- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

2 new carbon capture projects in the works for south Louisiana
Posted on 6/28/23 at 8:26 am
Posted on 6/28/23 at 8:26 am
Hopefully it's just carbon and not all the other crap spewed out by some of those plants.
quote:
![]()
The Nutrien nitrogen phosphate facility in Geismar in the foreground, with several other plants in the background
Denbury Inc., a Texas exploration, pipeline and carbon sequestration company, has announced two new projects in south Louisiana, marking at least its sixth carbon capture endeavor in the state.
The first of the two new projects is a joint venture with Lapis Energy, a Dallas firm that specializes in carbon sequestration. The joint venture, dubbed Libra CO 2 Storage Solutions LLC, calls for Denbury to design and build a carbon sequestration complex at Lapis Energy’s 14,000-acre site in St. Charles Parish, about 20 miles west of New Orleans. Denbury and Lapis Energy will each own a 50% interest in the joint venture, according to a news release.
Denbury and Lapis Energy officials believe the site can hold at least 200 million metric tons of carbon dioxide. Initial carbon injection is slated for 2027.
For reference, 200 million tons of carbon dioxide is equivalent to 44.5 million gasoline-powered vehicles driven for one year or about 22.5 million gallons of gasoline consumed, according to Environmental Protection Agency estimates. The state’s largest greenhouse gas emitter is CF Industries’ ammonia plant in Donaldsonville at roughly 10 million tons per year.
Denbury will connect the Lapis Energy site to its existing carbon dioxide pipeline network via a 45-mile pipeline in southeast Louisiana.
“This high-quality CO2 storage opportunity was first identified by the Lapis subsurface team, and Denbury’s entrance has now confirmed its potential commercial attractiveness to emitters in the region,” Lapis CEO Reg Manhas said in a statement.
Denbury also announced deal with Soterra LLC, a subsidiary of Greif Inc., to develop a carbon sequestration site on roughly 8,500 acres in St. Helena Parish, about 50 miles northeast of Baton Rouge and less than five miles from Denbury’s NEJD CO2 pipeline.
That site, nicknamed Virgo, could hold up to 100 million tons and could be ready for injection by 2026, Denbury officials said.
“Our joint venture with Lapis provides access to an ideal site that is extremely well positioned in a high-emissions area along the Mississippi River between Donaldsonville and New Orleans, and we are excited to work with the Lapis team,” Nik Wood, Denbury’s senior vice president of carbon capture, utilization and storage, said in a statement.
“Our Virgo site is also an ideal CO2 sequestration site, as it is located a very short distance from our existing infrastructure,” Wood added. “Adding both of these sites furthers our strategy to provide the industry’s largest, most reliable, and efficient CO2 transportation and storage network.”
The Advocate
This post was edited on 6/28/23 at 8:27 am
Posted on 6/28/23 at 8:32 am to member12
quote:
For reference, 200 million tons of carbon dioxide is equivalent to 44.5 million gasoline-powered vehicles driven for one year or about 22.5 million gallons of gasoline consumed
That doesn't make sense. Maybe 22.5 Billion gallons?
Either way carbon capture is really really dumb.
Posted on 6/28/23 at 8:34 am to member12
While I think this carbon capture stuff is a farce bubble created for no reason is there any reason that I wouldn’t want Louisiana cashing in on this bubble?
Sounds to me like great blue collar plant jobs. Never a bad thing
Sounds to me like great blue collar plant jobs. Never a bad thing
Posted on 6/28/23 at 8:55 am to Adam Banks
quote:
Sounds to me like great blue collar plant jobs. Never a bad thing
In 20 years when we realize how stupid this whole scheme of dumping emissions into the ground actually was….how will they fix this?
Posted on 6/28/23 at 9:05 am to member12
quote:
n 20 years when we realize how stupid this whole scheme of dumping emissions into the ground actually was….how will they fix this?
With another government incentivized industry to fix it. To which Louisiana will be the beneficiary.
I may not like it but it’s going to happen somewhere. Might as well get the benefits of the jobs in the meantime
Posted on 6/28/23 at 9:08 am to member12
The whole concept of carbon capture is beyond hilarious to me.
What a fricking scam, but good for them for making billions off of idiots
What a fricking scam, but good for them for making billions off of idiots
Posted on 6/28/23 at 9:20 am to member12
why are we taking plant food out of the air? this is suicide.
Posted on 6/28/23 at 9:25 am to member12
quote:
Carbon capture
So, trees?
Posted on 6/28/23 at 9:33 am to Adam Banks
It would be best to think long and hard before a suspect remedy for an unproven problem (man made climate change due to carbon emissions) is allowed to claim eminent domain over private land as a "public carrier" for "public good".
Check out what is happening with one of these C02 carbon capture pipeline projects in South Dakota.
South Dakota landowners sued by C02 pipeline company story
Buying out landowners at the cheapest price enforced by government coercion to create temporary pipeline construction jobs with green new deal funds from our own tax dollars is not a way to build a long term economy, but it may provide just enough cotton candy money to seem attractive.
Check out what is happening with one of these C02 carbon capture pipeline projects in South Dakota.
South Dakota landowners sued by C02 pipeline company story
Buying out landowners at the cheapest price enforced by government coercion to create temporary pipeline construction jobs with green new deal funds from our own tax dollars is not a way to build a long term economy, but it may provide just enough cotton candy money to seem attractive.
Posted on 6/28/23 at 9:36 am to AtlantaLSUfan
Yeah…why not spend the money on planting a forest around these emitters and in cities where there is a lot of vehicle traffic?
That would actually improve the local aesthetic and help provide green space for wildlife. The locals would love it as it’s basically a buffer zone for them.
That would actually improve the local aesthetic and help provide green space for wildlife. The locals would love it as it’s basically a buffer zone for them.
This post was edited on 6/28/23 at 9:39 am
Posted on 6/28/23 at 9:38 am to MRTigerFan
This gets me thinking. The plan by "Green Energy" companies is apparently, toxify Oil & Gas assets with ESG to the point they sell them for pennies on the dollar, then buy them all up on the cheap. Meanwhile, force electric vehicles on us so the only way we can drive is to plug in, no more gas up whenever you feel like it. On the backside, everyone and their damn mama is chasing tax credits for pumping CO2 into the ground, which is an effective way to raise pressure in formations to extract more oil & gas...it's a pretty good strategy. When the oil barons sell out to the "Green Energy" crowd...look out. The oil barons only want your money, what you do with their product is of no concern. "Green Energy" freaks want your complete fealty. They will own you. You will own nothing, and fricking like it.
This post was edited on 6/28/23 at 10:31 am
Posted on 6/28/23 at 10:00 am to Adam Banks
quote:
While I think this carbon capture stuff is a farce bubble created for no reason is there any reason that I wouldn’t want Louisiana cashing in on this bubble?
Sounds to me like great blue collar plant jobs. Never a bad thing
The only negative i see is pushing these green projects and doing less farming. Which is why shite like beef and potatoes will continue to rise in price. I mean in general, not specific to Louisiana.
This post was edited on 6/28/23 at 10:02 am
Posted on 6/28/23 at 10:06 am to Adam Banks
quote:
While I think this carbon capture stuff is a farce bubble created for no reason is there any reason that I wouldn’t want Louisiana cashing in on this bubble?
Sounds to me like great blue collar plant jobs. Never a bad thing
Breaking windows to keep window workers employed is not a good thing.
Econ 099
Posted on 6/28/23 at 10:42 am to TheFlyingTiger
quote:
Breaking windows to keep window workers employed is not a good thing.
That's exactly what this is. It's inventing a problem to keep people employed.
Meanwhile, we have real, legitimate public and private sector infrastructure needs that could keep people busy for years. Real needs, not pretend ones....in the area of transportation, flood protection, cybersecurity (esp. in La), housing, public safety, and education. But we are overlooking them for this industry that's based entirely on a problem that may not be significant enough to worry about right now.
Posted on 6/28/23 at 10:47 am to dgnx6
quote:
The only negative i see is pushing these green projects and doing less farming. Which is why shite like beef and potatoes will continue to rise in price. I mean in general, not specific to Louisiana.
Can you continue to harvest crops or timber on land that's used for sequestration?
My big complaint with this is how we are using valuable farmland for heavily subsidized solar farms. Solar is an excellent solution for supplemental power for residential and commercial buildings, but it's incredibly stupid to put them in giant solar farms. They take up an insane amount of space and provide such little energy in return.
We need more solar on homes and business; not over land that should be used for cattle, crops, or houses.
Posted on 6/28/23 at 11:44 am to TheFlyingTiger
quote:
Breaking windows to keep window workers employed is not a good thing. Econ 099
Carbon capture is going to happen. Whether it’s here, Alabama, South Dakota, Texas, California etc.
If the glass is going to be broken somewhere might as well have Louisiana window workers be the ones to fix it.
In principle I agree no carbon capture but it’s going to happen in practice no matter what
This post was edited on 6/28/23 at 11:45 am
Popular
Back to top
7







