- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The OFFICIAL Man of Steel Discussion and ***SPOILERS*** Thread
Posted on 6/17/13 at 3:47 pm to F machine
Posted on 6/17/13 at 3:47 pm to F machine
quote:
Has anyone seen this. Some consulting firm came up with this.
Hadn't seen it, but that actually seems low in terms of body count. I'm just not seeing how, in a city as congested as Metropolis (see NYC) you could get people out of highrises and away from the area fast enough once the world builder thing hit downtown and started getting after it.
But it's damages like this that I think are going to be a big part of MoS2...you can't just pretend a large part of Metropolis didn't just get terraformed.
Posted on 6/17/13 at 4:02 pm to GeauxTigerTM
quote:
If you're honest, I bet you come back and say it's not as good as you remember it being.
While I'm a huge fan of the originals, I have to agree with this. I watched the original one right the next day after Man of Steel and wasn't as impressed with the older one as I remembered it. After viewing, I thought the older one moved slower and lacked action.
Posted on 6/17/13 at 5:31 pm to kballa6
The origin was better told in the Conner version, but I like how it showed having powers can be a problem
Posted on 6/17/13 at 7:42 pm to WhoDats10
Still haven't seen it, but will tomorrow. Give you my opinions tomorrow, but I'm in disbelief over the T-Meter though. Looking forward to hopefully going on a rant about critics just wanting to bash something because they want to bring down a filmmaker down to their level like they did Jackson and the Hobbit.
Posted on 6/17/13 at 8:19 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
OMLandshark
My comrade and brother from another mother.
Good to see you back from banland.
Really looking forward to your thoughts on this one. I really loved it and thought it fricking delivered. This was the Superman movie we've been waiting decades for and it's one where he actually fights with the gloves off. This is one occasion where the critics are way off on a movie and expecting something different.
By the way, I think DC really has a good opportunity to make some decent money by making an animated prequel featuring Krypton, Jor-El and Lara, and General Zod and Faora and the events that led up to Kal-El's departure and then Krypton's death. Krypton in this movie is vastly different from Donner's block of ice Krypton and it's a lot more livelier and advanced. There's enough source material out there to do one. It would be something; a comic book movie without the superhero and it could work. They're already doing great things with their animated flicks, why not do one on something like this?
This post was edited on 6/17/13 at 8:37 pm
Posted on 6/17/13 at 8:25 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Still haven't seen it, but will tomorrow. Give you my opinions tomorrow, but I'm in disbelief over the T-Meter though. Looking forward to hopefully going on a rant about critics just wanting to bash something because they want to bring down a filmmaker down to their level like they did Jackson and the Hobbit.
From a technical perspective you'll love AND hate this movie at the same time.
So much awesome swimming in a pool of "ehhh MAAYBEE they coulda done it THIS way..."
Posted on 6/17/13 at 8:44 pm to theunknownknight
Oh something just occurred to me, why Lois might not recognize Clark. Remember that one scene where they kissed? Remember superman power where with a kiss he can erase your memories?
That's right.
I think if they want to make this lex more sinster but in a good way, they should make lex gather up the families of those that hated superman and blame him for the invasion and slowly test the man of steel reaction time through crime and other disasters.
I think the destruction should be bigger to really push superman mentally to the limits making him be everywhere at once and even if he say one person another is dying someplace else.
That's right.
quote:
In many storylines, Lex's problem with Supes is that Superman is an outsider/non-human. Basically, how could humanity trust some alien to be its savior. It could be rooted in jealousy because Lex had to work hard for his power while Superman was simply born with them.
If done right, the sequel could be excellent. I doubt we'll see the level of destruction that we saw in Man of Steel. Based on the hidden LuthorCorp stuff in MoS, Lex is probably going to be the billionaire CEO instead of the Gene Hackman version where he was some underground scientist. Lex could hold a grudge against Superman for the destruction in Metropolis and make it where the public turns on Superman.
I think if they want to make this lex more sinster but in a good way, they should make lex gather up the families of those that hated superman and blame him for the invasion and slowly test the man of steel reaction time through crime and other disasters.
I think the destruction should be bigger to really push superman mentally to the limits making him be everywhere at once and even if he say one person another is dying someplace else.
This post was edited on 6/17/13 at 8:49 pm
Posted on 6/17/13 at 9:01 pm to Duzz
Remember that one scene where they kissed? Remember superman power where with a kiss he can erase your memories?
That's right.
++++++++++++++++++++
Dude...she recognized him.
That's right.
++++++++++++++++++++
Dude...she recognized him.
Posted on 6/17/13 at 10:26 pm to udtiger
Bout to watch it again with some friends
And its a 10:15 showing AND THERES STILL A BABY IN HERE SOMEHOW
Like what the frick
And its a 10:15 showing AND THERES STILL A BABY IN HERE SOMEHOW
Like what the frick
Posted on 6/17/13 at 10:35 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
And its a 10:15 showing AND THERES STILL A BABY IN HERE SOMEHOW
Some people are inconsiderate idiots!
I was amazed at the number of children under the age of 10 at my showing this weekend.
There's no way I'd show my 5 year old with the amount of cussing and violence in that movie.
Posted on 6/17/13 at 10:45 pm to TigerWerm
I thought I was the only showing that had a fricking baby carriage in the theater and the baby started to cry during the final battle scene...and the mother stayed there..
WTF, isn't there an age limits for infants?
WTF, isn't there an age limits for infants?
Posted on 6/17/13 at 11:13 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
AND THERES STILL A BABY IN HERE SOMEHOW
Like what the frick
This happened a while back when I saw Star Trek for a second time.
Man, frick those people. That's one of the top five most inconsiderate douchey things you can do to strangers around you. Inconsiderate douchenozzle a-holes. You should get thrown out of the theater for pulling that crap.
When are people going to learn the following?
You are not supposed to bring babies and little kids to grown arse adult movies that wouldn't even interest them and/or is too violent and graphic for them. Hell, don't bring them to the movies at all.
People are fricking idiots.
Don't bring the babies and little kids or don't come at all.
Sidenote, here's who I hate in no certain order, at the movies: babies and kids, cellphones, talking, frequent pissers, that guy next to me who absolutely must have his third coke of the movie, high schoolers, and the person with their feet on my chair.
Posted on 6/18/13 at 1:45 am to udtiger
quote:
Dude...she recognized him.
I can't believe people are discussing this. It's clear as day and in every interview with Snyder, Goyer & Nolan they discuss how it's one thing they refused to do with the Lois character because it doesn't make sense realistically.
Posted on 6/18/13 at 6:54 am to Sentrius
quote:
A BABY IN HERE
I think the AMC at MoL specifically prohibits infant/young kid at late night showings.
Posted on 6/18/13 at 6:58 am to LfcSU3520
quote:
I can't believe people are discussing this. It's clear as day and in every interview with Snyder, Goyer & Nolan they discuss how it's one thing they refused to do with the Lois character because it doesn't make sense realistically.
It wasnt really "discussed". It was just me misinterpreting it and we cleared it up a long way back
Posted on 6/18/13 at 8:25 am to Sentrius
quote:
Sidenote, here's who I hate in no certain order, at the movies: babies and kids, cellphones, talking, frequent pissers, that guy next to me who absolutely must have his third coke of the movie, high schoolers, and the person with their feet on my chair.
:scans for the words black people:
Posted on 6/18/13 at 9:01 am to Sentrius
quote:
I really loved it and thought it fricking delivered. This was the Superman movie we've been waiting decades for and it's one where he actually fights with the gloves off. This is one occasion where the critics are way off on a movie and expecting something different.
I agree. I really have no idea what more the critics could want. It's a great summer action blockbuster with a pretty good story. I mean, what the frick do they want from Superman? Schindler's List?
quote:
Dude...she recognized him.
I don't see how anyone ever disputed this. It was obvious she recognized him.
Posted on 6/18/13 at 9:19 am to F machine
Back to the open bed/pod.
If that ship was 20,000 years old, then there's no way whoever was in it is still alive.
If that ship was 20,000 years old, then there's no way whoever was in it is still alive.
Posted on 6/18/13 at 9:45 am to iwyLSUiwy
Finally saw it.
Lets get to it....
I thought it was great
I did think it was kinda rushed from the scene when he first gets in the scout ship and then starts flying around in his new suit. But im the kinda guy that loves back story.
There could be 3 hours of explaining his past to him and only 20 minutes of action and i would've been okay with it. I know thats weird, but thats me.
I thought Shannon was great as THIS version of Zod. He was a broken man with a single purpose so its understandable that his rage would take over every now and then.
Terrence Stamp on the otherhand approached things like he was a god, which is why he always so calm and collected.Shannon never even considered this. He just wanted to save Krypton.
I thought Henry Cavill was great as the Superman of the new generation. I also found he looked alot like Reeve at times, especially when he was staring up into the world machine's gravity lazer thing. I also enjoyed how he was a brawler when he fought but it was clear that Zod and his cronies had fight training.
Some things i noticed/theories:
First:
A little bit of humor i picked up. When supes and zod are fighting on top of a construction site in the final scene right before zod shakes off his suit and shows superman that he can fly, Zod punches Superman into a construction tower. The tower has a safety sign on it that says "No Accidents in 130 Days", well as soon as Superman hits the sign the numbers fall off and it changes to "No Accidents in 0 Days". I thought that was humorous.
Second:
Im in agreement with the poster that anyone who was in that pod 18,000 years ago SHOULD be dead by now. I'm going to assume that even under a yellow sun, kryptonians age, albeit much slower.
I actually expected them to go in sort of a Prometheus direction with this and say that Kryptonians are the ancestors of humans (which would explain the physical similarities when it comes to looks), but I think that wouldve just opened a whole nother can of worms that wouldve made the movie way too complex
But I could see this revisited in future versions. Or I could see it as a brainiac or supergirl character that was in the pod but I think they wouldve been frozen in the ice because, again, I dont see how they survive for 18,000 years even at a slower aging rate.
OK, im done for now, TLDR, wutevs, loved that shite
Lets get to it....
I thought it was great
I did think it was kinda rushed from the scene when he first gets in the scout ship and then starts flying around in his new suit. But im the kinda guy that loves back story.
There could be 3 hours of explaining his past to him and only 20 minutes of action and i would've been okay with it. I know thats weird, but thats me.
I thought Shannon was great as THIS version of Zod. He was a broken man with a single purpose so its understandable that his rage would take over every now and then.
Terrence Stamp on the otherhand approached things like he was a god, which is why he always so calm and collected.Shannon never even considered this. He just wanted to save Krypton.
I thought Henry Cavill was great as the Superman of the new generation. I also found he looked alot like Reeve at times, especially when he was staring up into the world machine's gravity lazer thing. I also enjoyed how he was a brawler when he fought but it was clear that Zod and his cronies had fight training.
Some things i noticed/theories:
First:
A little bit of humor i picked up. When supes and zod are fighting on top of a construction site in the final scene right before zod shakes off his suit and shows superman that he can fly, Zod punches Superman into a construction tower. The tower has a safety sign on it that says "No Accidents in 130 Days", well as soon as Superman hits the sign the numbers fall off and it changes to "No Accidents in 0 Days". I thought that was humorous.
Second:
Im in agreement with the poster that anyone who was in that pod 18,000 years ago SHOULD be dead by now. I'm going to assume that even under a yellow sun, kryptonians age, albeit much slower.
I actually expected them to go in sort of a Prometheus direction with this and say that Kryptonians are the ancestors of humans (which would explain the physical similarities when it comes to looks), but I think that wouldve just opened a whole nother can of worms that wouldve made the movie way too complex
But I could see this revisited in future versions. Or I could see it as a brainiac or supergirl character that was in the pod but I think they wouldve been frozen in the ice because, again, I dont see how they survive for 18,000 years even at a slower aging rate.
OK, im done for now, TLDR, wutevs, loved that shite
Popular
Back to top



0





