Started By
Message

re: Bucks are shopping Giannis & Other Trade talk

Posted on 5/12/26 at 1:27 pm to
Posted by longhorn22
Nicholls St. Fan
Member since Jan 2007
43193 posts
Posted on 5/12/26 at 1:27 pm to
no
Posted by ghost2most
Member since Mar 2012
7922 posts
Posted on 5/12/26 at 2:01 pm to
Same shite yall said about Durant. His stats will still be good for a few years but injuries will pile up and you’ll notice that despite the stats his teams don’t really go anywhere.

Said it before. Saying it again. You don’t trade for dudes over 30 with injury histories especially bigs based on athleticism.
This post was edited on 5/12/26 at 2:02 pm
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
11381 posts
Posted on 5/12/26 at 8:59 pm to
To me, the team to watch is the Thunder. They want to keep their window open as long as possible. Which means swapping out guys due big deals, and keep stocking with guys on low/rookie level type contracts. They are loaded with future picks and obscene depth. It's not crazy they might look to move a few of their primary pieces.

The one I am thinking about the most is Cason Wallace. He is due a big extension this summer. With Mitchell busting out, and they still have Topic and McCain. Do they look to move Wallace now? If they are letting Dort go, and we offer Jones/Fears for Wallace/Joe, do they go for that?

I would hate to give up Jones or Fears. But Wallace is 22 and a premier two-way PG with all-star potential (definitely all defense). The price is going to be steep, and we aren't going to out deal OKC.
Posted by SaintTigerPel
LaPlace
Member since Dec 2017
1623 posts
Posted on 5/12/26 at 9:50 pm to
quote:

Do they look to move Wallace now? If they are letting Dort go, and we offer Jones/Fears for Wallace/Joe, do they go for that? I would hate to give up Jones or Fears. But Wallace is 22 and a premier two-way PG with all-star potential (definitely all defense). The price is going to be steep, and we aren't going to out deal OKC.



No way. I understand the team dynamics are different, on account of one being great and the other being horrendous, but no way would I make that trade. Fears is 19 years old and averaged 14/4/3 and Wallace is 22 and averaged 8/3/3 in 1 minute more per game. Fears is also 1 year into his rookie contract and Wallace, like you said, is going to get paid soon.
Posted by SenGooner
Member since Feb 2026
100 posts
Posted on 5/12/26 at 11:36 pm to
I do like Herb, but he doesn't fit in with the roster construction and he's arguably hit his ceiling.

If we are building around Fears and Queen (and Z for a bit), we need more knock down shooters than Trey Murphy. I'd use pick 11 on a guy that can shoot. And we would have him on a rookie deal on same timeline as Fears and Queen.

I'd also be looking to trade for guys like Corey Kispert and G Dick. I know they have been disappointing, but we need to stop building this roster like it's the 1990's. We have a couple guys that create mismatches and are good enough passers for their positions. Now we need some guys that can actually knock down those open shots.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
11381 posts
Posted on 5/13/26 at 5:11 am to
quote:

No way. I understand the team dynamics are different, on account of one being great and the other being horrendous, but no way would I make that trade. Fears is 19 years old and averaged 14/4/3 and Wallace is 22 and averaged 8/3/3 in 1 minute more per game. Fears is also 1 year into his rookie contract and Wallace, like you said, is going to get paid soon.


They are projecting Wallace to get a 4Y/100M deal. This is all how you predict each one going forward. I believe that Wallace can score an efficient 12+ppg, while being an elite level defender combo guard (ala Marcus Smart or Avery Bradley). He would slide into the backcourt along with Murray, since he can play 2-3 positions. So we aren't pressed to try and balance Fears and Murray, or trade Murray to make room for Fears. It just schematically fixes our line up and plugs major holes. Adding Joe is a major bonus. Losing Jones hurts, bit I like Bey taking his spot/minutes.

We need to add players from winning cultures/systems.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112892 posts
Posted on 5/13/26 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

If we trade Herb we might as well trade everyone. When he isn’t on the court, we suck arse even more than we usually do. Herb is not the kind of guy we need less of. We need more guys like Herb, if we care about winning right now.

Herb's year by year On/Off:

2022: +6.3
2023: +3.2
2024: +2.9
2025: +10.5
2026: +4.6


You don't luck into that year after year over the course of 8800 minutes. As you said, when he plays, we're MUCH better than when he doesn't play.

To take it a step further, playing 5 seasons for a shite franchise that has averaged less than 35 wins pers season since Herb arrived, Herb STILL has a positive Net Rating when he's on the court over those 5 years, at +2.4.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112892 posts
Posted on 5/13/26 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

Give up Zion for #11 straight up.

Of course.

We should have cut Zion last season when we had the chance if he truly had zero trade value when we allegedly shopped him but no one wanted him.

Posted by Demps
Member since Oct 2025
1347 posts
Posted on 5/15/26 at 9:00 am to
Posted by Demps
Member since Oct 2025
1347 posts
Posted on 5/15/26 at 9:03 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/15/26 at 9:11 am
Posted by Demps
Member since Oct 2025
1347 posts
Posted on 5/15/26 at 9:10 am to
Posted by ghost2most
Member since Mar 2012
7922 posts
Posted on 5/15/26 at 9:35 am to
I mean, sure they'll listen because why not but it would take a king's ransom to get to 1 in this draft. Like crazy capital.
Posted by Demps
Member since Oct 2025
1347 posts
Posted on 5/15/26 at 9:46 am to
quote:

mean, sure they'll listen because why not but it would take a king's ransom to get to 1 in this draft. Like crazy capital


Hold my beer



Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13756 posts
Posted on 5/15/26 at 10:15 am to
quote:


Multiple reports now

It is not a "multiple report" if the poster is sourcing the same exact report.
Posted by Demps
Member since Oct 2025
1347 posts
Posted on 5/15/26 at 10:37 am to
Posted by Macintosh
Lane State University
Member since Sep 2011
56574 posts
Posted on 5/15/26 at 10:43 am to
Peterson and Bailey is a fun trade for Dybansta. Wizards wanted Bailey in last years draft too.
Posted by Demps
Member since Oct 2025
1347 posts
Posted on 5/15/26 at 10:48 am to
To think we let Bryson Graham walk. If he were to connect on a trade like this


Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13756 posts
Posted on 5/15/26 at 10:53 am to
quote:


To think we let Bryson Graham walk. If he were to connect on a trade like this
So Bleacher Report proposes a fantasy trade and you get excited about it?
Posted by LSUPilot07
Member since Feb 2022
8612 posts
Posted on 5/15/26 at 11:56 am to
11 isn’t enough to get any of our core players. They would need to add more draft assets or a solid role player if not a starter.
Posted by Demps
Member since Oct 2025
1347 posts
Posted on 5/15/26 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

So Bleacher Report proposes a fantasy trade and you get excited about it


I can post more. Its the offseason speculation.. This is a POSITIVE forum.

Have we got our Head Coach yet?

This post was edited on 5/15/26 at 1:11 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram