Started By
Message

re: The Win Now Doc Rivers Trade Thread

Posted on 9/29/20 at 6:52 pm to
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9758 posts
Posted on 9/29/20 at 6:52 pm to
We would make it work. He is not a conventional PF. He is one of the best stretch bigs in the league and what everyone says we need. He is a tough, gritty defender and has thrived on multiple teams. Including spearheading 2 surprise playoff runs out in nowhere the past two seasons. But I love Zion at Center. In our "death line up", isn't that where he would play?
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115500 posts
Posted on 9/29/20 at 6:56 pm to
Your deal gives up way too much on our end for a Sign and Trade of a 32 year old player.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9758 posts
Posted on 9/29/20 at 7:13 pm to
Every list I have saw has Gallinari as a top 5 FA. The big two, Ingram and Davis, likely aren't going anywhere. That leaves guys like Van Fleet, Derozan, Harrell.. Gallinari is the best fit for us. But he is going to get offered big money.

Supposedly he wants to go to a good team. I saw a deal where the Lakers were going to go big after him in a S$T. But they really don't have pieces that OKC want. There could be multiple suitors and a bidding war.

Would there be an advantage to doing the trade before FA starts? Is that possible? What kind of package would get it done?

I guess its not a sexy name. But wouldn't he make us much better?
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115500 posts
Posted on 9/29/20 at 7:27 pm to
Because this year’s FA crop is hot garbage. 2021 is much better.

Most teams are going to go for short term deals or be frugal at best.

There’s literally no chance that Gal gets 100 million. And sign and trades outside of Paul George scenarios rarely ever get that much.

Maybe a bottom feeder team will offer him something big but 100 seems very unlikely.
Posted by Baron
Member since Dec 2014
1636 posts
Posted on 9/29/20 at 7:38 pm to
quote:

But I love Zion at Center. In our "death line up", isn't that where he would play?


Theoretically in the future, sure. But two major problems in the present:
1. Our “death line up” with Zion at the 5 last year couldn’t stop a nose bleed, and I don’t see that changing by next year
2. “death line ups”, similar to what GSW had, worked because the lengthy, versatile wing defenders they had at the 2-4 positions. Not only is Zion not Green on the defensive side next year, but Gallo, Ingram, and Jrue aren’t exactly Iggy, Durant, and Klay either.

When people say that the perfect fit next to Zion is a stretch big, that’s only on one side of the court. So far, Zion has shown he needs someone who can protect the rim on the other side of the floor. Now, hopefully that changes and Zion reaches his full potential and becomes Draymond in a small ball lineup, but that ain’t happening next year or probably for a few years.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9758 posts
Posted on 9/29/20 at 7:39 pm to
Ok. Got it.. So we don't want him at all? Even a 2/48 with an option on the 2nd season?
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115500 posts
Posted on 9/29/20 at 7:43 pm to
I’d love to have Gall.

I’m not trading all that for him though.
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
14160 posts
Posted on 9/29/20 at 7:51 pm to
No, you don't pay a guy that you know would be coming off the bench 20+ million a year.
Posted by TechTiger
Running an easy 10
Member since Feb 2007
1349 posts
Posted on 9/29/20 at 8:10 pm to
LINK

Piggybacking off the Lonzo trade idea with the Knicks....

Knicks receive Lonzo and swap #8 for our #13, and they send out Wayne Ellington and the Dallas 2021 1st

Thunder send Chris Paul to the Pels, and receive NAW, Miller, #8, Dallas 2021 1st, Cleveland 2021 2nd, Cleveland 2022 2nd

Pels get Chris Paul and Ellington while still keeping future picks.

This would of course be considering we get Doc here. Knicks might not do this, but they could try to take on Wiggins and trade up to get #2 and reunite the Ball brothers.
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
14160 posts
Posted on 9/29/20 at 8:32 pm to
Good God no, that is an extreme overpay. I wouldn't send any draft picks at all in that deal to OKC.

Not to mention, the salaries don't line up, we don't have 20+ million in cap space to make it happen.
Posted by TechTiger
Running an easy 10
Member since Feb 2007
1349 posts
Posted on 9/29/20 at 8:48 pm to
No we end up being a tax team, and we would have to make the deal before signing Ingram to his max. The money works but only before singing Ingram.

Are we really giving up that much though? OKC will get offers just as good from other teams desperate to win. Again this is with Doc coaching us, and we are win now.

We give up a first and NAW, and 2 future second round picks which who cares....and keep all our future assets.
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
14160 posts
Posted on 9/29/20 at 9:05 pm to
You're giving up Ball, NAW and 3 1sts (#13, then #8, and the future 1st)

And that's not how it works, Ingram's cap hold is around 21 million. AT most if we renounce everyone but Ingram, we will have about 7-9 million in cap space.

You would still need to cut another 7 million or so from that deal, which would mean sending out JJ.
This post was edited on 9/29/20 at 9:06 pm
Posted by LSU Fan 90812
A man more eviler than Skeletor.
Member since Feb 2005
50655 posts
Posted on 9/29/20 at 9:07 pm to
doc rivers is terrible.
Posted by TechTiger
Running an easy 10
Member since Feb 2007
1349 posts
Posted on 9/29/20 at 9:08 pm to
Ingram’s current cap hold for his qualifying offer is 9.5 million.

I put the link in the post, so the money works. We are giving up a first, NAW, and Lonzo for Paul essentially.....
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115500 posts
Posted on 9/29/20 at 9:09 pm to
Objectively he’s not terrible. He’s got a better win percentage than any coach we’ve ever had.

He’s just not a great coach, as some try to portray him as. He’s a good one.

He’s in my opinion the guy before the guy.

But regardless, I think he goes to Philly or Houston.
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
14160 posts
Posted on 9/29/20 at 9:23 pm to
It's 21.6 million.

His qualifying offer is 9.5 million (not a chance we sign him to that), the cap hold is 300% of his current salary.

A future first, NAW, Lonzo (equivalent of #8) and #13.

That is WAYYYYY to much
This post was edited on 9/29/20 at 9:26 pm
Posted by TechTiger
Running an easy 10
Member since Feb 2007
1349 posts
Posted on 9/29/20 at 10:08 pm to
Well I’m not sure why it works on the trade machine then....

But if you know you are already moving on from Lonzo, and you are using the future draft capital form that trade along with the first this year(which is undervalued) and NAW. I really don’t think that’s too much of a reach.

I’d rather not give up that much for Paul either, but if you really think we could make that happen for less then that would be great.
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
14160 posts
Posted on 9/29/20 at 10:13 pm to
Because they are basing it off his Qualifying Offer, which is basically just a 1 year 9.5 deal (which we would never insult him by offering)

If you really are moving on from Lonzo, you send out Lonzo to NYK for #8 and a future 1st (no need to give them #13)

You don't send out all that and gut your young talent and draft picks for a 35 year old point guard who's had a lengthy injury history. I'd love CP3 here, but the cost outweighs the benefit with him, unless we are getting him for basically a salary match, which even then our only players that we can send out salary wise to match would be too much.
This post was edited on 9/29/20 at 10:15 pm
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
3564 posts
Posted on 9/29/20 at 10:18 pm to
Someone will have to give up a good bit to get CP and it really isn't worth it at 40 million when we have more flexibility elsewhere.

Gallinari is a FA. I'm not sure what contract he is looking for but I sure as hell would take him for 20mil or less. Having Gallo, Hart, BI, and Jrue together when they can all stretch the floor and play different positions would be great.
Posted by TechTiger
Running an easy 10
Member since Feb 2007
1349 posts
Posted on 9/29/20 at 10:19 pm to
Well then maybe we could keep the #8 pick, but I would have to guess OKC would other suitors who could offer more to us if they are desperate to win.

This is unrealistic anyway, because teams will be dealing with less cap space next year. I’m not sure Gayle would accept us being a tax team if we aren’t able to compete.

Also, how does the cap hold affect what we can do when the draft is before free agency? If we are making this trade before the moratorium then wouldn’t we be able to see what teams offer Ingram and then match and offer him a max?....
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram