Started By
Message

Anybody have serious issues with this draft?

Posted on 4/29/23 at 5:24 pm
Posted by NolaTiger52
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2018
1853 posts
Posted on 4/29/23 at 5:24 pm
I’m feeling pretty content with this draft. We didn’t do anything crazy, didn’t trade crazy future assets, and took what was given to us.

We filled several holes in the roster with guys that can compete as soon as they come in to camp
Posted by Springlake Tiger
Uptown
Member since Aug 2006
15531 posts
Posted on 4/29/23 at 5:30 pm to
Seems like a solid effort.
Posted by saints5021
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2010
17408 posts
Posted on 4/29/23 at 5:31 pm to
We got good players at positions of need ... what's not to like?
Posted by tigerbait3488
River Ridge
Member since Dec 2007
10439 posts
Posted on 4/29/23 at 5:31 pm to
None…its a A
Posted by bayouboo
Member since Jan 2007
2213 posts
Posted on 4/29/23 at 5:33 pm to
Every player drafted has a chance to make the final roster or practice squad. Can’t say that every year.
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30079 posts
Posted on 4/29/23 at 5:37 pm to
The biggest red flags were addressed in the first 2 picks.

We didn't give up next year's 1st

We shot for depth with low ceiling high floors mid draft.

We shot for potential late.

That's best situation by far
This post was edited on 4/29/23 at 5:38 pm
Posted by gaetti15
AK
Member since Apr 2013
13354 posts
Posted on 4/29/23 at 5:38 pm to
PelsYaz incoming
Posted by LSU1215
Monroe
Member since Aug 2009
3661 posts
Posted on 4/29/23 at 5:39 pm to
A- grade for me. Like my rating matters anyway but I think we did good.
Posted by BigBinBR
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2023
3953 posts
Posted on 4/29/23 at 5:43 pm to
Not a bad draft. Thank God no other teams wanted to trade all of our draft picks for their 1st round pick that was only 3 ahead of us.
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
10897 posts
Posted on 4/29/23 at 5:44 pm to
There were some names I had in mind that we should go after but I'm happy with the new crop of Saints.
Posted by LSUPilot07
Member since Feb 2022
5557 posts
Posted on 4/29/23 at 5:44 pm to
Can’t complain. They saw their biggest needs and answered them. Our DL just went from terrible to having the chance to be a terror for opposing offenses. On pass downs you can kick Cam inside with Breese and then have Granderson and Foskey at DE.
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
71254 posts
Posted on 4/29/23 at 5:49 pm to
4 players we got were in Dane Bruglers top 100

Bryan Bresee (23)
Isaiah Foskey (60)
Nick Salvideri (96)
A.T. Perry (98)
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64124 posts
Posted on 4/29/23 at 5:57 pm to
I think people will find those four are in almost all top 100
Posted by Rand AlThor
Member since Jan 2014
9369 posts
Posted on 4/29/23 at 6:01 pm to
I don’t pretend to be smarter than an nfl team, I’m just a fan, so I give that up front

But it feels like a lot of the players we took would have been there for a while if we took them. I know the media isn’t always right but some of this stuff was consensus across the board so it’s kinda hard to stomach

I like the guys though if you take the draft spots out of it though

One other thought… feels like all of the guys besides Bresee have to learn a lot to even make a notable impact. So this feels like a future investment draft but not really a 2023 impact draft.
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
23474 posts
Posted on 4/29/23 at 6:01 pm to
overall, i thought they did a great job early and late, but the middle is a little questionable...

but overall, good job not wasting future assets, and addressing main areas of need
Posted by armsdealer
Member since Feb 2016
11492 posts
Posted on 4/29/23 at 6:08 pm to
I am not a fan of THIS franchise picking a player with such a big injury history so early. I don't understand the QB flyer but seems like any QB pick is a crapshoot.

Honestly, I am not sure I can get excited by a DA led team as I don't think the team can get excited by a DA led team.
Posted by Suntiger
BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
32851 posts
Posted on 4/29/23 at 6:09 pm to
quote:

I know the media isn’t always right but some of this stuff was consensus across the board so it’s kinda hard to stomach


Only if you look at it from the media’s perspective focusing on the Saints. Players “fall” because teams want their guy and don’t rely upon rankings from Kiper, PFF, CBS sports, etc. that we look at for weeks.

Not that you’re wrong for looking at it from that perspective, we all do. But we have no idea who will get picked, who will fall, what kind of deals teams are and aren’t willing to make and how well a team knows and wants a player. We make it way more complicated than it is. Don’t treat it like supermarket sweep or something; if you want a player, get the player.
Posted by BRL79
Member since Mar 2014
2952 posts
Posted on 4/29/23 at 6:15 pm to
We filled our needs without having to reach for project players. I like it
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
8664 posts
Posted on 4/29/23 at 6:16 pm to
I like a couple of the late picks. But I think we screwed up not picking
Branch in the 2nd,
One of the TN receivers in the 3rd notably Tilman
And Antonio Johnson instead of the Minny guy.
Posted by Load Toad
Haughton, LA
Member since Aug 2008
1909 posts
Posted on 4/29/23 at 6:25 pm to
Saints have depth in areas we needed.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram