- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Win Now Doc Rivers Trade Thread
Posted on 9/29/20 at 6:52 pm to Baron
Posted on 9/29/20 at 6:52 pm to Baron
We would make it work. He is not a conventional PF. He is one of the best stretch bigs in the league and what everyone says we need. He is a tough, gritty defender and has thrived on multiple teams. Including spearheading 2 surprise playoff runs out in nowhere the past two seasons. But I love Zion at Center. In our "death line up", isn't that where he would play?
Posted on 9/29/20 at 6:56 pm to brmark70816
Your deal gives up way too much on our end for a Sign and Trade of a 32 year old player.
Posted on 9/29/20 at 7:13 pm to Fun Bunch
Every list I have saw has Gallinari as a top 5 FA. The big two, Ingram and Davis, likely aren't going anywhere. That leaves guys like Van Fleet, Derozan, Harrell.. Gallinari is the best fit for us. But he is going to get offered big money.
Supposedly he wants to go to a good team. I saw a deal where the Lakers were going to go big after him in a S$T. But they really don't have pieces that OKC want. There could be multiple suitors and a bidding war.
Would there be an advantage to doing the trade before FA starts? Is that possible? What kind of package would get it done?
I guess its not a sexy name. But wouldn't he make us much better?
Supposedly he wants to go to a good team. I saw a deal where the Lakers were going to go big after him in a S$T. But they really don't have pieces that OKC want. There could be multiple suitors and a bidding war.
Would there be an advantage to doing the trade before FA starts? Is that possible? What kind of package would get it done?
I guess its not a sexy name. But wouldn't he make us much better?
Posted on 9/29/20 at 7:27 pm to brmark70816
Because this year’s FA crop is hot garbage. 2021 is much better.
Most teams are going to go for short term deals or be frugal at best.
There’s literally no chance that Gal gets 100 million. And sign and trades outside of Paul George scenarios rarely ever get that much.
Maybe a bottom feeder team will offer him something big but 100 seems very unlikely.
Most teams are going to go for short term deals or be frugal at best.
There’s literally no chance that Gal gets 100 million. And sign and trades outside of Paul George scenarios rarely ever get that much.
Maybe a bottom feeder team will offer him something big but 100 seems very unlikely.
Posted on 9/29/20 at 7:38 pm to brmark70816
quote:
But I love Zion at Center. In our "death line up", isn't that where he would play?
Theoretically in the future, sure. But two major problems in the present:
1. Our “death line up” with Zion at the 5 last year couldn’t stop a nose bleed, and I don’t see that changing by next year
2. “death line ups”, similar to what GSW had, worked because the lengthy, versatile wing defenders they had at the 2-4 positions. Not only is Zion not Green on the defensive side next year, but Gallo, Ingram, and Jrue aren’t exactly Iggy, Durant, and Klay either.
When people say that the perfect fit next to Zion is a stretch big, that’s only on one side of the court. So far, Zion has shown he needs someone who can protect the rim on the other side of the floor. Now, hopefully that changes and Zion reaches his full potential and becomes Draymond in a small ball lineup, but that ain’t happening next year or probably for a few years.
Posted on 9/29/20 at 7:39 pm to Fun Bunch
Ok. Got it.. So we don't want him at all? Even a 2/48 with an option on the 2nd season?
Posted on 9/29/20 at 7:43 pm to brmark70816
I’d love to have Gall.
I’m not trading all that for him though.
I’m not trading all that for him though.
Posted on 9/29/20 at 7:51 pm to brmark70816
No, you don't pay a guy that you know would be coming off the bench 20+ million a year.
Posted on 9/29/20 at 8:10 pm to Soggymoss
LINK
Piggybacking off the Lonzo trade idea with the Knicks....
Knicks receive Lonzo and swap #8 for our #13, and they send out Wayne Ellington and the Dallas 2021 1st
Thunder send Chris Paul to the Pels, and receive NAW, Miller, #8, Dallas 2021 1st, Cleveland 2021 2nd, Cleveland 2022 2nd
Pels get Chris Paul and Ellington while still keeping future picks.
This would of course be considering we get Doc here. Knicks might not do this, but they could try to take on Wiggins and trade up to get #2 and reunite the Ball brothers.
Piggybacking off the Lonzo trade idea with the Knicks....
Knicks receive Lonzo and swap #8 for our #13, and they send out Wayne Ellington and the Dallas 2021 1st
Thunder send Chris Paul to the Pels, and receive NAW, Miller, #8, Dallas 2021 1st, Cleveland 2021 2nd, Cleveland 2022 2nd
Pels get Chris Paul and Ellington while still keeping future picks.
This would of course be considering we get Doc here. Knicks might not do this, but they could try to take on Wiggins and trade up to get #2 and reunite the Ball brothers.
Posted on 9/29/20 at 8:32 pm to TechTiger
Good God no, that is an extreme overpay. I wouldn't send any draft picks at all in that deal to OKC.
Not to mention, the salaries don't line up, we don't have 20+ million in cap space to make it happen.
Not to mention, the salaries don't line up, we don't have 20+ million in cap space to make it happen.
Posted on 9/29/20 at 8:48 pm to Soggymoss
No we end up being a tax team, and we would have to make the deal before signing Ingram to his max. The money works but only before singing Ingram.
Are we really giving up that much though? OKC will get offers just as good from other teams desperate to win. Again this is with Doc coaching us, and we are win now.
We give up a first and NAW, and 2 future second round picks which who cares....and keep all our future assets.
Are we really giving up that much though? OKC will get offers just as good from other teams desperate to win. Again this is with Doc coaching us, and we are win now.
We give up a first and NAW, and 2 future second round picks which who cares....and keep all our future assets.
Posted on 9/29/20 at 9:05 pm to TechTiger
You're giving up Ball, NAW and 3 1sts (#13, then #8, and the future 1st)
And that's not how it works, Ingram's cap hold is around 21 million. AT most if we renounce everyone but Ingram, we will have about 7-9 million in cap space.
You would still need to cut another 7 million or so from that deal, which would mean sending out JJ.
And that's not how it works, Ingram's cap hold is around 21 million. AT most if we renounce everyone but Ingram, we will have about 7-9 million in cap space.
You would still need to cut another 7 million or so from that deal, which would mean sending out JJ.
This post was edited on 9/29/20 at 9:06 pm
Posted on 9/29/20 at 9:08 pm to Soggymoss
Ingram’s current cap hold for his qualifying offer is 9.5 million.
I put the link in the post, so the money works. We are giving up a first, NAW, and Lonzo for Paul essentially.....
I put the link in the post, so the money works. We are giving up a first, NAW, and Lonzo for Paul essentially.....
Posted on 9/29/20 at 9:09 pm to LSU Fan 90812
Objectively he’s not terrible. He’s got a better win percentage than any coach we’ve ever had.
He’s just not a great coach, as some try to portray him as. He’s a good one.
He’s in my opinion the guy before the guy.
But regardless, I think he goes to Philly or Houston.
He’s just not a great coach, as some try to portray him as. He’s a good one.
He’s in my opinion the guy before the guy.
But regardless, I think he goes to Philly or Houston.
Posted on 9/29/20 at 9:23 pm to TechTiger
It's 21.6 million.
His qualifying offer is 9.5 million (not a chance we sign him to that), the cap hold is 300% of his current salary.
A future first, NAW, Lonzo (equivalent of #8) and #13.
That is WAYYYYY to much
His qualifying offer is 9.5 million (not a chance we sign him to that), the cap hold is 300% of his current salary.
A future first, NAW, Lonzo (equivalent of #8) and #13.
That is WAYYYYY to much
This post was edited on 9/29/20 at 9:26 pm
Posted on 9/29/20 at 10:08 pm to Soggymoss
Well I’m not sure why it works on the trade machine then....
But if you know you are already moving on from Lonzo, and you are using the future draft capital form that trade along with the first this year(which is undervalued) and NAW. I really don’t think that’s too much of a reach.
I’d rather not give up that much for Paul either, but if you really think we could make that happen for less then that would be great.
But if you know you are already moving on from Lonzo, and you are using the future draft capital form that trade along with the first this year(which is undervalued) and NAW. I really don’t think that’s too much of a reach.
I’d rather not give up that much for Paul either, but if you really think we could make that happen for less then that would be great.
Posted on 9/29/20 at 10:13 pm to TechTiger
Because they are basing it off his Qualifying Offer, which is basically just a 1 year 9.5 deal (which we would never insult him by offering)
If you really are moving on from Lonzo, you send out Lonzo to NYK for #8 and a future 1st (no need to give them #13)
You don't send out all that and gut your young talent and draft picks for a 35 year old point guard who's had a lengthy injury history. I'd love CP3 here, but the cost outweighs the benefit with him, unless we are getting him for basically a salary match, which even then our only players that we can send out salary wise to match would be too much.
If you really are moving on from Lonzo, you send out Lonzo to NYK for #8 and a future 1st (no need to give them #13)
You don't send out all that and gut your young talent and draft picks for a 35 year old point guard who's had a lengthy injury history. I'd love CP3 here, but the cost outweighs the benefit with him, unless we are getting him for basically a salary match, which even then our only players that we can send out salary wise to match would be too much.
This post was edited on 9/29/20 at 10:15 pm
Posted on 9/29/20 at 10:18 pm to TechTiger
Someone will have to give up a good bit to get CP and it really isn't worth it at 40 million when we have more flexibility elsewhere.
Gallinari is a FA. I'm not sure what contract he is looking for but I sure as hell would take him for 20mil or less. Having Gallo, Hart, BI, and Jrue together when they can all stretch the floor and play different positions would be great.
Gallinari is a FA. I'm not sure what contract he is looking for but I sure as hell would take him for 20mil or less. Having Gallo, Hart, BI, and Jrue together when they can all stretch the floor and play different positions would be great.
Posted on 9/29/20 at 10:19 pm to Soggymoss
Well then maybe we could keep the #8 pick, but I would have to guess OKC would other suitors who could offer more to us if they are desperate to win.
This is unrealistic anyway, because teams will be dealing with less cap space next year. I’m not sure Gayle would accept us being a tax team if we aren’t able to compete.
Also, how does the cap hold affect what we can do when the draft is before free agency? If we are making this trade before the moratorium then wouldn’t we be able to see what teams offer Ingram and then match and offer him a max?....
This is unrealistic anyway, because teams will be dealing with less cap space next year. I’m not sure Gayle would accept us being a tax team if we aren’t able to compete.
Also, how does the cap hold affect what we can do when the draft is before free agency? If we are making this trade before the moratorium then wouldn’t we be able to see what teams offer Ingram and then match and offer him a max?....
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News