Started By
Message

re: Payton rails against guns after Smith's death

Posted on 4/11/16 at 4:25 pm to
Posted by Keeble9145
Member since Sep 2015
973 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 4:25 pm to
:rotflmao:

along with our rights as human beings. This country would turn into the hunger games
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
124277 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

Kinda like how the drug supply has dried up?



Apples and oranges.
Posted by ghost2most
Member since Mar 2012
7518 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 4:26 pm to
Good chance he's alive today if he didn't have a gun. No gun, he wouldn't have said he had one and would have walked away.

Either way, having a gun sure as shite didn't help did it?
Posted by Clockwatcher68
Youngsville
Member since May 2006
7291 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

Couldn't have said it better myself. He's 100 percent right.

Coach nailed it. Gun nuts just don't get it.


He's just another blue state bitch. He blames the tool and the NRA instead of the killer. This is not Australia or the UK. There are 300 million guns in this country, and y'all are never going to take them. Get your own, or keep whining. I don't really care.
This post was edited on 4/12/16 at 3:07 pm
Posted by Laaz2750
Los Angeles
Member since Aug 2008
8477 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 4:26 pm to
it would take a lot more than 30 years. There are 350 million guns in America and they last damned near forever. I have a hundred year old shotgun my Grandfather gave me and it still shoots like the day it was made.
Posted by ghost2most
Member since Mar 2012
7518 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 4:28 pm to
How about this compromise? Release all non-violent drug offenders and start throwing the book at anyone with an illegal gun instead.

You can keep your gun, following a legit process and licensing exam that proves you know how to use it and are mentally stable with regular updates like with a driver's license.

Caught with an illegal one though? Your arse is in the slammer.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
124277 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

it would take a lot more than 30 years. There are 350 million guns in America and they last damned near forever. I have a hundred year old shotgun my Grandfather gave me and it still shoots like the day it was made.




Thugs aren't going around killing people with 100 year old guns.

As the gun supply drops, more and more are confiscated, less of them are hitting the streets, there would be a direct correlation with less and less gun violence, in theory.

Just playing devil's advocate here.

I am not in favor of the government taking away responsible gun owner's guns as long as the 2nd amendment is in place. We have a Constitution.
Posted by THRILLHO
Metry, LA
Member since Apr 2006
49979 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 4:29 pm to
Stricter gun control will simply make it more difficult for typical citizens to defend themselves against people that have no concern for laws. Someone that is willing to murder another person isn't going to be phased by gun laws.

Just look at the war on drugs. We continue to spend more and more money "keeping drugs off the streets" and yet addiction levels have remained mostly steady since the war began.
Posted by quail man
New York, NY
Member since May 2010
41117 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

You don't think the criminals would do the right thing and turn in their guns like the law abiding one's did?



i hate this argument. completely short sighted.

"we won't benefit from this railroad for another 25 years so why even bother, i may be dead!"

frick future generations, am i right?
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59853 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

man was murdered and his wife was shot, but you think he was better off by not having a gun to protect himself?


In this situation witnesses report that Smith told the shooter that he had a gun and the shooter said So do I. If that is what happened then If Smith doesn't have a gun/threaten the shooter with the gun who knows what happens very likely he is alive.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
124277 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

Just look at the war on drugs. We continue to spend more and more money "keeping drugs off the streets" and yet addiction levels have remained mostly steady since the war began.




And that has been true for countries with both a war on drugs and strict gun control. Their drug addiction rates stay the same, and yet they have extremely low gun related deaths.

It lends itself to the idea that people will get drugs no matter what...but they will not get guns.

To do anything about it, it would take an extremely radical effort and many, many decades.

It will never happen in this country. And as I said, it would require a changed Constitution.
Posted by MoreOrLes
Member since Nov 2008
19472 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

and are mentally stable with regular updates like with a driver's license.


Who judge mental stability as it changes really rapidly. What you propose is just a slippery slope.

And why are law abiding citizens expected to do more to keep their rights than say those folks who aren't expected to have a license to vote?
Posted by Dead End
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2013
21237 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

Apples and oranges.


You should stick to being a football fan.
Posted by LSUlefty
Youngsville, LA
Member since Dec 2007
27440 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

How about this compromise? Release all non-violent drug offenders and start throwing the book at anyone with an illegal gun instead.


I can kind of get behind that.
Posted by apfour21
New Orleans, LA
Member since Nov 2012
3143 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 4:37 pm to
He's 100% Correct
Posted by LSUlefty
Youngsville, LA
Member since Dec 2007
27440 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 4:39 pm to
just curious, does anyone know if Hayes legally owned the gun used?
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
124277 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

You should stick to being a football fan.


Again, as I have pointed out, many Western Nations have both a war on drugs, and strict gun control. Drugs proliferate just as much there as here, but they have extremely low gun violence.

As many of those nations have shifted to treatment of drugs instead of prosecution, they have done better.

This is a more nuanced discussion that you want to believe.

Again, I'm playing a bit of devil's advocate here. I have owned guns in the past. I'd like to buy a handgun soon.
Posted by kengel2
Team Gun
Member since Mar 2004
32937 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 4:40 pm to
Ill listen to Sean Payton about football and how not to have an affair.

Other than that his opinion doesn't mean shite to me.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
32209 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

Couldn't have said it better myself. He's 100 percent right.

Coach nailed it. Gun nuts just don't get it


I'm not one, but I know several "gun nuts". They aren't the ones out killing people. In fact, they probably have the most respect for the power of guns.

It's nothing more than a culture problem. A culture that does not respect human life and sees no issue whatsoever with using a gun to kill a rival/combatant/someone who has wronged them. In fact, using a gun to kill someone else is glamorized. When you have a culture where many, quite literally, aspire to be "thugs" or "gangsters", there is no hope.

2nd amendment issues aside, the whole "banning guns" argument is akin to banning drugs. Most of the people doing many of the killings in inner cities aren't doing with guns they picked up at Jimbo's Firearms store. They are doing it with stolen guns they are buying off the streets. Chicago has some of the strictest guns laws in the country. Yet they also have one of the highest gun related homicide rates in the country. Drugs are illegal. There are no stores (at least in LA) that sell them. Yet, people who want to use drugs somehow are able to get them. Likewise, people who want to use guns for illegal purposes have no problem with using illegal means to obtain them. "Banning" guns in America will just create and increase an illegal black market for obtaining them. They will come in from other countries (just like drugs) and the criminals will continue to purchase them.

Simple people just look for the simplest solution. No more guns = no more shootings. Right? Sure, that's if the people doing the shootings are willing (voluntarily or by force) to give up their guns. Only the naive think they will by either means.

If someone is willing to bust into your house and hold you at gunpoint, or simply just willing to shoot you on the street, do you not think they are also willing to break the law to obtain the gun to do it?
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13116 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 4:42 pm to
Unfortunately, the law is not what matters. It is not the law abiding citizen that is going around killing people. The thugs will find a way to get a gun regardless of the laws. Heroin, cocaine, etc. are illegal too. Do the laws prevent the criminals from getting them as well?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram