Started By
Message

re: Fleener To Saints, 5 year deal, $36 million

Posted on 3/9/16 at 6:55 pm to
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
179662 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 6:55 pm to
Keeping a vertical TE threat is healthy for us. I'm okay w it. It's very low risk w a HOF QB
Posted by nolaandy
Metry
Member since Dec 2013
452 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 6:57 pm to
I'm surprised it took so many pages for people to point out the obvious that is guaranteed money.
Posted by Broken Ear Glen
Baton Roog
Member since Mar 2010
1321 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 6:58 pm to
Here's all you need to know dude. We just signed Coby Fleener, an average TE at best, for 70 percent of the money jimmy graham makes for roughly 25 percent of JGs production.
Posted by Mouth
Member since Jan 2008
23088 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 6:59 pm to
quote:

Keeping a vertical TE threat is healthy for us.


I agree. That's why I like Fleener.

but we coulda signed your boy Mario with this money. Defense is more important at the moment.

Go cheap on a veteran TE and go big on a veteran pass rusher would of been better imo.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74464 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 6:59 pm to
RE: Fleener's past production

Ben Watson's best season in New England with the GOAT QB Tom Brady was 49/643/3!!!!1111 TOm frickin Brady! Didnt stop Ben from going HAM last season


RE: Fleener's contract

Dwyane Allen, Jordan Cameron, Kyle Rudolph, Dennis Pitta, Zach Ertz, Charles Clay, Vernon Davis, Charles Clay, Jared Cook

These guys are or were all making $7+ mil per year. These dudes havent done dick outside of a Vernon Davis; matter of fact, Fleener has damn near match all of their best seasons while sharing TE duties with Dwayne Allen


6'6" 250 @ 4.5 doesn't grow on trees, gents. On a team with almost zero pass catching weapons, this should be seen as a welcome addition by the fans
This post was edited on 3/9/16 at 7:01 pm
Posted by Cheesy Beaver
Kenna brah
Member since Dec 2014
4424 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 7:00 pm to
Tigerbait you think we can treat fleeners contract as depreciating asset? I kid, but if it's a back loaded contract I'm in for it. If its 7 mil a year yikes
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
62868 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

Plus everyone knows the only number that matters is the guaranteed money


I can't believe it took till page 6 to get to this point. Everyone is retardedly focusing on just the average/year. Most of that 36 could be backloaded when either the cap increases or we may be able to outright cut him. 10 of this could be all that's guaranteed. I'll wait to have my pussy bleed all over here until we find out the full details.
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
163052 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 7:02 pm to
Not a fleener fan, but TEs seem to flourish here so whatever, I'll wait to see the details
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
62868 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

We just signed Coby Fleener, an average TE at best, for 70 percent of the money jimmy graham makes for roughly 25 percent of JGs production


He only had 25% of JG's production this year? If so, I agree, that's fricking terrible. But I bet it's not.
Posted by LSUFM57
Member since Jul 2012
308 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 7:03 pm to
All depends how much is guaranteed
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 7:04 pm to
Bravo Gyno.
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

Here's all you need to know dude. We just signed Coby Fleener, an average TE at best, for 70 percent of the money jimmy graham makes for roughly 25 percent of JGs production.




So you don't know the details which is pretty important in terms on NFL contracts. This isn't the NBA

Derp. You don't understand the salary cap
Posted by Brettesaurus Rex
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
38261 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 7:06 pm to
I think this a good pick up. A little rich for my taste but I have to wonder if he's basically going to be the new Colston of the offense with him gone.
Posted by Broken Ear Glen
Baton Roog
Member since Mar 2010
1321 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 7:07 pm to
quote:


He only had 25% of JG's production this year? If so, I agree, that's fricking terrible. But I bet it's not.


It's not like he wasn't in a TE friendly offense last 3 years though. The Ben Watson comparison I do not like. Fleener before nola cannot be compared to Watson before nola. 2 totally different roles prior.
Posted by Mouth
Member since Jan 2008
23088 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 7:08 pm to
I think we can all atleast agree that Fleener should be very productive in our offense.
Posted by LooseCannon22282
South Alabama Fan
Member since May 2008
36034 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 7:15 pm to
yeah true that.

I just hope we pick some D-linemen in FA though. The defense needs help worse than the offense.

Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
179662 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 7:16 pm to
Does anyone else want to go treadwell now then go Guard Guard RB then maybe an OLB and a Punter?
Posted by HollierThanThou
Member since Jan 2012
6276 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 7:17 pm to
Damn, feels like too much for Fleener. But Brees does need targets...
Posted by LooseCannon22282
South Alabama Fan
Member since May 2008
36034 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 7:19 pm to
yeah for real
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
291484 posts
Posted on 3/9/16 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

Plus everyone knows the only number that matters is the guaranteed money


I can't believe it took till page 6 to get to this point



pretty sure everyone realize its about guaranteed money. Goes without saying.

a $36mil deal is going to command 8 figures in guaranteed money
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram