- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 8/4/21 at 2:48 pm to TigerinATL
quote:
Buddy to the Pels has always been one of those deals that seems like the path of least resistance for both teams with where they want to go.
I’m pretty much hoping for this to happen now. His bad contract kinda offsets Graham’s good one.
Posted on 8/4/21 at 2:49 pm to Not Cooper
quote:
I would like Danny green. Fits a need and he can still play.
No he can't. He's been pretty shitty the last 2 years, especially in the playoffs I'd rather Trey Murphy get whatever minutes Danny Green might get if he was on this team.
the dude is a career 9ppg player. Sure lets throw the plays older than his actual old age player $10M/yr.
Posted on 8/4/21 at 2:49 pm to shel311
quote:
The deal is not yet complete, though, because the Wizards do not have the cap space to sign Dinwiddie outright. They must come to a sign-and-trade agreement with Brooklyn, and that strategy comes with complications.
The Nets are far above the luxury tax entering next season thanks to their three superstars: Kevin Durant, Kyrie Irving and James Harden. Throw in big contracts for Joe Harris and DeAndre Jordan that are also on the books and the Nets might wind up being the most expensive team in basketball next season. A Dinwiddie sign-and-trade, without a third team, might assure that. The Nets would have to take back 80 percent of Dinwiddie's outgoing salary to make a trade legal, and that would push their tax bill up to historic heights. In all likelihood, the Nets would have to reroute salary elsewhere to make such a move feasible.
Posted on 8/4/21 at 2:54 pm to Fun Bunch
Sounds complicated. Probably easier for WAS to just send us Beal and start over.
Posted on 8/4/21 at 2:55 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
he can't. He's been pretty shitty the last 2 years,
He just finished shooting 40% from 3 on high volume. He’s a low volume player who can play defense and shoot. This is a bad take.
quote:
especially in the playoffs
He hasn’t been good in the playoffs but we have to get there first.
Posted on 8/4/21 at 2:57 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:Thanks
A Dinwiddie sign-and-trade, without a third team, might assure that. The Nets would have to take back 80 percent of Dinwiddie's outgoing salary to make a trade legal, and that would push their tax bill up to historic heights. In all likelihood, the Nets would have to reroute salary elsewhere to make such a move feasible.
This shite is so confusing. No matter what, even if a 3rd team comes in, the Nets ultimate have to take back salary up to 80%, right?
I guess I don't understand how bringing in a 3rd team helps the Nets here. Unless they're getting back something good, why would they entertain a S&T?
Posted on 8/4/21 at 3:00 pm to shel311
If it involves OKC, watch Deandre Jordan end up there with a pick to get OKC to take him.
Posted on 8/4/21 at 3:01 pm to shel311
quote:
matter what, even if a 3rd team comes in, the Nets ultimate have to take back salary up to 80%, right?
No, I think WAS just needs to send out 80% so Dinwiddie fits for them.
If there wasn’t at least a 3rd team the Nets would have to take that all back. But if a 3rd or more team is added then they can take the salary instead of the Nets.
Posted on 8/4/21 at 3:05 pm to SLafourche07
The Athletic NBA
@TheAthleticNBA
·
1m
Hearing the most likely outcome is that the Spencer Dinwiddie sign-and-trade becomes part of the Russell Westbrook trade,
@johnhollinger
writes.
“That would make it, at minimum, a four-team deal (Nets, Lakers, Wizards, Pacers)."
@TheAthleticNBA
·
1m
Hearing the most likely outcome is that the Spencer Dinwiddie sign-and-trade becomes part of the Russell Westbrook trade,
@johnhollinger
writes.
“That would make it, at minimum, a four-team deal (Nets, Lakers, Wizards, Pacers)."
Posted on 8/4/21 at 3:06 pm to shel311
quote:
expanding across 6-8 different franchises
This post was edited on 8/4/21 at 3:09 pm
Posted on 8/4/21 at 3:06 pm to SLafourche07
quote:Never knew that, interesting stuff. Thanks
No, I think WAS just needs to send out 80% so Dinwiddie fits for them.
So WAS gets Dinwiddie, sends out the 80% or part of it to another team, but sends other shite to BKN.
That and maybe 4-5 more teams involved lol.
Posted on 8/4/21 at 3:10 pm to shel311
quote:
This shite is so confusing.
This is the best thing about this board. I don't don't shite about how salaries have to fit in the NBA or what pick is from which deal and all that. It's nice to have people that get it and explain it so well.
Posted on 8/4/21 at 3:12 pm to TigerLunatik
Mac:
quote:
Id expect Pels to be involved in this Dinwiddie deal....
Posted on 8/4/21 at 3:12 pm to LesGeaux45
Hope he's correct.
I'm not even going to begin to speculate as to how with 6-8 teams involved.
I'm not even going to begin to speculate as to how with 6-8 teams involved.
Posted on 8/4/21 at 3:13 pm to Fun Bunch
I wonder if we're taking back Bertans and getting a pick for our troubles.
Posted on 8/4/21 at 3:14 pm to Fun Bunch
Prolly just taking on a shite stain player or something.
Posted on 8/4/21 at 3:14 pm to LesGeaux45
I could see that happening. He totally fits.
Horrid contract though.
Horrid contract though.
Posted on 8/4/21 at 3:15 pm to Fun Bunch
The Athletic does say the Pacers may be involved. If we end up with Pels talk legend Myles Turner somehow this place is gonna go from six to midnight 
Posted on 8/4/21 at 3:16 pm to LesGeaux45
Or Brogdon, for that matter. Neither will happen, but we can dream
Page 47 of 97
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News