Started By
Message

re: David Griffin loves Brandon Ingram; 'several' within Pelicans loved Lakers' original offer

Posted on 6/6/19 at 9:31 am to
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
178994 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 9:31 am to
quote:

I'm just weary of all this, weary of trade talk. I'll still talk about it, but I and others keep talking like we know what we are talking about or we have a crystal ball.

The truth is GMs all of the time prove that they value completely different things than fans and know significantly more. The PG/Oladipo trade was laughed at by fans.

So while I'm still going to actively participate in discussions and have my own opinions, the truth is I don't know shite, nor does anyone else here. So no matter what the trade is I'll just see how it goes.

I just want it all to be over with.



sooooooooooo...................


you love the ATL deal or what?




son of a bitch, someone give bunchie a hug n tug.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130268 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 9:34 am to
I woke up at 4am thinking about work and couldn't get back to sleep so I'm fricking tired already at 9:30.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130268 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 9:35 am to
I'm not sure how I feel about ATL. First I don't feel like they will go for it as I think their expectation of re-signing AD has to be low.

Second with those picks I'm just not sure it beats some other offers. If a lot of other teams lowball us then maybe.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
30345 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 9:36 am to
quote:

So with this lakers trade our core after next season will be:

Lonzo
Jrue
Ingram (Maxed out)
Zion


A lakers trade from me would never include getting Lonzo.

quote:

with the #4 pick who will likely be no better than a role player (which isn't necessarily a bad thing but that's the reality)


Here's some history of what each picks chances are of becoming a star/role player are. It was compiled from 1989 to 2008 drafts, so its a bit dated. This one is a more recent, and shows the % chance of getting an allstar from picks 1-8, from 1980 to 2015. I'll post the data since it's a slide show.
1 - 77%
2 - 34%
3 - 49%
4 - 29%
5 - 31%
6 - 20%
7 - 20%
8 - 11%
When i said 10%, that was just me looking at picks 4-7 for the last 10 years. When i say star, i mean Steph Curry Damian Lillard superstar. there were plenty of other good players in there. I'ts not like it was 10% superstar or bust.


I don't get the concern with having to pay someone. Are you guys under some impression that we can have some rookie contracts and have cap space and sign some big FA? I could care less about the salary cap going forward. We will always be a team that needs to acquire talent thorugh the draft and trade, no FA, so what's the big deal in having to pay Ingram a year sooner than Tatum?
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
104037 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 9:39 am to
Paying Tatum isn’t a problem to me.

Paying Ingram within 1 season IS, mainly because that isn’t much time to figure out if he fits and if his health will hold up.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
30345 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 9:39 am to
quote:

The truth is GMs all of the time prove that they value completely different things than fans and know significantly more. The PG/Oladipo trade was laughed at by fans.

So while I'm still going to actively participate in discussions and have my own opinions, the truth is I don't know shite, nor does anyone else here. So no matter what the trade is I'll just see how it goes.

I just want it all to be over with.


Feel the same way. completely agree.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62446 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 9:43 am to
The Pels added 2 of the top GM candidates on the market to the FO this offseason along with the most highly regarded trainer. If there was ever a time for us to sit back and watch and not feel the need to preemptively second guess the team, it's now.
This post was edited on 6/6/19 at 9:44 am
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130268 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 9:44 am to
quote:

If there was ever a time for us to sit back and watch and not feel the need to second guess the team, it's now.




Yup, I do agree...but David Griffin is the one that pushed for Anthony Bennett. So he is very far from infallible and championed one of the biggest NBA busts of all time.

So while we need to trust them, no one is above second guessing or criticism.

But as of now, strictly with the Pelicans, I think they deserve our trust.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
178994 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 9:46 am to
What's all the hate with Reddish about. Reading up on him, looks like he may develop into a nice outside shooter. He seems like the yang to zion's ying. They seem complimentary.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
30345 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Yup, I do agree...but David Griffin is the one that pushed for Anthony Bennett. So he is very far from infallible and championed one of the biggest NBA busts of all time.



I won't forget that, but i will give him the benefit of the doubt b/c that was one of the worst drafts of all time. Any pick he made at #1 was going to be a bust more than likely. There's never been a draft where no one had any idea who the first pick would be. If there isnt' a clear cut favorite, there's at least 2 guys you can confidently say i'd take them #1. There was no #1 pick in that draft, not looking at hindsight for Giannis at 15.

I'm excited for the future of whatever we get, much like the excitement i had to make a 1st round pick when we got Buddy. It's a feeling we haven't had too often, the prospect of making a 1st round draft pick.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130268 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 9:51 am to
He played next to two all world players so he had a ton of open looks and was not particularly good. He shot 35% from the floor, in college. That's really bad. He took a REALLY high volume of 3s (7.4) and made 33%. That's not terrible but the overall FG% for a guy with his size is really shitty.

From what I've read a lot of teams are really low on him. As I said earlier I'm a complete amateur but I watched Duke play a LOT this past year and he looked pretty shitty to me. As with anything, we will see.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13755 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 9:52 am to
quote:

The Pels added 2 of the top GM candidates on the market to the FO this offseason along with the most highly regarded trainer. If there was ever a time for us to sit back and watch and not feel the need to preemptively second guess the team, it's now.


Sadly it seems we are still using the previous regime's scouting group though. Unless there have been hires that have not been reported, it does not appear we will get the analytic group in here until later which means we may not have them for this trade or the draft.
Posted by Crazed2APoint
New Orleans
Member since Mar 2019
88 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 9:53 am to
quote:

On top of all that, while he is defending the Lakers deal, many of his statements about it seem to be couched in "Griffin likes this" language. Maybe this is all misinformation to push the Celtics, but it sounds like Griffin has liked Ingram for a long time so it just might be true.


I have some of the same theories. I had made a post last week talking about how around this time even those with real deal rock solid sources who are normally spot on, are being fed false info OR being told what to put out there for leverage purposes. Because we're not the only people that look to see what people are saying on msg boards. Nba people keep an eye on everything to. Figure out who has legit inside info and keep an eye on them.

And the thing that makes me wonder about what Crews has been saying is that he's a smart guy. Would he really put out 100% real deal info about Griffin's thought process and which way he's leaning at a time when leverage is EVERYTHING in these negotiations? So like I said, maybe he's getting fed false info, or he's being told what to put out there because they know people know Crewz has legit sources. Everything is a poker game right now so it's hard to figure out what's real and what's not.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13755 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 9:54 am to
quote:

He played next to two all world players so he had a ton of open looks and was not particularly good. He shot 35% from the floor, in college. That's really bad. He took a REALLY high volume of 3s (7.4) and made 33%. That's not terrible but the overall FG% for a guy with his size is really shitty.

From what I've read a lot of teams are really low on him. As I said earlier I'm a complete amateur but I watched Duke play a LOT this past year and he looked pretty shitty to me. As with anything, we will see.

I saw that he is having surgery for a core issue that he played with this season. I wonder if this affecting his production.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13755 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 9:56 am to
quote:

I have some of the same theories. I had made a post last week talking about how around this time even those with real deal rock solid sources who are normally spot on, are being fed false info OR being told what to put out there for leverage purposes. Because we're not the only people that look to see what people are saying on msg boards. Nba people keep an eye on everything to. Figure out who has legit inside info and keep an eye on them.

And the thing that makes me wonder about what Crews has been saying is that he's a smart guy. Would he really put out 100% real deal info about Griffin's thought process and which way he's leaning at a time when leverage is EVERYTHING in these negotiations? So like I said, maybe he's getting fed false info, or he's being told what to put out there because they know people know Crewz has legit sources. Everything is a poker game right now so it's hard to figure out what's real and what's not.

Maybe, but in the grand scheme of things, would NBA teams really look to someone like Crewz who continually changes his twitter account in order to stay relatively anonymous? I cannot imagine anyone thinks he can manipulate a GM with his info. My only other thought was whether he was trying to troll Fletcher into saying that his sources tell him ....(whatever deal MM pushes).
Posted by PrayingMantis
Member since Jul 2013
1313 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 9:59 am to
They had no spacing. All 3 Duke players should benefit with NBA spacinh
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
178994 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 10:01 am to
I think Reddish will turn into a very fine nba player. He won't be an alpha on a roster but he'd be a nice complimentary scorer and develop a nice outside game.
Posted by Crazed2APoint
New Orleans
Member since Mar 2019
88 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 10:04 am to
Not saying that they base their whole opinion and stance on something they see out there by some random person on a msg board or Twitter. Just that it can still be a little seed planted if they know the person does clearly have some connections within an organization.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
30345 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 10:06 am to
quote:

I think Reddish will turn into a very fine nba player. He won't be an alpha on a roster but he'd be a nice complimentary scorer and develop a nice outside game.



maybe. But why would we draft someone, assuming we had a pick in the 4-7 range, that has very little chance of ever becoming anything more than a role player?
If we were picking him with the 14th pick, ok then.
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 10:09 am to
quote:

we don't like him we can at least move him on his rookie deal.


You're saying that trading for Ingram is a negative for the Pels because they only have one year of his rookie deal before deciding what to do.

Then you are saying that Tatum is the better target because the Pels can trade him on his rookie deal for the 20/21 season if they don't like him.

By your own logic, that doesn't make any sense. Tatum's contract status at that point would be identical to Ingram's now plus he would be on his 3rd team in 4 years after a disappointing season in NO.

Extra year is nice, but wouldn't be a deciding factor for me at all. The only question: which package/player offers the best chance of building a team around Zion that can be a consistent winner?

Tatum can be the answer. Ingram. Barrett. Whoever, but that has to be target. Not a Dempsian model of "acquire a player as an asset to be moved later"
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram