Started By
Message
locked post

What's the point of adding Watson if you gut the team with no chance to reload?

Posted on 3/14/22 at 10:48 am
Posted by ghost2most
Member since Mar 2012
8013 posts
Posted on 3/14/22 at 10:48 am
Some of the names and picks being tossed around...Would cripple this team.

And without the pics, you can't even reload.

Screw that. Just keep as many good players as you can and sign Winston.
Posted by Rand AlThor
Member since Jan 2014
10432 posts
Posted on 3/14/22 at 10:50 am to
We would essentially be banking on the years after we got the picks back
Posted by Laaz2750
Los Angeles
Member since Aug 2008
8500 posts
Posted on 3/14/22 at 10:50 am to
We’re having a good discussion on this in the “here are some names on the block” thread… you should join us
This post was edited on 3/14/22 at 10:51 am
Posted by Hailstate15
ForeverGator's mom's
Member since Nov 2018
21466 posts
Posted on 3/14/22 at 10:50 am to
quote:

if you gut the team with no chance to reload


Since when did two players and 4-5 picks gut the team? This team was half a game back from the playoffs with Taysom Hill. We’re likely NFC title favorites with Watson.
Posted by msstate7
Member since Oct 2014
12619 posts
Posted on 3/14/22 at 10:52 am to
Maybe, but Davenport and Williams are 2 huge losses
Posted by DeathValley85
Member since May 2011
19390 posts
Posted on 3/14/22 at 10:53 am to
quote:

Screw that. Just keep as many good players as you can and sign Winston.


How are there people left who don’t realize you need a top tier QB?

Watson is a 26 year old franchise QB.
Posted by subidc
CharlestonSC
Member since Nov 2019
3311 posts
Posted on 3/14/22 at 10:56 am to
This is a five to 10 year plan.
Posted by msstate7
Member since Oct 2014
12619 posts
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:01 am to
Doubt that's watson's plan. He wants to win
This post was edited on 3/14/22 at 11:02 am
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74482 posts
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:06 am to
quote:

Some of the names and picks being tossed around...Would cripple this team


We will survive giving up late round 1sts

The saints aren’t trading Ram or Lat. Everyone else has an apt replacement already on the roster
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
131968 posts
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:07 am to
The Ruiz and Payton Turner picks could make a lot more sense real quick
Posted by sportsfan
Member since Feb 2011
4328 posts
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:08 am to
The Rams haven't had a first round pick in what seems like a decade. I love building through the draft, but it's not the only way.
Posted by Delusional
Member since Dec 2018
6735 posts
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:08 am to
No chance to reload? Have you not been paying attention to the Saints drafts since 2016? They've been money in rounds 2-4
Posted by BlacknGold
He Hate Me
Member since Mar 2009
12528 posts
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:12 am to
Didnt the Rams just prove you dont need firsts to win the super bowl?
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63722 posts
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:12 am to
quote:

What's the point of adding Watson if you gut the team with no chance to reload?



agree
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
22284 posts
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:14 am to
quote:

Some of the names and picks being tossed around...Would cripple this team.

Bit of an overreaction. Ram can't be moved because his cap hit would be as big as Watson's. The other players mentioned

Ruiz/McCoy: You can find a new center outside of the 1st round
Davenport/Onyemata: Can argue Davenport's replacement may already been on the team, it would just weaken the depth chart. IMO, Onyemata would hurt more than Davenport
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74482 posts
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:17 am to
quote:

The Ruiz and Payton Turner picks could make a lot more sense real quick


I think Davenport would be the headliner player to go with the picks. Someone from the interior OL whether it be McCoy Ruiz or Peat

I do think Houston’s main focus are the picks
Posted by MSG
B.R.
Member since Dec 2007
11279 posts
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:18 am to
What don’t you people understand? If you don’t have a franchise Qb, you have nothing if your goal is to make a run at a super bowl
Posted by Doug_H
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Sep 2013
2775 posts
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:21 am to
quote:

Can argue Davenport's replacement may already been on the team

Fair point, and even an argument made to whether or not he's worth a large contract investment due to his injury history and missing games each year.

quote:

IMO, Onyemata would hurt more than Davenport

Cannot agree with you here. This defense is way different with Davenport in the lineup each of the last 2 years. When Onyemata has missed games to injury or suspension, while his presence was missed somewhat, it's not near the same impact as when Davenport is gone. Also look how we are able to backfill Onyemata with undrafted free agents and not have much of a drop off, we cannot say the same for our DEs.
Posted by ghost2most
Member since Mar 2012
8013 posts
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:29 am to
You're also losing M. Williams though.

Take Williams and Davenport off the D and we go from top 5 to middle of the pack maybe worse.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63722 posts
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:33 am to
quote:

What don’t you people understand? If you don’t have a franchise Qb, you have nothing if your goal is to make a run at a super bowl



...therefore, overpay for a guy whose future in the NFL was so tenuous a week ago that nobody was willing to go after him, and his own team wouldn't play him?

You can't be simple minded. You need a QB AND a supporting cast AND salary cap management to give you chances to make a run. You can't throw all of our eggs in only 1 of those baskets. It doesn't work.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram