Started By
Message

re: Does anyone else kind of wish we would just pull out at this point?

Posted on 3/18/22 at 10:58 am to
Posted by BRL79
Member since Mar 2014
3138 posts
Posted on 3/18/22 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Jameis wants to be here

What are you basing this on? We offered him a contract before the Watson stuff started and guess what, no ink on paper
Posted by LuckyTiger57
Member since Dec 2015
1726 posts
Posted on 3/18/22 at 11:07 am to
Mickey Loomis is playing Poker. You gotta know when to hold and when to fold. I think Watson is playing the Saints. He should be here if he wants to be here or pull out and stop wasting the Saints time.
I don’t like this at all.
Posted by Stirling
Kenner
Member since Nov 2016
328 posts
Posted on 3/18/22 at 11:08 am to
I think we are to stick with what we have. 30 million under the cap. We a first second and a couple of third round picks not to lose anyone let’s go with Winston.
Posted by The_Duke
Member since Nov 2016
4691 posts
Posted on 3/18/22 at 11:09 am to
Yea---either take our offer now or we out
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63722 posts
Posted on 3/18/22 at 11:14 am to
quote:

And you're in emotional denial because you still think you have a shot with the hottie that's clearly throwing eyes elsewhere.



No I do not. And I even said that the Saints don't either. They know what's going on. There's probably a 5% chance the Atlanta deal falls through. So, you keep your hand because there's no value in folding.

Backing out now doesn't do anything positive except make emotionally weak people pretend they weren't a 2nd choice.

Posted by fwtex
Member since Nov 2019
3480 posts
Posted on 3/18/22 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

There's probably a 5% chance the Atlanta deal falls through. So, you keep your hand because there's no value in folding.



I disagree, Saints should pull the deal or start "un-sweetening" the pot hourly. Watson made a mistake here and Loomis needs to make him pay for it. He limited his deal to two so if the saints pull out then Watson no longer has leverage anywhere and he will see he overplayed his hand.

Loomis should start pulling back a #1 pick to Houston and let Watson see that his future may be staying in Houston. Play it hard Loomis. Retain your dignity and your authorty as a top GM not to mess with.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
72514 posts
Posted on 3/18/22 at 12:09 pm to
How does that make any sense? Houston wants to trade him and it’s not like Atlanta has to lower their offer in parallel with the saints. By pulling assets you essentially push him to Atlanta even harder.
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
48891 posts
Posted on 3/18/22 at 12:19 pm to
Never been big on pulling out.
Posted by Vlatket
Member since Oct 2016
7475 posts
Posted on 3/18/22 at 12:20 pm to
At this point give him the benefit of the doubt. See if he's just a slimy frick stalling for the Falcons or if he really is just taking extra time to think it over.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
82521 posts
Posted on 3/18/22 at 12:26 pm to
We either get him or bid him up so the Failclowns overpay.

Posted by Wardniner01
Member since Dec 2020
2537 posts
Posted on 3/18/22 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

Does anyone else kind of wish we would just pull out at this point?


How many drunk guys lives would have been different if they followed this simple logic. It applies to the saints
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63722 posts
Posted on 3/18/22 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

I disagree, Saints should pull the deal or start "un-sweetening" the pot hourly. Watson made a mistake here and Loomis needs to make him pay for it. He limited his deal to two so if the saints pull out then Watson no longer has leverage anywhere and he will see he overplayed his hand.


Leverage where?

If you are talking about Watson's leverage over the Falcons, presumably you'd be allowing the Falcons to get a better deal done. Is that what you want?

If you are talking about the Texans, presumably you'd be lowering the price tag for trade compensation with Atlanta. Is that what you want?

quote:

Loomis should start pulling back a #1 pick to Houston and let Watson see that his future may be staying in Houston. Play it hard Loomis. Retain your dignity and your authorty as a top GM not to mess with.



The Texans can't keep Watson. Like it or not, Watson is in control. There's nothing the Saints can do to effect the outcome other than to convince Watson (presumably by offering him a better contract.)
This post was edited on 3/18/22 at 12:36 pm
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
25969 posts
Posted on 3/18/22 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

. Is he better than Watson? probably not.


Lol
Posted by TIGERSby10
Central Lafourche
Member since Nov 2005
8107 posts
Posted on 3/18/22 at 12:39 pm to
I don't think we pull the offer yet, but there has to be some deadline established so we can move on if it doesn't happen. We can't end up with no Watson or no Winston. That would be a disaster, and I don't even like Winston that much.
Posted by fwtex
Member since Nov 2019
3480 posts
Posted on 3/18/22 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

How does that make any sense? Houston wants to trade him and it’s not like Atlanta has to lower their offer in parallel with the saints. By pulling assets you essentially push him to Atlanta even harder.


Because ultimately Houston still controls whether he is traded or not. Watson decision on his no trade clause is secondary to Houston accepting the trade offer.

So if the saints pull out and the Houston loses trade leverage then Houston can kill the deal completely no matter what Watson and Atlanta worked out. At that point Watson is stuck staying in Houston or working another less favorable deal with the other teams he told to kiss off.
Posted by fwtex
Member since Nov 2019
3480 posts
Posted on 3/18/22 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

The Texans can't keep Watson. Like it or not, Watson is in control. There's nothing the Saints can do to effect the outcome other than to convince Watson (presumably by offering him a better contract.)


He is under contract, the Texans have full control over Watson. If the Texans had to trade him and Watson had all control then his trade value would be minimal. Instead of the Texans being able to make trade demands they would be stuck taking whatever Watson and his new team decided they would get.
Posted by SaintEB
Member since Jul 2008
23711 posts
Posted on 3/18/22 at 12:59 pm to
Yup.
Posted by Geauxgurt
Member since Sep 2013
13664 posts
Posted on 3/18/22 at 12:59 pm to
I am actually hoping that he keeps pushing so much with Atlanta, and then when he agrees to go there, Houston's front office, says okay. You want ATL, now they need to sweeten the deal. He will have no recourse at that point other than to pull his approval and be stuck in Houston for another year

If I am Houston, as much as you want to get it done, I tell ATL if they want it done before Ryan's bonus hits and they are stuck with it, they add in more assets.

Watson will not be better in his prime than prime Ryan was, so I am not worried bout ATL even with him, especially when they have depleted their draft capital for the near future.
Posted by Ancient Astronaut
Member since May 2015
37434 posts
Posted on 3/18/22 at 1:00 pm to
Yep I’m done. Dude will cost us way too much anyway.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
131968 posts
Posted on 3/18/22 at 1:01 pm to
I am here finally.

Waiting through the entire weekend is insane. The writing is on the wall.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram