- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Does anyone in here think Richardson will be an impact guy?
Posted on 2/28/23 at 10:38 am
Posted on 2/28/23 at 10:38 am
(no message)
Posted on 2/28/23 at 10:49 am to Jaydeaux
Take Hendon Hooker over Richardson..
Look at Georgia QB later in draft before Drafting Richardson. Drafting Richardson would be Malik Willis 2.0
Look at Georgia QB later in draft before Drafting Richardson. Drafting Richardson would be Malik Willis 2.0
Posted on 2/28/23 at 10:50 am to Jaydeaux
I know he will test off the charts at the combine, but this is a guy with a 53.8% completion percentage and 17 TDS to 9 interceptions last year. There isn’t a ton of tape on him either. While he may very well turn out to be a decent NFL quarterback, I would be scared to death to draft that guy number one overall (or even top 10).
Posted on 2/28/23 at 11:10 am to lacajun069
LOL and I get 4 downvotes. So four of you want Richardson. I don’t pretend to know but seems like a massive risk
Posted on 2/28/23 at 11:15 am to Jaydeaux
If he's there when we pick in the 1st, I'd take him. I wouldn't move up for him
Posted on 2/28/23 at 11:18 am to Jaydeaux
All I know is Florida offense looked so much better when Richardson was in there compared to previous season when he was rotating with Emory Jones. Damn near impossible to know how he will translate to the NFL.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 11:20 am to Jaydeaux
He could be, but it's highly unlikely.
He is the "Josh Allen is going to get multiple GMs fired" prototype. Mediocre in college with traits that historically are not able to be improved, but with outstanding physical traits.
He is the "Josh Allen is going to get multiple GMs fired" prototype. Mediocre in college with traits that historically are not able to be improved, but with outstanding physical traits.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 11:36 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:He's a huge roll of the dice. Like people say, below the neck he's going to be almost ideal. Big arm, big and excellent athlete.
. Mediocre in college with traits that historically are not able to be improved, but with outstanding physical traits.
I keep reading about whether these guys can translate to an NFL offense (Hooker included)... what's the cons of trying to run something similar to what they did in college? Is the concern just that they'd get hit too much, you shorten his career?
It seemed like Jalen Hurts ran something like that, led the Eagles in rushing. Took them to the Superbowl and within a few plays of winning it. He's not a prototype pocket guy, don't think he would have done what he did if you tried to stay with a mainstream offense.
With the rules the way they are, kinda seems like you can play to use the mobile QB, and teach him to slide when it looks like he will get crushed. And after a couple years starting experience, you can start reeling in the runs some, as he gets better with the passing game overall.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 11:51 am to Jaydeaux
I was convinced Josh Allen would be an all time bust
I've decided I don't know shite about QBs and I will support anyone the team drafts. That being said, I prefer the QBs in the draft, in this order
Stroud
Hooker
Young
Levis
Richardson
The field
But I won't be upset if we draft any of the top 5, because we desperately need to groom a cheap starter that can grow into a franchise QB. Those 5 are the only ones that I think have a chance at making it to a second contract/starter money.
I've decided I don't know shite about QBs and I will support anyone the team drafts. That being said, I prefer the QBs in the draft, in this order
Stroud
Hooker
Young
Levis
Richardson
The field
But I won't be upset if we draft any of the top 5, because we desperately need to groom a cheap starter that can grow into a franchise QB. Those 5 are the only ones that I think have a chance at making it to a second contract/starter money.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 11:56 am to Scoob
quote:
what's the cons of trying to run something similar to what they did in college? Is the concern just that they'd get hit too much, you shorten his career?
See: Lamar Jackson, who was 10x the prospect that Richardson is. Hell you can probably add Cam Newton to that list, too.
Cam was washed out physically around 30 and couldn't play QB without it. Lamar looks to be heading down the same path.
Both of these guys were SO much better as prospects than Richardson. Much better college careers and passing efficiency.
quote:
It seemed like Jalen Hurts ran something like that, led the Eagles in rushing.
This would be comparable if you looked at Jalen Hurts as a freshman or sophomore. Compare his final year at OU to Richardson's last year at UF.
Hurts works harder than almost any other guy and has improved himself due to sheer will. Richardson has no indications he's in the same stratosphere as Hurts. Hurts had accuracy issues that he's improved upon greatly, but he was always smart and avoided big hits from a young age.
If Richardson had indications (and production) that he could work to improve like Hurts, he'd be a legit top-5 pick. The problem is Richardson was not very good his final year at UF.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:44 pm to Jaydeaux
Richardson can come in and do what a justin fields is doing in the league. Make a few throws, get it done on the ground. The hope being that the mechanics are worked out during the process
It took Josh Allen 3 years into the league to figure things out. Everyone wants the next big thing but doesn’t want to endure the growing pains that come with it. I’d much rather take a swing on Richardson or Levis over say a Hendon hooker
LINK
LINK
It took Josh Allen 3 years into the league to figure things out. Everyone wants the next big thing but doesn’t want to endure the growing pains that come with it. I’d much rather take a swing on Richardson or Levis over say a Hendon hooker
LINK
LINK
This post was edited on 2/28/23 at 12:52 pm
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:59 pm to Jaydeaux
Athletic but not a starting QB.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 1:10 pm to Jaydeaux
I just don't see what the experts see that's for sure. Physical specimen yes. NFL pro QB?
But as I often say QB projection into the nfl is a riddle wrapped by a question surrounded by a mystery.
But as I often say QB projection into the nfl is a riddle wrapped by a question surrounded by a mystery.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 1:22 pm to GynoSandberg
The Mason Rudolph & Blaine Gabert comment
Wouldn’t that depend on cost? First 2 should be first round picks, Hooker could very well fall to 3rd. If your taking a swing, let me use my 3rd before I throw away a 1st
quote:
much rather take a swing on Richardson or Levis over say a Hendon hooker
Wouldn’t that depend on cost? First 2 should be first round picks, Hooker could very well fall to 3rd. If your taking a swing, let me use my 3rd before I throw away a 1st
Posted on 2/28/23 at 1:44 pm to Jaydeaux
Take 10% from his college stats then people should know his stats as NFL QB.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 1:51 pm to Jaydeaux
He was probably going off what he thought was the best advice and what was best for him by declaring for the draft but one more season of college certainly wasn't going to hurt.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 9:22 pm to Jaydeaux
Anyone that actually watched him play a whole game and not the 1 or 2 highlights where people bounce off of him, know he is going to suck. Just like he has every year at Florida.
Posted on 3/1/23 at 9:55 am to lacajun069
quote:
Take Hendon Hooker
If you could get him in the third, you run to the podium. Groom him this year as he recovers. See what you got, and if you don't like it draft a quarterback in the first next year
Posted on 3/1/23 at 10:14 am to Jaydeaux
He’s worth the gamble
The right QB coach can develop him into something special.
Those Florida offenses weren’t exactly loaded with talent. He was throwing to bums at WR
The right QB coach can develop him into something special.
Those Florida offenses weren’t exactly loaded with talent. He was throwing to bums at WR
Posted on 3/1/23 at 12:35 pm to Jaydeaux
Hooker and Richardson will both be guys that wow with athleticism, but won't amount to much as QBs. There is a reason that the guys who can't run every other play are typically more polished as passers... they have to be.
Popular
Back to top

16







