Started By
Message

re: 'Thor: Love and Thunder' A Disaster: Compared To 'Batman & Robin'

Posted on 7/3/22 at 10:58 pm to
Posted by ThanosIsADemocrat
The Garden
Member since May 2018
9395 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 10:58 pm to
quote:

Which translates to the fact that you cannot actually connect the two. Good to know.


As you stated, you went to public school and by your own admission a bad one. So if that’s your “translation” then my secondary point about public schools is correct. Which would make sense about your Noah’s Ark is fact thing.

Also, do you have kids?
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
30886 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 11:48 pm to
quote:

As you stated, you went to public school and by your own admission a bad one. So if that’s your “translation” then my secondary point about public schools is correct. Which would make sense about your Noah’s Ark is fact thing.

Also, do you have kids?


Dude, you conflated "not having kids" to "not being masculine."

Which implies that you feel that anything else that's masculine is trumped by having children.

Considering that I know rapists with kids, idiots who got people pregnant because they didn't understand birth control with kids, etc - I disagree with the notion that one directly correlates to the other.

It implies that there's never been a masculine priest (well, except for the ones that broke their vows - weird take).

By your logic, some "not masculine" folks:
John Cena
Keanu Reeves
Nick Offerman
Christopher Walken
Louis Armstrong
Bob Barker
Raymond Burr
Roger Casement
William Conrad
Francis Drake

To name a few.

No, no kids. I made that decision a long time ago and my wife did the same, so neither was either forced into something or giving up something to enter the relationship.

You know what? I don't mind the company I'm in.

Now, want to actually say why you feel not having kids is a default "not masculine" thing? Or do you feel the person you replying to was not having kids for a very specific reason that's not masculine? If so, then say it.
Posted by RobbBobb
Matt Flynn, BCS MVP
Member since Feb 2007
27906 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 11:49 pm to
quote:

Civil War had nothing to do with slavery.

Not the brightest bulb in the socket, are we?

You are living in the exact same political atmosphere as those prior to the Civil War, and yet you chose to make it a pivotal piece of your argument. And I know your feelings are now hurt because I hurled an insult your way. So let me define it for you

If we get into another Civil War, it wont be over abortion, or gays, or trannies, or guns. It will be about one side getting fed up about being told what conditions they have to live with, or face financial ruin. Just the same as the 1st war. Slavery was the cornerstone in their financial ruin plan against the south

Right about now youre saying "Thats a bunch of BS"

OK then, tell me scholar, what other nation on this planet fought its own people in order to free slaves? Slavery was a worldwide enterprise, and yet no other wars? So if you cannot list other countries that fought to free slaves, guess what?

Then our Civil War was not about slavery. Because we could have come to agreement like every other nation on the planet, if it was

History reminder: The Whig party collapsed 4 years prior to the Civil War. They reemerged as the republican party and somehow defeated the larger Dem party in their first time at the ballots. Hmmmm. Thats when states started succeeding. Not when the shots were fired, but when the votes came in.

The war was about control. Not slaves. Control. Exactly like today. And here is the final nail in your coffin
quote:

If I could save the union without freeing any slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. - Abraham Lincoln, a full year after the start of the Civil War


Posted by ThanosIsADemocrat
The Garden
Member since May 2018
9395 posts
Posted on 7/4/22 at 12:01 am to
quote:

Dude, you conflated "not having kids" to "not being masculine."


I said reproducing is masculine. And that it’s funny that non producing men question a family mans masculinity.
quote:

No, no kids. I made that decision a long time ago and my wife did the same, so neither was either forced into something or giving up something to enter the relationship. You know what? I don't mind the company I'm in. Now, want to actually say why you feel not having kids is a default "not masculine" thing? Or do you feel the person you replying to was not having kids for a very specific reason that's not masculine? If so, then say it.


As father, and internet father (a list that is growing), yeah I read your whiny diatribe, and become emphatic for the low-t problem that is plaguing the country.
I do understand why your wife chose not to have kids with you. So, son from a shitty public school, you reek of estrogen. In case that wasn’t clear.

A guy like Ben Shapiro is 100x the man you are.
Thank you for not reproducing.

This post was edited on 7/4/22 at 5:04 am
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50495 posts
Posted on 7/4/22 at 12:25 am to
quote:

It was just an analogy, but I assure you that religion has not just been quietly polite and non-intrusive.


That's true. Islam exists.
Posted by Hayekian serf
GA
Member since Dec 2020
2545 posts
Posted on 7/4/22 at 5:45 am to
It’s a marvel movie, it’s pretty certain to be dog crap.
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
30886 posts
Posted on 7/4/22 at 6:18 am to
Awww, well at least you tried.

Failed, but tried.
Posted by AUCom96
Alabama
Member since May 2020
4994 posts
Posted on 7/4/22 at 7:33 am to
quote:

It was just an analogy, but I assure you that religion has not just been quietly polite and non-intrusive.



It's an interesting analogy, and one I would have agreed with around 40 years ago.

Then, religious content was commonly preached from the podium of most politicians.

TV shows and movies often featured content related to christian teaching.

Some groups had success censoring or outright banning material they found offensive or "dangerous", even attempting to ruin lives and careers with lengthy show trials.

In other words, exactly what the proponents of leftist ESG governance are doing in this country today, including in EVERYTHING Disney produces.

Yeah, the new Thor is going to suck. Taika Waititi has a good sense of humor, but Disney is doubling down and Taika is one of them.
Posted by Tigerfan56
Member since May 2010
10520 posts
Posted on 7/4/22 at 7:54 am to
quote:

America isn't interested in woke bullshite. If Disney fricked post Ragnarok Thor up, well it won't be surprising


No one has a better beat on what America wants than the southern baws living in a homogeneous population of 5,000 people
Posted by Tigerfan56
Member since May 2010
10520 posts
Posted on 7/4/22 at 7:56 am to
quote:

As father, and internet father (a list that is growing), yeah I read your whiny diatribe, and become emphatic for the low-t problem that is plaguing the country. I do understand why your wife chose not to have kids with you. So, son from a shitty public school, you reek of estrogen. In case that wasn’t clear.


Woah, you’re so masculine bro! The most masculine. Testosterone for days. What a man!
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84116 posts
Posted on 7/4/22 at 8:03 am to
quote:

No one has a better beat on what America wants than the southern baws living in a homogeneous population of 5,000 people


Much in the same way the same 5000 freaks that are loud on Twitter know what's best for us.
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
61263 posts
Posted on 7/4/22 at 8:15 am to
quote:

No one has a better beat on what America wants than the southern baws living in a homogeneous population of 5,000 people




Homogeneous? Do you have a clue what the south is like? You think a bunch of Hollywood execs from Malibu and Palm Springs have their thumb on the pulse of America? What a joke.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57316 posts
Posted on 7/4/22 at 10:48 am to
quote:

Much in the same way the same 5000 BOTS that are loud on Twitter know what's best for us.


FIFY

Twitter isn’t real. It’s a psyop.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57316 posts
Posted on 7/4/22 at 10:52 am to
quote:

Clearly you’ve never watched The Lost Boys


You shut your mouth

Lost Boys is a masterpiece

and no where near as homo erotic as Top Gun
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57316 posts
Posted on 7/4/22 at 10:55 am to
quote:

I agree it’s happening but I don’t disagree with it because it doesn’t ultimately matter. Nor should it matter. If it does, then that’s certainly a you problem and not a Disney problem


No…it’s a national security risk

This “agenda” isn’t really about freeing the queers. It’s about breaking down and dividing our society so we can be more easily controlled by the oligarchy and led into totalitarianism via a social credit system.

THAT’s the real issue
This post was edited on 7/4/22 at 10:56 am
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 7Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram