Started By
Message

re: 2 million covid-19 vaccinations now administered. How many severe reactions?

Posted on 12/27/20 at 12:41 pm to
Posted by TulaneLSU
Member since Aug 2003
Member since Dec 2007
13298 posts
Posted on 12/27/20 at 12:41 pm to
Friend,

While less intense than death, the people I have known who had covid-19 would much prefer a typical allergic reaction over what they experienced during their disease from this coronavirus, even those who did not end up in hospital. Now anaphylaxis could be another story, but those cases seem to be very, very rare, perhaps 1 in 100,000? I tried finding news stories about anaphylaxis from the vaccine, and could only find four stories. I am sure there are more. That is why I asked the OT and its many vaccine experts who have been teaching us so much about this vaccine over the last two weeks.

Yours,
TulaneLSU
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
27392 posts
Posted on 12/27/20 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

But much less intense than death


I'll bet on 99:1 odds that don't involve me getting a poorly tested vaccine.

Thanks though.
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
27392 posts
Posted on 12/27/20 at 12:42 pm to
Stick to fricking your mother and dog.

Thanks.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 12/27/20 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

poorly tested vaccine.
What part of the test was poor?

As a large boy, you should be rushing to the front of the line.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
39265 posts
Posted on 12/27/20 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

Funny how low percentages are all of a sudden acceptable when it pertains to a vaccine that has less than a year of history on it, but not for a flu-like virus that have wrecked hundreds of thousands of small businesses and millions of people's finances.

Agreed, but you have to admit the opposite is true - A lot of cowboys on here say the puny risk from the virus is not a concern, but they’re terrified of an even smaller risk from the vaccine.
Posted by pkloa
Member since Jan 2011
2264 posts
Posted on 12/27/20 at 12:51 pm to
Sure, I upvoted, but you know fricking with these baws isn't exactly Christian-like of you.
Posted by MBclass83
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
9358 posts
Posted on 12/27/20 at 12:58 pm to
I think the second shot will cause a few more reactions but that is the purpose of a vaccine. You want your body to react to the invader.
Posted by tigergirl10
Member since Jul 2019
10310 posts
Posted on 12/27/20 at 12:59 pm to
Sorry, not interested in a rushed vaccine for a virus that’s been here less than a year and has a 99.9% survival rate.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68212 posts
Posted on 12/27/20 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

but they’re terrified of an even smaller risk from the vaccine.
No. They are actually worried they will be tracked or turned into some sort of a machine. fricking nuts.
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
27392 posts
Posted on 12/27/20 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

As a large boy, you should be rushing to the front of the line.


This "large boy" had a fever for six hours and spent the next 11 days drinking and woodworking.

#whiteprivelege

This post was edited on 12/27/20 at 1:03 pm
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 12/27/20 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

tigergirl10
Do you believe the virus was manufactured in a lab?
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
66786 posts
Posted on 12/27/20 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

The free thinking anti-vaccer patriots of the OT and PT warned us that there would be widespread anaphylaxis, leading to death. Those who miraculously survived would be walking around droopy faced, sterile, and armless


link to examples? Or are you lying?

Also, your personal experiences and opinions on this topic hold as much legitimacy on this topic as Hillary Clinton on server technology or Bernie with capitalist economy or Faucci on global pandemics. You should take a break from posting your typical bullshite
This post was edited on 12/27/20 at 1:13 pm
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
27392 posts
Posted on 12/27/20 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

What part of the test was poor?


They are just now testing its effects on fertility.

They are just now testing transmission into breast milk. (A friend of mine is actually selling hers for research)

Properly testing a vaccine takes years... Not 9 months.

This entire situation, from day one, has been a psychotic overreaction.
This post was edited on 12/27/20 at 1:07 pm
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 12/27/20 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

They are just now testing its effects on fertility.

They are just now testing effect of transmission into breast milk. (A friend of mine is actually selling hers for research)
What are COVID effects on your fertility or breast milk?
Posted by SECdragonmaster
Order of the Dragons
Member since Dec 2013
16204 posts
Posted on 12/27/20 at 1:06 pm to
Two points:

1. Your personal experience has no value in a scientific analysis. Only a moron or a narcissist believes that their immediate environment is indicative of the greater decision. Sometimes it is consistent and sometimes it is not. Which are you? A narcissist or a moron?

2. When negative outcomes occur, your beloved media will never report on it. They have to control the narrative for the greater good. (They are classic narcissists who think they know better than the rest of us.
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
27392 posts
Posted on 12/27/20 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

What are COVID effects on your fertility or breast milk?


It's unfortunate you laid your hand down so quickly as a troll. I was prepared to go on until the wife wakes up for work.
Posted by EarlyCuyler3
Appalachia
Member since Nov 2017
27290 posts
Posted on 12/27/20 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

Received mine on 12/23/20 and now I don’t want to see my extended family again for 11-12 months.

Weird


You better call the CDC and Dr. Phil.
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
66786 posts
Posted on 12/27/20 at 1:12 pm to
Ahh, Jake is here to coach us on how sane people operate in society. Wonderful
Posted by USMEagles
Member since Jan 2018
11811 posts
Posted on 12/27/20 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

It only gives you pause because you don’t understand it.


I knew most of what you posted below this. It doesn't really contradict what I said. I guess you could argue that RNA isn't "genetic material" in that it's not the DNA you'd pass on to a child, but I think that's pretty dubious, and the action of the Covid vaccine definitely relies on "genetic processes." mRNA is an intermediary (or "messenger") in the genetic process.

This is all novel. Like anything new, from the Edsel to New Math or New Coke, some people will be metaphorical "guinea pigs" and will pioneer the discovery of the pros and cons of this new thing. I don't feel the need to be one of those guinea pigs, and I don't question anyone else who arrives at the same personal conclusion. There will doubtless be tens of millions of us in the USA alone.
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
14731 posts
Posted on 12/27/20 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

99.9% survival rate.


Almost all of the vaccines we get are for things that have very very high survivability rates. I don’t get this argument most things we vaccinate don’t have high death rates.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram