Started By
Message

re: Does anyone in here think Richardson will be an impact guy?

Posted on 3/1/23 at 12:58 pm to
Posted by Jamohn
Das Boot
Member since Mar 2009
13606 posts
Posted on 3/1/23 at 12:58 pm to
Josh Allen is gonna be responsible for so many shitty QBs getting drafted chasing the next version of him. Fact is, his development is an absolute outlier from what he was as a prospect. Trey Lance was one. Richardson is the next. It's like when Richard Sherman had everyone reaching for tall CBs. (See Stanley Jean-Baptiste.

Anthony Richardson is much more likely to be Josh Freeman, Kyle Boller, Jim Drunkenmiller, Akili Smith, Jameis Winston, etc, etc than Josh Allen.
Posted by Suntiger
STG or BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
36333 posts
Posted on 3/1/23 at 1:17 pm to
1. Drafting a QB is a total crapshoot.
2. The only 2 QBs I’ve ever been sure would be great NFL QBs are Peyton Manning and Drew Brees.
3. I’ve been wrong about more QBs than I have been right on.

All that aside, I can’t see Richardson becoming a good NFL QB. He is super athletic and gifted, but he was such a bad QB in college. He’s a less accurate but faster Taysom Hill. A more athletic Tim Tebow.

I think he’d be great as a wildcat QB who plays TE/RB. As a full time QB? Just don’t see it.





That being said, I could be completely wrong and he may go to a team that decides to develop and build an offense around him to the point he is good.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74481 posts
Posted on 3/1/23 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

Josh Allen is gonna be responsible for so many shitty QBs getting drafted chasing the next version of him. Fact is, his development is an absolute outlier from what he was as a prospect. Trey Lance was one. Richardson is the next. It's like when Richard Sherman had everyone reaching for tall CBs. (See Stanley Jean-Baptiste.

Anthony Richardson is much more likely to be Josh Freeman, Kyle Boller, Jim Drunkenmiller, Akili Smith, Jameis Winston, etc, etc than Josh Allen.


You were in the old threads I posted shitting on Josh Allen and Lamar Jackson

Can you elaborate on what your process is when breaking down the QBs?


Posted by Jamohn
Das Boot
Member since Mar 2009
13606 posts
Posted on 3/1/23 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

You were in the old threads I posted shitting on Josh Allen and Lamar Jackson

Can you elaborate on what your process is when breaking down the QBs?

I was shitting on Josh Allen and Lamar Jackson? I don't recall. You sure? I'll admit I didn't think much of Josh Allen as a prospect and without the benefit of hindsight, I wouldn't like him coming out now. What he became from what he started out as is unprecedented.

ETA- I don't know if I've ever expressed an opinion on Lamar. I thought out of that draft class only he and Josh Rosen had star potential but had a fairly high bust likelihood. Thought D'Arnold had the highest floor but not a very high ceiling, and kinda liked Baker in the right system.
This post was edited on 3/1/23 at 2:09 pm
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
36216 posts
Posted on 3/1/23 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

He’s a less accurate but faster Taysom Hill.


I don't know about that. Hill is pretty damn fast. He ran a 4.4

If you could build a QB Weird Science style Richardson would be the prototype from a physical standpoint. He checks all of the boxes. But I wouldn't touch him in the first round. Maybe the best comp for him is Cam Newton. But in Cam's one season at Auburn there was zero doubt he was the best player on the field any any game. He was dominant. Richardson never was. He would have a few series a game where he would make jaw dropping plays...then he would disappear in the same game with bad decision making and poor accuracy.

Whoever takes him will have to be fully committed to tailoring an offense around his strengths and not just hoping to "mold" him into a prototypical NFL QB. Somewhat similar to the Eagles with Hurts. Then again, Hurst had a year of college at Oklahoma where he became a more polished passer. Richardson never had that.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74481 posts
Posted on 3/1/23 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

don't know about that. Hill is pretty damn fast. He ran a 4.4


Hill also only completed 58% of his college passes and he was 25 years old

Richardson has the best passing numbers under pressure amongst the 1st rd QBs. He was also pressured on 37% of his drop backs, the highest in the class, but was only sacked on 10% of those, lowest in the class

I’m not going to pretend to know the nuances of the position, but if Richardson’s flaws are correctable in the mind of someone who knows QB play, I’d be willing to get him in the building
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
131909 posts
Posted on 3/1/23 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

I’d be willing to get him in the building


Would you spend a mid-1st round pick on him?
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74481 posts
Posted on 3/1/23 at 2:59 pm to
No
Posted by martiallaw
Louisiana
Member since Jan 2008
1458 posts
Posted on 3/1/23 at 3:54 pm to
I think this is a guy that will drop just like Willis did last year in the draft. The more scouts and GM's dig through his film they will see what everyone else did when watching Florida. A great play followed by 6 average plays. He had a great game against Tenn. and a good game against Utah. Other than that he was pretty much an average to below average SEC QB this year and in several games, a very bad QB.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram