Started By
Message

re: Random Playoff Observations Thread

Posted on 6/6/21 at 9:31 am to
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 6/6/21 at 9:31 am to
quote:

Also I’m not down with sacrificing the war chest to get good or really good. The war chest should be to get the last all star level player to put next to Zion and BI when they are both top 15 players instead of 35 to 50


Danny ainge.

come by my place for some bass fishing.

getting good (.500 or better) lets zion enjoy playin or really good lets zion enjoy playoffs.
I feel its critical to make the tournament 2022.
This post was edited on 6/6/21 at 9:44 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422689 posts
Posted on 6/6/21 at 10:05 am to
quote:

CJ is not a big enough difference maker to unload the warchest for IMO.


what will CJ go for? i can't imagine he's worth more than maybe 2, 1sts. i don't think we would have to "unload the war chest" for him
Posted by lgtiger
LA
Member since May 2005
1141 posts
Posted on 6/6/21 at 10:13 am to
I thought CP3 was a free agent ? Do they have an option on him ? Pardon my ignorance
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 6/6/21 at 10:14 am to
Empty it, no, but he would take meaningful assets to acquire considering if he gets moved, Portland is only going to do it for something that they can get back to put around Lillard in the hopes that it will calm him down and not turn into a disgruntled player.

Posted by PrayingMantis
Member since Jul 2013
1144 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 2:09 am to
I wouldn’t use 1 1st. An asset is t just how good a player is it’s how good are they for the money. Imo he is overpayed. He is getting over 30m per and never made an all star game and never will. He is also nearly 30 so he isn’t on our timeline. Unless we gave them Bledsoe I’m not giving a positive asset to get him
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422689 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 7:18 am to
oh I'm not pushing for CJ just saying he wouldn't be THAT expensive (to use the term "unload the war chest")

Dame probably would be, but he turns 31 next month
Posted by Toula
504
Member since Dec 2006
35399 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 9:31 am to
I think this board is so focused on the home run moves, or landing the big names. I think we'd see full-blown meltdown if we had an offseason like the Hawks last year.

Gallinari - 3/$61M
Rondo - 2/$15M
Bogdanovich - 4/$72M
Solomon Hill- 1/$2M


One could say their trade of Capela is similar to ours for Adams.

And here they are 1 up in the EC semis
This post was edited on 6/7/21 at 9:32 am
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
8856 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 11:24 am to
quote:

Bogdanovich - 4/$72M


We really should have explored trying to get him and shipping off JJ and/or Ball last off season.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25633 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 11:36 am to
after watching Bogdanvich in the bubble against us, i didn't think much of him b/c of how terrible he was on defense, despite him having a great offensive game. Lonzo was actually driving by him for layups, which is somethign we never see.

He looks awesome in Atlanta. He oozes confidence. I thought that contract was going to be a killer to Atlanta, but it's without a doubt working out.
Posted by J_Hingle
LA
Member since Jun 2013
5108 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 11:48 am to
quote:

I think this board is so focused on the home run moves, or landing the big names. I think we'd see full-blown meltdown if we had an offseason like the Hawks last year.

Gallinari - 3/$61M
Rondo - 2/$15M
Bogdanovich - 4/$72M
Solomon Hill- 1/$2M


One could say their trade of Capela is similar to ours for Adams.

And here they are 1 up in the EC semis


If they can dump bledsoe and trade Lonzo, I am absolutely fine with signing guys that can just shoot and aren't complete dumbasses. This team needs shooters and high IQ players.
Posted by duyp
Member since May 2011
2695 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

high IQ players.


Wonder how much Conley, Lowry or Rose will cost since all of them are FAs. Any of them will help out our team a lot, no matter how old they are.

Edit: Rose, Olynyk and McDermott aren’t splashy players but will be a great off season for us.
This post was edited on 6/7/21 at 12:55 pm
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61520 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 5:49 pm to
Speaking of high IQ players, I know this board loves to laugh at Kendrick Perkins. You have to watch this clip from The Jump starting at the 3:45 mark. After Richard Jefferson and Zach Lowe get finished talking about how the nice words from Carlisle on Porzingis were really a back handed compliment and he's not good enough to be the #2 player, Perk steps in with a different take and the facial expressions of bewilderment while Perk goes off are hilarious.

LINK

Also, I know Porzingis' name has started to be included in the list of trade targets because you could get him cheap. Zach and RJ's take that he'd work better for Dallas if he could play center but they can't do that because he's too fragile is exactly why he wouldn't work here.
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
27256 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 6:04 pm to
Yeah, Porzingis is super overrated.

All he does is stand at the 3 point line.

I don't even think he is a 3 on a contender.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110924 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 6:07 pm to
Do not want Porzingas. We don't need negative value max contracts than then can potentially take us out of the running for an actual legit max level guy.
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
17879 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 6:25 pm to


quote:

Porzingis' name has started to be included in the list of trade targets because you could get him cheap


Dallas would absolutely have to attach picks to get off his contract. Nobody wants to pay $101.5 million over the next three years for a pick-and-pop shooter who couldn't even shoot 30% from 3 this season.

And, yeah, we don't want him 'cuz he's soft. We need tougher players, and Porzingis is the opposite of that.
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
17879 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 6:32 pm to
I mean, if Dallas offered Porzingis straight-up in exchange for Bledsoe and Adams, I guess I'd think about it. Our bad contracts for your bad contract? Maybe.
Posted by SaintTigerPel
LaPlace
Member since Dec 2017
915 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 7:26 pm to
I agree, but our D would actually get significantly worse with that deal. And I’m as low on Bled as anyone, but Porzingas is just atrocious on defense.
Posted by 3PieceSpicy
Metairie
Member since Jan 2021
6255 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 7:29 pm to
I guess the only reason why you wouldn’t do that is if you couldnt use their contracts to aggregate salary for someone better. I would also throw in a first and a second or two in that deal. People have really begun to underrate Porzingis. I think people forget the night he dropped 40 on Adams head just a few months ago. If you watch Dallas, Luka controls the ball 99% of the game, so Porz’s offensive game has been really minimized and marginalized and that is why he hates it there.

Porz is a good player and if the only thing we did this offseason was trade Adams, Bled, 10, and a second to Dallas for Porz and a future first, as well as run it back with Zo and Hart, I think our team would be tremendously improved. Getting rid of Bled and Adams are additions by subtraction and Porz is a guy who can drop 30 any given night, space the floor and protect the rim (Just 1-2 years ago I remember several 5 plus block Porz games. Sure his defense isn’t great, but he’s better than Adams at this point, especially when Porz gets further removed from his meniscus surgery.
This post was edited on 6/7/21 at 7:30 pm
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
21077 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

I mean, if Dallas offered Porzingis straight-up in exchange for Bledsoe and Adams, I guess I'd think about it. Our bad contracts for your bad contract? Maybe.


After what Griffin said that's a burning down SKC level type of trade.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110924 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 8:18 pm to
quote:

If you watch Dallas, Luka controls the ball 99% of the game, so Porz’s offensive game has been really minimized and marginalized and that is why he hates it there
Well, that's what we should do with Zion, so not sure how it would be beneficial for him to be in New Orleans.
Jump to page
Page First 10 11 12 13 14 ... 23
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 23Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram