Started By
Message
locked post

Should the Saints retire #57?

Posted on 6/1/23 at 11:35 am
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
17197 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 11:35 am
I'm an old geezer and I hate seeing players wear #57 especially but also #51 #7 and even #77.


INB4 ya can't retire all the numbers dumbass.


ETA: after a little digging it seems the Saints only have two retired numbers from the Mecom debacle I mean ownership.

#81 - Doug Atkins
#31 - Jim Taylor

Officially the New Orleans Saints no longer retire jersey numbers. (though some are not made available i.e. #8 and I would assume #9)

This post was edited on 6/1/23 at 12:30 pm
Posted by SportsGuyNOLA
New Orleans, LA
Member since May 2014
20733 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 11:39 am to
I’d be ok either way
Posted by DomincDecoco
RIP Ronnie fights Thoth’s loafers
Member since Oct 2018
12017 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 11:55 am to
7,8,57,77

9 in a few years.

HOF required, Manning is exception

Eta- now ring of honor is different, should be names but not numbers such as:

All HOF
Cam Jordan
Steve Gleason
Deuce MCallister

Theres the real debate, who qualifies
This post was edited on 6/1/23 at 12:00 pm
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
22271 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 12:06 pm to
The issue I have with #7 is he played as many years with other teams as he did with the Saints. Hell, his stats were actually slightly better when he played elsewhere

I like the idea for the other 3, but you would also need to include #9 in that group, as most of their career was with the Saints and they are in the HoF.

Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
17197 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 12:24 pm to
iirc the only official retires numbers for the Saints are #31 Jim Taylor and #81 Doug Atkins. While #8 & #9 aren't actually retired it's pretty much off limits from what I understand.

Tend to agree with you on #7, plus he played for the Falcons. . but even so the ole Great Dane always loved New Orleans and never as far as I remember talked crap about the city or Saints even after getting lowballed on his contract offer which lead to him leaving.
Posted by touchdownjeebus
Member since Sep 2010
26829 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 1:05 pm to
Yes. Rickey Jackson is the best player in our team’s history.
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
25120 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 1:38 pm to
9 in a few years? What? It isn’t available now
Posted by BigBinBR
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2023
10220 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

Rickey Jackson is the best player in our team’s history.


Rickey Jackson is my favorite Saints player. I don’t think they should retire his number, but they damn sure shouldn’t let anyone else wear it.
Posted by metryboy
Member since Oct 2008
738 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 1:55 pm to
Ummm that’s the literal definition of retiring the jersey.
Posted by Suntiger
STG or BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
36333 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 2:10 pm to
I think you have to be more picky when retiring numbers. I’d say we retire #9 and that’s it at the moment.

57, 7, 77, 26 & 94 can go into the Saints HOF and ring of honor. But not retired.


But hey, that’s just like my opinion.
Posted by Doug_H
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Sep 2013
2774 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 2:35 pm to
No, no numbers should be retired.
Posted by hsfolk
Member since Sep 2009
19358 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 3:21 pm to
only so many that can be realistically retired
Posted by bstaceyau19
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2022
1599 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 3:40 pm to
The Saints do not officially retire numbers. 31 and 81 have been unretired and issued. The Saints officially honor former players using the ring of honor.

The equipment staff, on their own authority, refuse to issue #'s 8 and 9, but those numbers are not retired and could be issued if future staffers in the equipment department choose not to continue this tradition.

The NFL has asked teams not to retire numbers but they can if they want.
This post was edited on 6/1/23 at 3:41 pm
Posted by BigBinBR
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2023
10220 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

Ummm that’s the literal definition of retiring the jersey.


No it’s not. Retiring numbers is stupid. If you retire a number, that’s it, it’s done. But just because it’s not retired doesn’t mean they have to dole out 57 to every scrub that wants to wear it.
Posted by Manswers
Michigan
Member since Feb 2009
3789 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 4:05 pm to
I understand why the Packers would retire 31 for Jim Taylor but why would the Saints? How long did he actually play for the Saints and what did he do?
Posted by geauxpurple
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2014
17793 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 7:15 pm to
The only one that I don’t want to see anyone else wear is #9.

Atkins 81 and Taylor 31 were two of the NFLs all time greats but they were washed up by the time they got here.
Posted by DomincDecoco
RIP Ronnie fights Thoth’s loafers
Member since Oct 2018
12017 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

9 in a few years? What? It isn’t available now


This post was edited on 6/1/23 at 9:38 pm
Posted by SirWinston
Say NO to War
Member since Jul 2014
104464 posts
Posted on 6/2/23 at 12:18 am to
Jim Taylor's number being retired is insane
Posted by bstaceyau19
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2022
1599 posts
Posted on 6/2/23 at 12:53 am to
quote:

Jim Taylor's number being retired is insane


It was a big deal back in 1967 that both Jim Taylor and Paul Hornung were to join the Saints. Of course Hornung was too injured to ever play and Taylor only lasted 1 season.
Posted by Hamma1122
Member since Sep 2016
22573 posts
Posted on 6/2/23 at 6:50 am to
Yes 57 should be retired
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram