19 at 3:46 pm
Posted on 8/1/19 at 3:47 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
yeh why would you want to look on the bright side...hard to stay angry if you do
Seems to always be the case...
Popular
Back to top



0




