- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ESPN: Pels just a player away from upper elechon Super Team
Posted on 7/5/17 at 1:01 pm to Number 31
Posted on 7/5/17 at 1:01 pm to Number 31
Cousins and Davis are both Centers, but Davis will always be listed as a PF. So, you'd have to compare Griffin to Davis (Davis has a slight edge there). Then you'd compare Cousins to Jordan, where Cousins would be slightly ahead (offense Cousins, defense Jordan).
My point is everybody keeps saying the Pelicans have this radical alignmemt playing these two together. But lots of teams have had top 5 or so PFs and Cs together. So I'm curious why the Pelicans pair would be so much more special. I'm not trying to tear them down, just trying to understand why they would be unique..
My point is everybody keeps saying the Pelicans have this radical alignmemt playing these two together. But lots of teams have had top 5 or so PFs and Cs together. So I'm curious why the Pelicans pair would be so much more special. I'm not trying to tear them down, just trying to understand why they would be unique..
Posted on 7/5/17 at 1:03 pm to brmark70816
Because both can space the floor unlike any other big duo this league has ever seen. Do you see DeAndre Jordan shooting from more than 5-10ft? Do you see Dwight doing that?
They are a matchup nightmare, but they need shooters around them to really accentuate their talents.
They are a matchup nightmare, but they need shooters around them to really accentuate their talents.
Posted on 7/5/17 at 1:06 pm to brmark70816
Davis slight edge? You're really slipping there
Posted on 7/5/17 at 1:12 pm to brmark70816
quote:
lots of teams have had top 5 or so PFs and Cs together
There are 2 that would meet this qualification, the Pels and Clippers. I guess Jokic and Millsap in Denver might qualify depending on how highly you rate Millsap.
quote:
this radical alignmemt playing these two together.
The staggering is going to be real. The Clippers and Nuggets may have 2 top 5 PF/Cs, but they are not interchangeable like AD/DC are. Millsap and Blake are not going to anchor your defense when Jokic and Jordan are out. Jordan is not going to lead the offense when Blake is out. I really think staggering is going to be a nice advantage for the Pels. No more bench units giving up leads but hopefully adding on to the lead.
Posted on 7/5/17 at 1:29 pm to JayJay2
Griffin is way undervalued. He is a top 3 PF and a top 10 player in the league. He was injured last year, but nobody believes he's not going to be the same player. I'll concede Davis is the superior talent, but Griffin is the more complete player. Either or, Davis isn't light years better. I just don't know where that would come from..
I was talking about pairings through the years. But even now, Gobert and Favors, Aldridge and Gasol (probably too old now), the pair in Orlando (Gordon had a monster year), you already mentioned the guys in Denver..
I was talking about pairings through the years. But even now, Gobert and Favors, Aldridge and Gasol (probably too old now), the pair in Orlando (Gordon had a monster year), you already mentioned the guys in Denver..
Posted on 7/5/17 at 1:42 pm to brmark70816
quote:
I was talking about pairings through the years. But even now, Gobert and Favors, Aldridge and Gasol (probably too old now), the pair in Orlando (Gordon had a monster year), you already mentioned the guys in Denver..
And which historical pairings had 2 bigs that are both skilled and big enough to be interchangeable? This hasn't been seen in the league since The Admiral and Tim Duncan and having both bigs in their primes is something that the league probably hasn't seen since the black and white TV days when there were like 8 teams.
This post was edited on 7/5/17 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 7/5/17 at 1:48 pm to TigerinATL
You can't really talk sense into someone that is so far off in his analysis like this guy is
Posted on 7/5/17 at 2:14 pm to brmark70816
quote:
Griffin is way undervalued. He is a top 3 PF and a top 10 player in the league.
He's nowhere near top 10. That is laughable
Posted on 7/5/17 at 2:24 pm to CocoLoco
lebron
KD
Steph
Kawhi
Goatbrook
Harden
AD
7 undeniables in top 10.
3 left are pretty debatable... none of which i think includes griffin. Kyrie, KAT, and Lillard make 3 alone.
KD
Steph
Kawhi
Goatbrook
Harden
AD
7 undeniables in top 10.
3 left are pretty debatable... none of which i think includes griffin. Kyrie, KAT, and Lillard make 3 alone.
Posted on 7/5/17 at 2:25 pm to CocoLoco
quote:
Griffin is way undervalued. He is a top 3 PF and a top 10 athlete in the league.
This is probably more accurate IMO.
Posted on 7/5/17 at 2:31 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
lebron
KD
Steph
Kawhi
Goatbrook
Harden
AD
7 undeniables in top 10.
This is correct
quote:
3 left are pretty debatable... none of which i think includes griffin. Kyrie, KAT, and Lillard make 3 alone.
KAT
Lillard
Irving
Antetokounmpo
DeRozan
George
Butler
Wall
Cousins
After those is when you can start to debate.
This post was edited on 7/5/17 at 2:32 pm
Posted on 7/5/17 at 2:42 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
lebron
KD
Steph
Kawhi
Goatbrook
Harden
AD
CP3, Greek Freak, John Wall, Boogie, Paul George, KAT, Hayward , Butler I'd take before Griffin.
Lowry, Lillard, Green, Klay, Irving, Derozan, Griffin, Porzingis, Melo, Love, Jokic, Marc Gasol, I. Thomas ... all kinda in the same tier.
Might be a bit early to put Porzingis and Jokic in that tier, but I think they are in that mix. I am fine with someone not having them in there, though,
Posted on 7/5/17 at 2:45 pm to Mystery
Chris Paul and Klay Thompson should be ahead of Griffin as well. Top 10 is very laughable.
Posted on 7/5/17 at 2:47 pm to brmark70816
quote:
Griffin is way undervalued. He is a top 3 PF and a top 10 player in the league.
Keep em coming brother
Posted on 7/5/17 at 2:49 pm to Mystery
quote:
KAT
Lillard
Irving
Antetokounmpo
DeRozan
George
Butler
Wall
Cousins
Before Griffin?
KAT - just as bad defensively, but offensively he spaces a lot better and doesn't need the ball often to be as effective.
Lillard - one of the best combo guards in the league, can shoot better than anyone not named curry. defensively, poor
Irving - same as above
Giannis - one of the new up and comers. Dude is lanky AF, can defend very well, can finish at the rim, can make defenses pay, can run the point, can rebound. he can do everything except shoot.
DeRozan - dude can attack the rim with the best of them. run the offense through him and things can happen. he's also a decent defender but rarely gets credit for it.
George and Butler - Amazing SFs arguably top 5 at their position. they can do it all. arguably the most complete SFs of this list.
Wall - top 3 PG, defends well, runs the point well, shoots well, finishes well.
Cousins - top 3 center, offensively he can do EVERYTHING from under the rim to the 3pt line. He can also pass the ball as a secondary handler. Defensively his effort dwindles when he gets railed by the officials, but offensively he's just someone who straight dominates even if he doesn't need to hold onto the ball.
This post was edited on 7/5/17 at 2:54 pm
Posted on 7/5/17 at 3:01 pm to Covingtontiger77
Well yeah if they get bob cousy at the point, or maravich, or luscious allen, great pgs through the ages.
Posted on 7/5/17 at 4:02 pm to htran90
So Griffin is behind Cousins? Lets compare, they have both been in the league 7 seasons..
Cousins-
2x all nba, 3x all star, never been on a winning team or been to the playoffs
Career avgs- 21/10/3/1 on 46% shooting
Griffin-
ROTY, 4x all nba, 5x all star, 6 straight winning seasons and playoff appearances
Career avgs- 21/9/4 on 51% shooting
Now please tell me again how Cousins is the better player..
Cousins-
2x all nba, 3x all star, never been on a winning team or been to the playoffs
Career avgs- 21/10/3/1 on 46% shooting
Griffin-
ROTY, 4x all nba, 5x all star, 6 straight winning seasons and playoff appearances
Career avgs- 21/9/4 on 51% shooting
Now please tell me again how Cousins is the better player..
Posted on 7/5/17 at 4:07 pm to brmark70816
I don't follow Griffin much but I do know he's injured a lot and Zach Lowe seems to think we've already seen peak Griffin and his best days are behind him. He wasn't implying Griffin was about to fall off a cliff, but he doesn't think he'll ever be in the MVP conversation again like he was in 2014.
Posted on 7/5/17 at 4:20 pm to brmark70816
quote:
So Griffin is behind Cousins? Lets compare, they have both been in the league 7 seasons..
Cousins-
2x all nba, 3x all star, never been on a winning team or been to the playoffs
Career avgs- 21/10/3/1 on 46% shooting
Griffin-
ROTY, 4x all nba, 5x all star, 6 straight winning seasons and playoff appearances
Career avgs- 21/9/4 on 51% shooting
Now please tell me again how Cousins is the better player..
Being on a winning team gives you more 'accolades' over deserving players, even if you're the 2nd or 3rd fiddle on a stellar team. Griffin was a top 5 player, MVP candidate but that was 3-4 years ago.
Cousins never had a top 5 player or top 5 guard in the league on his team at the same time, Griffin had CP3 for all 6 playoff appearances and never won less than 50 games (Not including the shortened year). People think New Orleans has been mismanaged, but compared to Sacramento we look competent.
Over 60% of Griffin's shots are assisted and of his shots, 14% are dunks, that's quality point guard play.
Cousins on the other hand doesn't even break 50% and only 7% are dunks, that shows you poor point guard play and why he had to continue to expand his game to be an even bigger ball handler.
Griffin's starting PGs: Davis/Williams and Paul
Cousins' starting PGs: Evans, Thomas, Collison, Rondo, and Lawson
Also please keep going off career accolades and stats..the biggest thing about Griffin is how he's failed to improve his game or stayed stagnant the last few years, Cousins on the other hand has been improving.
3-4 years ago, I'd easily say Griffin > Cousins. But this isn't then, its today and today Cousins is a 27/11/4 player who can shoot and space outside while being a solid ball handler. Griffin on the other hand is an a 22/8/5 PF who is also a solid ball handler, but is considered injury prone and hasn't finished a full playoff series in over 2 years.
This post was edited on 7/5/17 at 4:21 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News