- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trey to Blazers proposal
Posted on 6/30/26 at 5:45 pm
Posted on 6/30/26 at 5:45 pm
Pro Pels talk podcast had some interesting banter a couple weeks ago about a potential Trey Murphy trade for Donovan Clingan and one of their guards/wings, potentially Shaeden Sharpe or maybe Camara. Clingan is the perfect type of center that we've been looking for. He stretches the floor, can protect the rim, and doesn't have a high usage rate, and he's cost controlled for 2 more years.
The blazers have way too many guards now after the Ja trade, and they need to unload somebody. They just resigned Robert Williams for 3 years, and they also have Yang Hanson, so they do have some depth in the front court, so their center room wouldn't be totally bare.
Would you do this as the base of the trade?
Pels: send out TM3
Blazers: send out Clingan & Sharpe
Would you have to include Missi, Matkovic, or something else to sweeten the pot and give the blazers some center depth in return? We just resigned DeAndre Jordan to be our 3rd string center/player coach.
Why would the blazers do this?
Would either team need to give up a 1st round pick up sweeten the pot? Which team would have to give up the pick .
Either way, with our 2 glaring holes at C and SG last year, we can patch both of them with this type of trade. Flame away my friends...
The blazers have way too many guards now after the Ja trade, and they need to unload somebody. They just resigned Robert Williams for 3 years, and they also have Yang Hanson, so they do have some depth in the front court, so their center room wouldn't be totally bare.
Would you do this as the base of the trade?
Pels: send out TM3
Blazers: send out Clingan & Sharpe
Would you have to include Missi, Matkovic, or something else to sweeten the pot and give the blazers some center depth in return? We just resigned DeAndre Jordan to be our 3rd string center/player coach.
Why would the blazers do this?
Would either team need to give up a 1st round pick up sweeten the pot? Which team would have to give up the pick .
Either way, with our 2 glaring holes at C and SG last year, we can patch both of them with this type of trade. Flame away my friends...
4
Posted on 6/30/26 at 5:50 pm to chhese007
They were not willing to give up Clingan for Jaylen Brown. Certainly not doing it for Trey,
Posted on 6/30/26 at 5:59 pm to chhese007
Clingan is going to have to produce at a higher rate than one made 3ptr per game on three attempts before I consider him a floor spacing big. Sure, those attempt numbers may be slightly below Turner, but teams will be more than happy conceding offensive possessions that end in a Clingan 3pt attempt.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 5:59 pm to NOSHAU
But wasn't it filler, clingan, Sharpe, and multiple picks?
We could very well just ask for less.
That being said - my biggest gripe is definitely sharpe's playoff run was horrid. It's scary how big a drop off it was and potentially having to pay him big money is terrifying.
We could very well just ask for less.
That being said - my biggest gripe is definitely sharpe's playoff run was horrid. It's scary how big a drop off it was and potentially having to pay him big money is terrifying.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 8:56 pm to htran90
Who says no?
Posted on 6/30/26 at 9:00 pm to chhese007
Yep, bring it on.
Dejounte/Fears
Sharpe/Poole
Herb/Bey
Zion/Queen
Klingan/Missi/Jordan
No way it works out that well for us though.
Dejounte/Fears
Sharpe/Poole
Herb/Bey
Zion/Queen
Klingan/Missi/Jordan
No way it works out that well for us though.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 9:29 pm to six4lsu
Pels say no. I like Sharpe to an extent, but not enough to accept 2 shite picks and 2 shite players as the other part of the package.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 9:45 pm to SenGooner
You obviously haven't seen Garza play. He is a player.
Also one pick is Cenac. If that does anything for you.
Also one pick is Cenac. If that does anything for you.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 10:36 pm to six4lsu
quote:
six4lsu
I don’t know why you’re getting downvoted so much personally. I’m not in the “Trade TM3” camp, but this is the first trade that makes some sense for us if I’m reading that Orlando pick right (unprotected 2028 Orlando). And one I could see the other teams doing with their current situations playing out.
- could be lottery ticket draft pick? Check
- Immediate prospects? Check
- a low floor/high ceiling scoring prospect? Check
- more in line with current timeline? Check
ETA: I think Portland would have to compensate in place of the Cenac spot somehow, this is a tough pill for Boston even with Brown’s depressed market.
This post was edited on 6/30/26 at 10:41 pm
Posted on 6/30/26 at 10:40 pm to six4lsu
I'm intrigued by Cenac. And I understand the other 2 dudes in the package can shoot. I honestly would want more draft compensation with a chance to become something meaningful or be used in trades. Maybe 2 more far out picks and I would be more on board. I truly think 15 teams are after Trey. I really don't want to settle on his trade. Someone is going to have to pay the piper.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:31 am to SenGooner
That's fair. Maybe the Blazers throw in a pick & a swap and you remove a celtics player.
It's never going to happen anyway ??
It's never going to happen anyway ??
Posted on 7/1/26 at 5:51 am to chhese007
Why do we keep trying get rid of Trey under $30M annually. New guy hopefully help with his dribbling
Posted on 7/1/26 at 10:17 am to Stamps74
As awesome as Trey is, has limitations in his game that not aren't so obvious to the rest of the NBA. His ball handling, defense, passing skills, and primary shot creation skills might get marginally better, but they are likely not getting drastically better this far into his career.
He's a very good #3 on a contending team, but probably will never be a #1a, #1b, or #2. His value may never be higher, it might be closer to a #2 in the league right now. The longer you hold on to him, the higher chance he becomes an Ingram or Zion in provided perceived value once the rest of the league realizes his limitations.
He's a very good #3 on a contending team, but probably will never be a #1a, #1b, or #2. His value may never be higher, it might be closer to a #2 in the league right now. The longer you hold on to him, the higher chance he becomes an Ingram or Zion in provided perceived value once the rest of the league realizes his limitations.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 10:20 am to chhese007
They already set his price and have made him available if the price lines up. If someone ponies up, they'll move him. That's how it should be.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 11:56 am to supe12sta12z
Completely agree, we didn't get a deal done before or at the draft, but there may be a secondary market for players once the 1st round of free agency passes and teams don't hit on their targets.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:07 pm to chhese007
We just seen Kessler go for 2 1sts and 2 swaps
Trey should fetch that at a minimum with a player
Trey should fetch that at a minimum with a player
Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:13 pm to Soggymoss
If the pistons rumor is real I’d try to get a swap as well
This post was edited on 7/1/26 at 12:14 pm
Posted on 7/1/26 at 12:29 pm to Macintosh
What’s McNamara twitter these days?
Posted on 7/1/26 at 2:29 pm to Macintosh
quote:
the pistons rumor is real I’d try to get a swap as well
I wonder if Cleveland would be interested in a reunion with Lavert while saving a bunch of money?
Pistons: Trey, Hawk
Pels: Allen, Holland, 1 1st
Cavs: Lavert, 2 1sts
Posted on 7/3/26 at 11:52 pm to Soggymoss
If we're not going big game hunting, and instead looking for a backup big for a platoon lineup, Quentin Post or Nick Richards are the best of what's left. Post offers some floor spacing, and Richards can bang a little down low.
I doubt we're going into the season with the current C rotation, we're likely waiting out the market to see what opportunities may arise once LeBron signs with a new team.
I doubt we're going into the season with the current C rotation, we're likely waiting out the market to see what opportunities may arise once LeBron signs with a new team.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News