Underhill and NOF are bit shady (Penning Situation)

This whole thing is rubbing me the wrong way.

Here is the series of events:

- Underhill and Co. talks up Penning for two years through his injury

- Supports penning when he played like crap in preseason and week 1

- Says he just needs more reps and he'll improve in the passing game (no mention of the run game)

- He gets more reps and does indeed improve on pass protection

- Then, yesterday, almost seemingly out of the blue, Underhill releases this random hit piece, saying Penning has been terrible in run protection and should be benched. Hmm, that's kind of weird. Hadn't he been improving in pass protection with more reps? What's to say he can't do it for run game too? Whatever, didn't think much of it.

- Welp, what do you know? Today, NOF announced that Penning is likely to be benched, per source, for Hurst in a video report tweet that is now DELETED: LINK. Why did they delete the tweet? Edit: Looks like they reposted the tweet with completely different stats and language: LINK

Sorry, but this just rubs me the wrong way. Congrats Underhill on getting tipped off that this was coming. Glad you have a source. Now, he needs to be asking tough questions based on prior statements our decision makers made weeks ago, but I doubt he will. Nothing like talking up a young player, then writing some hit piece on him just to get ahead of the news. What a freak.