- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2026 mock has us taking qb
Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:18 pm
Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:18 pm
https://www.si.com/way-too-early-2026-nfl-mock-draft
Total waste of burning a top 40 pick if it happens.
Think it’s more likely we wait till 2027 for manning. Gonna be hard to pass on yiur son if he’s on the board though.
Total waste of burning a top 40 pick if it happens.
Think it’s more likely we wait till 2027 for manning. Gonna be hard to pass on yiur son if he’s on the board though.
This post was edited on 4/30/25 at 10:26 pm
16
Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:59 pm to Townedrunkard
What did last year’s firs mock immediately after the draft assign to us? I sure hope it was someone good! These mocks are super accurate, important and needed!
This post was edited on 5/1/25 at 9:51 am
Posted on 5/1/25 at 12:04 am to Townedrunkard
quote:
Total waste of burning a top 40 pick if it happens.
Is it?
If Shuck works out AND we draft Arch we’ll be set AND deep at the QB position for a decade
Posted on 5/1/25 at 5:54 am to Townedrunkard
If we somehow get a franchise qb in the next year or so wasting a pick or two doesn’t really matter THAT much.
Posted on 5/1/25 at 6:13 am to Townedrunkard
You draft QBs until you find one…
Posted on 5/1/25 at 6:15 am to Townedrunkard
Get a tampon quick and insert
Posted on 5/1/25 at 6:16 am to Townedrunkard
How many pre draft mocks had them going OT this year?
Posted on 5/1/25 at 6:17 am to DeathValley85
Look at all the mocks right after the draft last year and see how accurate they were … not very accurate on anything … not accurate on the predictions of where nfl teams would be drafting or the players being drafted …. And a future mock like that would be lucky to have one team to player right … the only thing those mocks are good for is to get an idea as of general player pool as of right now of who may be high on the board .. but with another college season to go that doesn’t mean all that much
This post was edited on 5/1/25 at 6:21 am
Posted on 5/1/25 at 6:29 am to SportsGuyNOLA
quote:
If Shuck works out AND we draft Arch
fwiw, IMO it's impossible for both of these things to happen.
This post was edited on 5/1/25 at 6:30 am
Posted on 5/1/25 at 6:46 am to Snipe
Nuss Bus comin' to da City! 
Posted on 5/1/25 at 6:48 am to Townedrunkard
how in the frick do you know he’s a waste he hasn’t played one down yet in the NFL frick some of you. People are goddamn idiots.
Talk about pre-judging.
Talk about pre-judging.
Posted on 5/1/25 at 6:50 am to Bayou
quote:
Nuss Bus comin' to da City!
is that the same bus that was going to carry Jackson dart or Sanders to the New Orleans Saints?
Posted on 5/1/25 at 7:07 am to Townedrunkard
quote:
Total waste of burning a top 40 pick if it happens.
Incredibly dumb statement.
Posted on 5/1/25 at 8:03 am to Townedrunkard
quote:
Total waste of burning a top 40 pick if it happens.
quote:
2026 mock has us taking qb
Yes, overreacting to a 2026 mock a week after the 2025 draft is certainly a choice
Posted on 5/1/25 at 8:14 am to Sleepy_Tiger
quote:
how in the frick do you know he’s a waste he hasn’t played one down yet in the NFL frick some of you. People are goddamn idiots.
Reading comprehension is not your strong suit I see. If, if we draft a qb in the first round next year, then yes burning a top 40 pick on Shough was a total waste. Some really good players were picked after us at 40.
Posted on 5/1/25 at 8:16 am to Chad504boy
quote:
Incredibly dumb statement.
Wasting high draft picks on quarterbacks back to back years wouldn’t be dumb at all. Especially when you have a bottom 3 roster.
This post was edited on 5/1/25 at 8:17 am
Posted on 5/1/25 at 8:40 am to Townedrunkard
quote:
Wasting high draft picks on quarterbacks back to back years wouldn’t be dumb at all. Especially when you have a bottom 3 roster.
We have no idea what we have in Shough right now.
This is purely hypothesizing.
If in this event we do draft a top qb in the draft, the guy would be special and then we would have a qb room with all rookie contract qb's, which would greatly accelerate our ability to put our cap past in the past and eat carr's contract quicker meanwhile elevating the most important positional room in football. There's teams paying 10 plus million for a backup qb, if that ends up being shough's role in year 2 or 3 then so be it.
All in all, its still you wanting to be drama for little reason.
Posted on 5/1/25 at 9:39 am to Townedrunkard
Why do these people do a mock draft a year in advance? They can't even remotely predict it a day out much less a year out. These things are such a waste of time. Have they ever been productively accurate at all?
Posted on 5/2/25 at 2:29 am to Townedrunkard
Nope. Won’t happen. Not in the 1st rd anyway.
As long as Loomis is GM you can just about bet the house that the Saints will pick an OL in the 1st rd.
As long as Loomis is GM you can just about bet the house that the Saints will pick an OL in the 1st rd.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 9:40 am to Townedrunkard
quote:
Total waste of burning a top 40 pick if it happens.
Finding a QB is hard. Try to you get one.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News