Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

2026 mock has us taking qb

Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:18 pm
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
11848 posts
Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:18 pm
https://www.si.com/way-too-early-2026-nfl-mock-draft

Total waste of burning a top 40 pick if it happens.

Think it’s more likely we wait till 2027 for manning. Gonna be hard to pass on yiur son if he’s on the board though.
This post was edited on 4/30/25 at 10:26 pm
Posted by Midget Death Squad
Meme Magic
Member since Oct 2008
26887 posts
Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:59 pm to
What did last year’s firs mock immediately after the draft assign to us? I sure hope it was someone good! These mocks are super accurate, important and needed!
This post was edited on 5/1/25 at 9:51 am
Posted by SportsGuyNOLA
New Orleans, LA
Member since May 2014
19932 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 12:04 am to
quote:

Total waste of burning a top 40 pick if it happens.


Is it?

If Shuck works out AND we draft Arch we’ll be set AND deep at the QB position for a decade
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
68769 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 5:54 am to
If we somehow get a franchise qb in the next year or so wasting a pick or two doesn’t really matter THAT much.
Posted by DeathValley85
Member since May 2011
17962 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 6:13 am to
You draft QBs until you find one…
Posted by P bean
br
Member since Dec 2006
4667 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 6:15 am to
Get a tampon quick and insert
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
18992 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 6:16 am to
How many pre draft mocks had them going OT this year?
Posted by Dnorma2
Member since Sep 2024
219 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 6:17 am to
Look at all the mocks right after the draft last year and see how accurate they were … not very accurate on anything … not accurate on the predictions of where nfl teams would be drafting or the players being drafted …. And a future mock like that would be lucky to have one team to player right … the only thing those mocks are good for is to get an idea as of general player pool as of right now of who may be high on the board .. but with another college season to go that doesn’t mean all that much
This post was edited on 5/1/25 at 6:21 am
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
13812 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 6:29 am to
quote:

If Shuck works out AND we draft Arch


fwiw, IMO it's impossible for both of these things to happen.

This post was edited on 5/1/25 at 6:30 am
Posted by Bayou
Boudin, LA
Member since Feb 2005
38979 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 6:46 am to
Nuss Bus comin' to da City!
Posted by Sleepy_Tiger
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Aug 2021
8963 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 6:48 am to
how in the frick do you know he’s a waste he hasn’t played one down yet in the NFL frick some of you. People are goddamn idiots.

Talk about pre-judging.
Posted by Sleepy_Tiger
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Aug 2021
8963 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 6:50 am to
quote:

Nuss Bus comin' to da City!


is that the same bus that was going to carry Jackson dart or Sanders to the New Orleans Saints?
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
171763 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 7:07 am to
quote:

Total waste of burning a top 40 pick if it happens.


Incredibly dumb statement.
Posted by LSUZombie
A Cemetery Near You
Member since Apr 2008
29368 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 8:03 am to
quote:

Total waste of burning a top 40 pick if it happens.


quote:

2026 mock has us taking qb


Yes, overreacting to a 2026 mock a week after the 2025 draft is certainly a choice
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
11848 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 8:14 am to
quote:

how in the frick do you know he’s a waste he hasn’t played one down yet in the NFL frick some of you. People are goddamn idiots.


Reading comprehension is not your strong suit I see. If, if we draft a qb in the first round next year, then yes burning a top 40 pick on Shough was a total waste. Some really good players were picked after us at 40.
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
11848 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 8:16 am to
quote:

Incredibly dumb statement.


Wasting high draft picks on quarterbacks back to back years wouldn’t be dumb at all. Especially when you have a bottom 3 roster.
This post was edited on 5/1/25 at 8:17 am
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
171763 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 8:40 am to
quote:


Wasting high draft picks on quarterbacks back to back years wouldn’t be dumb at all. Especially when you have a bottom 3 roster.


We have no idea what we have in Shough right now.
This is purely hypothesizing.
If in this event we do draft a top qb in the draft, the guy would be special and then we would have a qb room with all rookie contract qb's, which would greatly accelerate our ability to put our cap past in the past and eat carr's contract quicker meanwhile elevating the most important positional room in football. There's teams paying 10 plus million for a backup qb, if that ends up being shough's role in year 2 or 3 then so be it.
All in all, its still you wanting to be drama for little reason.
Posted by statman34
Member since Feb 2011
3248 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 9:39 am to
Why do these people do a mock draft a year in advance? They can't even remotely predict it a day out much less a year out. These things are such a waste of time. Have they ever been productively accurate at all?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram