Started By
Message

re: I'm amazed at the seeming apathy towards Marshon Lattimore

Posted on 5/1/17 at 5:24 pm to
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
31621 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 5:24 pm to
Marcus Peters was a Pro Bowler year 1.


All Pro in year 2.


Same with Patrick Peterson
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166415 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 5:25 pm to
More than one way to skin a cat
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
31621 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 5:27 pm to
I'll be sure to call Payton, Loomis, Ireland and the dozens upon dozens of scouts who dedicate their life to this shite that they made a terrible pick.

Posted by P bean
br
Member since Dec 2006
4073 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 5:31 pm to
Pat peterson had sever cramping issues that took him out of several games. Does it mean that you shouldn't draft him or not be excited about him as a draft pic?

Lattimore is literally almost pat peterson talented. Sure, his hamstring injuries are worse than Pat Pete's cramping, but I agree that this board is completely delusional by not being excited about getting Lattimore.

Claiborne was a no 6 pick, as a lesser prospect than Lattimore. He ran a 4.5 and was not as fluid or explosive. He had a clean bill of health all through college, and now look at him in the pros constantly injured.

Some things cannot be controlled. Lattimore if stays healthy, is literally one of the most talented cornerback's to come out of the draft in a while. To get a top corner at number 11 is unheard of. Saints were very lucky.
This post was edited on 5/1/17 at 5:33 pm
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
31621 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 5:35 pm to
Bottom line is this, there are miserable fricks on this site that would have poked holes and found problems with ANY player we had drafted, even if it was Myles Garrett.
Posted by breauxmosexual
New Orleans, LA
Member since Aug 2016
2526 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 5:37 pm to
The only pick with zero holes in it was the Kamara pick.
Posted by P bean
br
Member since Dec 2006
4073 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 5:39 pm to
Dude Allen is not a defensive end in our scheme, he's a DT in 4-3. If you don't know squat about football please don't post your opinion
Posted by fierysnowman
Louisiana
Member since Jan 2015
1968 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 5:39 pm to
This is a reaction to the horrible draftees(except last year) of the past 5 or 6 drafts. People are scarred from those drafts and on edge, with very little faith in the saints front office.

I for one am ecstatic about this pick. He has all star potential.

I think people also haven't caught on to the fact that the saints have cleaned house in their scouting department and actually have a competent war room now
Posted by Seeker
Member since Jul 2011
1846 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 5:41 pm to
The truth is every drafted player has holes, even the top pick Garrett. People are only choosing to hear the potential negatives about a player. They listen to guys like Mayock, who will spend 8 minutes talking about how great a prospect is and 2 minutes talking about concerns and they walk away only talking about concerns.

Also using the "we have a history of..." as an excuse to not like a player drafted now because of what has happened before is pessimistic vagina talk. It really makes many people in this fan base look like over dramatic Kardashians.
Posted by fierysnowman
Louisiana
Member since Jan 2015
1968 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 5:43 pm to
They were also so convinced we were taking a 1st pick edge rusher that they completely turned their nose up to the fact we landed the best cover man in the draft.


P.s
Has anyone checked out our new free safety's(the Utah kid) film. I can't help but feel he will be special he is Always around the ball
This post was edited on 5/1/17 at 5:44 pm
Posted by bnh
Earth
Member since Feb 2011
1489 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

hamstring issues (that doesn't go away)


Explain how he played every game last year
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
31621 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 5:45 pm to
No need to check the film, the Saints drafted him so he's probably garbage amirite?
Posted by smash williams
San Diego
Member since Apr 2009
19749 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 5:49 pm to
I think it's more about the recent plaque of injuries suffered on the Saints defense. Multiple players from this recent draft have an extensive injury history.
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
158773 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

pick because of his hamstring issues (that doesn't go away


Well they did last season so...
Posted by CocoLoco
Member since Jan 2012
29108 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 5:59 pm to
I'm worried about them having such a lack of pass rush that it doesn't matter if the secondary actually has talent

Maybe Hendrickson ends up being a gem, or Okafor performs well, or Kikaha... any of those guys. I'm just not confident with it. Lattimore was a smart pick considering value, but I still think they should've addressed edge earlier in the draft.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72049 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 6:14 pm to
Its bc 100 mock draft had us getting Barnett and all the Ronnie's here thought he was the only option for us.
Posted by saintsfan1977
West Monroe, from Cajun country
Member since Jun 2010
7761 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 6:15 pm to
quote:

I'm worried about them having such a lack of pass rush that it doesn't matter if the secondary actually has talent



Im not. We were 4th overall in QB hits last year with 106. We were 27th in sacks with 30. That tells me the split seconds we weren't able to sack QBs was due to the coverage. Lattimore and Williams along with a healthy secondary probably fixes those issues.
This post was edited on 5/1/17 at 6:16 pm
Posted by DeathValley85
Member since May 2011
17184 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 6:18 pm to
quote:

Marcus Peters was a Pro Bowler year 1. All Pro in year 2. Same with Patrick Peterson


I'll take some of that
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
31621 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 6:19 pm to
I agree to a certain extent. But for some reason I think Okafor will be enough.

The only reason he didn't start was because he was behind two double digit sack guys in Chandler Jones and Markus Golden. When he played last season he got 4 sacks and was top 5 in edge pressures efficiency. He also played all year with a torn biceps muscle, also part of the reason he lost his starting gig.

He isn't going to come in and be Cam Jordan, but if he can find his 2014 self then we will be set. He's also 26 and on a one year prove it deal. I also believe he and Vaccaro were teammates at Texas and he convinced him to sign here instead of with Zona. Because they were interested in bringing him back.
This post was edited on 5/1/17 at 6:20 pm
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25418 posts
Posted on 5/1/17 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

Also using the "we have a history of..." as an excuse to not like a player drafted now because of what has happened before is pessimistic vagina talk. It really makes many people in this fan base look like over dramatic Kardashians.


It's irrational, superstitious logic. It's something that is part of the culture of being a sports fan, but it doesn't make it any less fantasy. Just because historically like 20 years ago or even 2 years ago the Saints busted out on a cb prospect does not mean that the Saints are any more disposed to bust out on a cb prospect in the first round this year.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram