Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Ryan Anderson sign and trade

Posted on 4/21/16 at 11:49 pm
Posted by TerranceBrody
Kentwood, LA
Member since Apr 2016
139 posts
Posted on 4/21/16 at 11:49 pm
Thinking we should do a sign and trade with Warriors. Anderson for Speights and Festus. Anybody disagree?
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
70700 posts
Posted on 4/22/16 at 12:13 am to
quote:

Anybody disagree?


The Warriors
Posted by NOLA Bronco
Member since Dec 2014
1898 posts
Posted on 4/22/16 at 12:47 am to
Sign and Trade is a huge longshot.

Personally i put the chances at less then 10%
Posted by Macintosh504
Leveraging Salaries University
Member since Sep 2011
52515 posts
Posted on 4/22/16 at 2:09 am to
They don't need offense.
Posted by LSU Fan 90812
A man more eviler than Skeletor.
Member since Feb 2005
50655 posts
Posted on 4/22/16 at 5:36 am to
right we sign and trade for a past his prime player who plays the same position as our best player (therefore relegated to the bench) and another non-shooting, non offensive threat center who plays the same position as two of our other biggest payroll mistakes.

golden state, a team built around a blitzing defense that can switch anything with their bigs, takes on a 4 who can't switch on to anyone while removing bogut's two big minute backups against teams that play big. oh yeah, the thing the 4 does well offensively also replicates the Warrirs record setting strength.

sounds like a good trade for all!
Posted by CP3forMVP
Member since Nov 2010
14853 posts
Posted on 4/22/16 at 5:52 am to
Why would any team do a sign and trade when 99% of the league will have the cap to sign him outright?
Posted by LSU Fan 90812
A man more eviler than Skeletor.
Member since Feb 2005
50655 posts
Posted on 4/22/16 at 7:52 am to
clearly because of the above mentioned reasons. depth defense versitality and continuity probably not important to a soon to be two time champ
Posted by ShoeBang
Member since May 2012
19341 posts
Posted on 4/22/16 at 8:51 am to
quote:

Thinking we should do a sign and trade with Warriors. Anderson for Speights and Festus. Anybody disagree?


Totally agree. While we are at it, make it a three way where we send Jrue & Gordon to OKC for Westbrook and Durant.

Problems solved. Sure hope Demps reads TD
Posted by TerranceBrody
Kentwood, LA
Member since Apr 2016
139 posts
Posted on 4/22/16 at 9:35 am to
Judging from the smartass answers, nobody agrees lol. I guess we'll just let Anderson walk for nothing.
This post was edited on 4/22/16 at 9:35 am
Posted by gmoney504
Member since Apr 2016
384 posts
Posted on 4/22/16 at 9:39 am to
quote:

Judging from the smartass answers, nobody agrees lol. I guess we'll just let Anderson walk for nothing.


The time to trade him was before the deadline. The clowns working in the front office thought we still had a chance at the playoffs and wanted to keep their jobs.
Posted by hugo_boss
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2012
990 posts
Posted on 4/22/16 at 9:44 am to
We don't have much of an option. Like someone above mentioned, most teams will probably be able to sign him outright so why give the pels anything? That's why I wanted to trade him for anything but a long term bad contract. Beats nothing.
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34235 posts
Posted on 4/22/16 at 9:46 am to
quote:

Judging from the smartass answers, nobody agrees lol. I guess we'll just let Anderson walk for nothing.



1. Your proposed trade arguably makes both teams worse, so neither has incentive to complete it.

2. Your proposed trade isn't the only possible scenario for a sign-and-trade.

3. A sign-and-trade is unlikely with the expanded cap.
Posted by ShoeBang
Member since May 2012
19341 posts
Posted on 4/22/16 at 11:04 am to
I also heard that Doc Brown is in New Orleans with the Delorean to go back to 1992 and get Michael Jordan to warp to today and play for the Pels.

Might destroy space and time, might not. Worth the risk IMO.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61435 posts
Posted on 4/22/16 at 11:14 am to
quote:

3. A sign-and-trade is unlikely with the expanded cap.


Teams that may want Anderson in a starting capacity.

Sacramento
Indiana
Toronto
Boston

Teams that may want Anderson in a starting capacity and likely won't have the cap space to sign him.

Toronto

Teams that may want Anderson in a starting capacity and may have contracts they'd want to move in a S&T

Toronto (Ross?)
Sacramento (Gay)

I think the 2 teams above are the primary S&T options, and at best you'd get future 2nds out of the deal. Trades could shake things up, or maybe Indy can sign say Mike Conley and then would want to trade Hill and/or Stuckey for Ryno, but the odds are fairly low we get anything more significant than cap space in return for Anderson.
Posted by Overbrook
Member since May 2013
6075 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 7:56 am to
Demps couldn't dump his expiring at the deadline. Now we are to believe that he can properly execute a sign and trade?
This post was edited on 4/25/16 at 7:57 am
Posted by gsmith5651
Member since Feb 2016
190 posts
Posted on 4/26/16 at 8:52 pm to
Sadly, we probly missed our chance to get anything out of Anderson. Another reason to boot Dell
Posted by sma19
New Orleans
Member since Dec 2011
335 posts
Posted on 4/26/16 at 11:01 pm to
Do you think we could get Mclemore in a S&T from Sac?
Posted by ConnorJB34
Member since Mar 2016
33 posts
Posted on 4/28/16 at 1:23 pm to
don't need offense.. da fuq? anthony davis is the only one that we can go to to get a clutch bucket.. and gordon and anderson but not rlly. we've had breakout games on offense but not many whatsoever. most of them were cuz of AD going off. and we have frickin Ashit and perkins at C bruh they cant do shite on offense. cunninghams inconsistent, evans takes questionable shots, and if we have Q-PON next year thats not helping either hes there for defense
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61435 posts
Posted on 4/28/16 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

Do you think we could get Mclemore in a S&T from Sac?


The only reason they do a S&T of Ryno for McLemore is if they just want him off their roster and no other team wants McLemore, which I would find hard to believe nobody would want him for free, or they attach another player they don't want with him, like Gay + McLemore for Ryno.
This post was edited on 4/28/16 at 1:30 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram