- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Remaining realistic FAs at positions of need on Day 3
Posted on 3/11/26 at 9:19 am to St Augustine
Posted on 3/11/26 at 9:19 am to St Augustine
quote:
I think we should have at least one known quantity to help with Shoughs development
Olave Vele Juwan Fant… that’s 4 known options
Posted on 3/11/26 at 9:20 am to St Augustine
I am just perplexed that people could look at least year's WRs, talk all offseason about how huge a need it is, then say "Nah we are good, maybe a rookie"
We should DEFINITELY address WR early in the draft no matter what, but Rookie WRs are notorious for taking longer than some other positions to contribute.
We should address it with at least one Vet and one rookie.
Competition is good.
We should DEFINITELY address WR early in the draft no matter what, but Rookie WRs are notorious for taking longer than some other positions to contribute.
We should address it with at least one Vet and one rookie.
Competition is good.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 9:20 am to Lsujacket66
Having both kamara and Etienne will also help in the passing game
Kamara could line up in the slot tbh
Kamara could line up in the slot tbh
Posted on 3/11/26 at 9:22 am to Fun Bunch
I like Brad Chubb & Mike Hilton coming off down years. Chubb would be two years removed from ACL, still only 29. Hilton can fill the slot role
I want one of the vet safeties and a boundary corner
I need a vet WR - Kirk, Hopkins, Mooney, Hollywood brown
And I’m still trying to add a vet OL or two with experience
I want one of the vet safeties and a boundary corner
I need a vet WR - Kirk, Hopkins, Mooney, Hollywood brown
And I’m still trying to add a vet OL or two with experience
Posted on 3/11/26 at 9:22 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Rookie WRs are notorious for taking longer than some other positions to contribute.
Idk man, I don’t know if that’s true. Shaheed was undrafted and contributed, the guy in Carolina won roty.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 9:22 am to GynoSandberg
I didn't mention Chubb because I thought he might get more than we are willing to pay, but yeah he would be a good fit
Posted on 3/11/26 at 9:23 am to Chad504boy
I meant additional sorry.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 9:23 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
am just perplexed that people could look at least year's WRs, talk all offseason about how huge a need it is, then say "Nah we are good, maybe a rookie"
Same
Posted on 3/11/26 at 9:23 am to NIH
I wouldn’t mind Mooney if it’s a low cost. Played at Tulane so he might give us the hometown discount. Draft a receiver in the 2nd. A good one should make it down.
And Hobbs that GB just cut to play the nickel. Guys that we can get cheap on one year deals to fill in.
And Hobbs that GB just cut to play the nickel. Guys that we can get cheap on one year deals to fill in.
This post was edited on 3/11/26 at 9:26 am
Posted on 3/11/26 at 9:25 am to Proximo
quote:
Idk man, I don’t know if that’s true.
Its true. There are many guys that do contribute day 1. But its a position that in years past has been notorious for a lot of guys taking more than one year for the light to go on.
I just cannot see going into the year with:
Olave - 1 snap away from being in a coma
Vele - did nothing until Shough started then was injured the rest of the year
No one of real note after that. Lots of question marks and guys with unrealized talent.
This was not even a remotely controversial opinion until like two days ago. I feel like I am taking crazy pills here
Posted on 3/11/26 at 9:25 am to Fun Bunch
I think PFF has him at like 2/15? Kind of a chase young deal to try and establish value. Should be ample opportunity and Staley has a track record of producing double digit sack guys
A bosa reunion could work in the same vein
A bosa reunion could work in the same vein
Posted on 3/11/26 at 9:26 am to GynoSandberg
quote:
I think PFF has him at like 2/15?
Would be 100% all over that
Posted on 3/11/26 at 9:27 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
This was not even a remotely controversial opinion until like two days ago. I feel like I am taking crazy pills here
First and second round receivers contribute early all the time though. I’ve heard DT’s take time to develop.
I’d have to look through the ones taken the last few years but I know of a few off the top of my head like Egbuka, Carolina guy, shaheed; etc
Not saying we shouldn’t address it
Posted on 3/11/26 at 9:27 am to NIH
quote:
Why is Darnell Mooney getting little run as a FA?
He would be a great signing. Sitting in the Dome and watching him torch us for the game sealing touchdown as all of the trashy arse Magic City falcons fans erupted in joy made me wanna vomit last year. We had that game won.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 9:28 am to Proximo
quote:
Having both kamara and Etienne will also help in the passing game
We will draft a WR and added Fant, Etienne, and Polk. That's 4 offensive weapons we didn't have last year.
Improved OL will also give Shough and WR more time to make plays.
I don't see a need to spend any more money on offense unless we are replacing Ruiz.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 9:29 am to Dantheman504
Yeah my concern with a WR is the absurd amount of money 6-709 yard players are getting.
I’d rather draft one in the second
I’d rather draft one in the second
Posted on 3/11/26 at 9:30 am to Proximo
quote:
I’d have to look through the ones taken the last few years
A few of them are available in FA right now already having been cut
Posted on 3/11/26 at 9:31 am to Dantheman504
Fant is a TE. Etienne is a RB.
We are talking about WRs, I don't lump all "Pass Catchers" together, that is nonsense.
And if you are relying on Polk at all you are nuts. That is a lottery ticket.
You don't prepare for the offseason counting on someone like Polk. If he hits, great.
We are talking about WRs, I don't lump all "Pass Catchers" together, that is nonsense.
And if you are relying on Polk at all you are nuts. That is a lottery ticket.
You don't prepare for the offseason counting on someone like Polk. If he hits, great.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 9:32 am to Fun Bunch
Only WR I've heard this year that's ready now to start for any team and any capacity is Tate. They say he knows the entire route tree and is day one ready. They use to say wait till year three for a reason.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 9:33 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
And if you are relying on Polk at all you are nuts. That is a lottery ticket. You don't prepare for the offseason counting on someone like Polk. If he hits, great.
The saints are much more informed at what they think they have with Polk at this time than either of us. Same w Palmer and Bub.
Popular
Back to top


1




