Started By
Message

re: What happens if we can’t find a good enough trade for BI?

Posted on 6/1/24 at 8:12 pm to
Posted by SulphursFinest
Lafayette
Member since Jan 2015
11363 posts
Posted on 6/1/24 at 8:12 pm to
Defense is so incredibly overrated in this era
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112626 posts
Posted on 6/1/24 at 8:16 pm to
quote:

What happens if we can’t find a good enough trade for BI?
Pain
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
11544 posts
Posted on 6/1/24 at 8:55 pm to
LINK

Looks like pels prefer Murray.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13490 posts
Posted on 6/2/24 at 12:29 am to
quote:


LINK

Looks like pels prefer Murray.
They are just regurgitating Clark's story from about a week ago.
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
17410 posts
Posted on 6/2/24 at 5:36 am to
I know they would prefer Murray over Trae because Murray fits Willie’s coaching style better, but they should say frick Willie and get the better talent
Posted by jrobic4
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
12203 posts
Posted on 6/2/24 at 7:16 am to
quote:

If they can't trade BI


To me, in a vacuum, trading BI is addition by subtraction. Trey gets the minutes he needs to develop into a true 2nd star. If you don't think he can be, might as well trade him while he has the most value...

I'm NOT advocating trading Trey, BTW
This post was edited on 6/2/24 at 7:17 am
Posted by Pels247
Member since May 2024
27 posts
Posted on 6/2/24 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Trey gets the minutes he needs to develop into a true 2nd star.


I think this is an important part of the trade discussion. Do we think Trey can develop into a legit 2nd star?

If his ceiling is a high quality role player then you probably need to go for someone like a Trae Young or Dejounte Murray to be that number 2. If we think he has the potential to be a legit number 2, then you can probably look for more high quality role players that also are good fits, someone like Jarrett Allen, and try to get multiple pieces in a trade.
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
17410 posts
Posted on 6/2/24 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Trae Young or Dejounte Murray to be that number 2.


Ummm, one of those are not like the other
Posted by Pels247
Member since May 2024
27 posts
Posted on 6/2/24 at 8:50 am to
Yes, Trae is more of a 1 to Murray being more of a 2. I guess I meant more of another all-star caliber player to pair with Zion. The question remains, do we think Trey can be legit Robin to Zion.
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
17410 posts
Posted on 6/2/24 at 8:56 am to
Murray is more of a 3 not a 2

If Trey can develop into that 2, which is unlikely, then sure Murray would be a good get for us, but I would much prefer Zion as the 1 with Trae as the 2 and Trey as the 3

Ensuring we get a legitimate high level all pro type talent next to Zion takes a whole bunch of pressure off of Trey and allows him to just develop his game and not have to press to be the best possible version of himself right away.
This post was edited on 6/2/24 at 8:59 am
Posted by Pistol44
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2019
2298 posts
Posted on 6/2/24 at 9:28 am to
quote:

If Trey can develop into that 2


I don’t understand when TM3 has been a 2 most of his career here. He really started playing more frontcourt when team decided Zion is wing/point. TM3 played a ton of 4, and although not a paint protector, held his own in the scheme and became a very good rebounder. Offensively, he most importantly stretched the floor above the key. He’s not natural with the ball but doesn’t have to be in their offense, until he does.
This post was edited on 6/2/24 at 9:29 am
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
17410 posts
Posted on 6/2/24 at 9:36 am to
I think you’re misunderstanding what I said when I’m talking about 1,2,3 roles.

1st star, 2nd star, 3rd star

Ideally you would hope Trey can develop into that 2nd star, but it’s unlikely. We need to trade for that 2nd star, and that’s not Murray either.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62446 posts
Posted on 6/2/24 at 10:03 am to
Middleton and Jrue were more #3s than #2s, so it can be done if Zion goes MVP level, but that’s part of what has me leaning Trae despite the red flags. As long as we get one of Trae/Murray/Garland we will have a good enough player to trade up to better later.
This post was edited on 6/2/24 at 10:06 am
Posted by Pistol44
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2019
2298 posts
Posted on 6/2/24 at 10:07 am to
My bad, I did. To your point I think your 1,2, and 3 are in terms of impactful at high competitive moments, and availability.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
36480 posts
Posted on 6/2/24 at 10:31 am to
quote:

Defense is so incredibly overrated in this era

The 3 best teams in the playoffs this season all have elite defenses.

The Mavs have had the best defense since the trade deadline and Boston has had the best defense for the season.
Posted by LSUPilot07
Member since Feb 2022
8008 posts
Posted on 6/2/24 at 11:01 am to
Yea I agree, defense absolutely matters still in this game. The big drawback on Trae Young is his atrocious defense and small size but the fricker can score. His contract would also be a huge hit to us. It would mean you’d have to go very cheap at center. He would bring that 1b to Zion’s 1a no doubt though. He’s a better talent than Murray. but Murray gives you a big PG at 6’5” that is a very good on ball defender that would take some pressure off Herb being our entire defense. Teams wouldn’t be able to screen Herb out of the play with Murray there and he’s a solid 20 a game scorer making half of Young’s contract. Both have their merits and drawbacks.
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
17410 posts
Posted on 6/2/24 at 11:06 am to
quote:

His contract would also be a huge hit to us. It would mean you’d have to go very cheap at center.

This is simply not true at all

We could do a Trae trade and still trade for Jarret Allen
This post was edited on 6/2/24 at 11:12 am
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
36480 posts
Posted on 6/2/24 at 11:12 am to
quote:

His contract would also be a huge hit to us. It would mean you’d have to go very cheap at center.

IMO, if you get Trae you have to trade CJ in some sort of deal that brings in a rim protecting center. You also need to keep Herb.

A Zion/Trae pairing has a much higher ceiling than a Zion/Murray pairing, IMO, Murray is more of a high end 3rd option than a second option.
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
17410 posts
Posted on 6/2/24 at 11:21 am to
quote:

IMO, if you get Trae you have to trade CJ in some sort of deal that brings in a rim protecting center.

You don’t have to, you can bring CJ off the bench as a super 6th man.

Ingram, Nance and Dyson works salary wise for Trae and Allen.
Posted by LSUPilot07
Member since Feb 2022
8008 posts
Posted on 6/2/24 at 11:28 am to
It depends what the price is for Allen. We wouldn’t have BI to be the centerpiece of a deal. It would have to be draft capital. I think it would take 3 1st rounders to get Allen. Luckily we have it to give but that would be the end of us having extra draft capital so a Young, Herb, Trey, Zion, Allen starting 5 with CJ coming off the bench or trading him would be a make or break move. If they don’t win with that there are no do-overs. The entire thing would have to be blown up.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram