1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Willie Green: "Unlikely to see Zion before the Allstar break, but we'll see"
Posted on 2/7/23 at 6:39 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Posted on 2/7/23 at 6:39 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Did anybody really think he was going to be back in 3 weeks? Holding him out to try and make a run in the last 20% of the season and the playoffs.
Posted on 2/7/23 at 6:43 pm to PappaSwolio
quote:
Originally said at least 3 weeks
That is not what was said
Posted on 2/7/23 at 7:01 pm to Mickey Goldmill
No Zion on the bench. First time he hasn't been there this season, that I remember.
Posted on 2/7/23 at 7:10 pm to eyeran
Jen's update sounded like an unspoken setback.
Posted on 2/7/23 at 7:12 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Wishful thinking, hoping to see him in the Garden in two weeks.
Posted on 2/7/23 at 9:12 pm to PUB
quote:
Did anybody really think he was going to be back in 3 weeks?
Today was 5 weeks.
Posted on 2/8/23 at 1:25 am to The Hurricane
see you there. if the ticket prices fall in the garden because he’s out i’m not going to be pleased
Posted on 2/8/23 at 6:53 am to eyeran
Think he went to LA to witness the King break the scoring record.
It was all in the script, didn’t you read it? Lol
It was all in the script, didn’t you read it? Lol
Posted on 2/8/23 at 8:46 am to Mickey Goldmill
I know Hammy's are tricky and I'm not a doctor.
But originally it was 3 weeks. Then when we got to 3 weeks Jen Hale comes on a broadcast and says "Great news - We're told Zion is right on schedule and could be back in 2 weeks".
And now it's been 2 weeks since that report and we have this.
I think we're just going to have to accept the fact that our two best players are probably never going to play much more than 50 games in a regular season.
And I guess we can debate to what extent that hurts us, but I could definitely list a few ways I think it does.
But originally it was 3 weeks. Then when we got to 3 weeks Jen Hale comes on a broadcast and says "Great news - We're told Zion is right on schedule and could be back in 2 weeks".
And now it's been 2 weeks since that report and we have this.
I think we're just going to have to accept the fact that our two best players are probably never going to play much more than 50 games in a regular season.
And I guess we can debate to what extent that hurts us, but I could definitely list a few ways I think it does.
Posted on 2/8/23 at 8:49 am to Tiger Ugly
It was that they would re-evaluate him in 3 weeks. Which they did.
However, I have always agreed that this team does a lousy job of communicating the truth of injuries to the fans.
Just say, "this is likely a 4-6 week injury, but they are tricky and could be shorter or longer. We will see where he is in 3 weeks."
Anyway, even if he is healed, our conservative training staff likely does not see the benefit of bringing him back before the ASB and would prefer the extra conditioning.
However, I have always agreed that this team does a lousy job of communicating the truth of injuries to the fans.
Just say, "this is likely a 4-6 week injury, but they are tricky and could be shorter or longer. We will see where he is in 3 weeks."
Anyway, even if he is healed, our conservative training staff likely does not see the benefit of bringing him back before the ASB and would prefer the extra conditioning.
Posted on 2/8/23 at 8:52 am to Tiger Ugly
quote:
But originally it was 3 weeks. Then when we got to 3 weeks Jen Hale comes on a broadcast and says "Great news - We're told Zion is right on schedule and could be back in 2 weeks".
I don't always get the local broadcast, but I think you are wrong on some of the specific words that you think you heard. We were told he'd be reevaluated in 3 weeks. Then they said he's progressing well and they check again in 2 weeks, which is now. Most are expecting to hear a more formal update today than we got yesterday. They never said he'd be back in 3 weeks and then he'd be back in 2 weeks.
This post was edited on 2/8/23 at 8:54 am
Posted on 2/8/23 at 9:27 am to TigerinATL
quote:They never told us it was a grade 2 hamstring pull, but the way he is tracking suggests it is exactly that and he is progressing on time for that level of injury.
I don't always get the local broadcast, but I think you are wrong on some of the specific words that you think you heard. We were told he'd be reevaluated in 3 weeks. Then they said he's progressing well and they check again in 2 weeks, which is now. Most are expecting to hear a more formal update today than we got yesterday. They never said he'd be back in 3 weeks and then he'd be back in 2 weeks.
Posted on 2/8/23 at 9:43 am to TigerinATL
quote:
don't always get the local broadcast, but I think you are wrong on some of the specific words that you think you heard. We were told he'd be reevaluated in 3 weeks.
I will concede this point - I think that is likely what was reported.
quote:I think Jen Hale misrepresented this one....as she without question said he was on schedule to return in two weeks.
Then they said he's progressing well and they check again in 2 weeks,
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News