- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 'Supergirl' Discussion Thread: First Reactions, Box Office, 57% tomatometer
Posted on 6/22/26 at 8:18 pm to RLDSC FAN
Posted on 6/22/26 at 8:18 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
Yeah, it's a mistake going with Supergirl.
It's the same mistake they made with the Snyderverse.
There, they wanted us to jump in to the middle of a story already in progress.
Here, they want us to jump in to movies about side characters before we get this universe's Batman, Wonder Woman, Flash, Aquaman, Cyborg, Robin, Nightwing, Superboy. Seriously, the list of characters more important than Supergirl is VERY long.
This post was edited on 6/22/26 at 8:21 pm
Posted on 6/22/26 at 8:38 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:Those can be hinky, though
People try to argue with me about ancillary revenues lol
Some pay WB, and some are paid by WB
Some split profits, some pay for license and keep profits
It is so hard to say
I assume the numbers in the article I read are finessed
But maybe they can break even with that and BO
Posted on 6/22/26 at 8:40 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Here, they want us to jump in to movies about side characters before we get this universe's Batman, Wonder Woman, Flash, Aquaman, Cyborg, Robin, Nightwing, Superboy. Seriously, the list of characters more important than Supergirl is VERY long.
I don't disagree with you, but I would argue that Robin, Nightwing, and Superboy are all side characters as well (unless your goal is a Teen Titans movie before introducing Supergirl)
Posted on 6/22/26 at 8:56 pm to Roaad
quote:
But maybe they can break even with that and BO
It'll lose money, no doubt. I'm just saying that there's more than just box office for these big blockbusters
Posted on 6/22/26 at 9:00 pm to RLDSC FAN
If it can manage $100 million clean from ancillary, which I am not sure they will
And get $150ish million (also unlikely) in domestic BO by the end of the run
I think they could break even once streaming licenses come in
They have done almost no marketing outside social media, that I've seen
And get $150ish million (also unlikely) in domestic BO by the end of the run
I think they could break even once streaming licenses come in
They have done almost no marketing outside social media, that I've seen
Posted on 6/22/26 at 9:25 pm to skrayper
quote:
I don't disagree with you, but I would argue that Robin, Nightwing, and Superboy are all side characters as well (unless your goal is a Teen Titans movie before introducing Supergirl)
I don't disagree. I just think they're much more "known" by the average individual than Supergirl. Especially Robin and Superboy. And have a lot more history to pull from.
This post was edited on 6/22/26 at 9:30 pm
Posted on 6/22/26 at 10:20 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Here, they want us to jump in to movies about side characters before we get this universe's Batman, Wonder Woman, Flash, Aquaman, Cyborg, Robin, Nightwing, Superboy. Seriously, the list of characters more important than Supergirl is VERY long.
Because James Gunn knows he can make the side characters quirky and rebellious. That’s the only thing he knows how to do other than injecting himself into marketing.
Putting that a-hole in charge of the DCU will prove to be a huge mistake.
This post was edited on 6/22/26 at 10:21 pm
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:40 am to FairhopeTider
Out of the theater reactions are out. Every one I've seen has said the villains are very bad and the movie is about as mediocre as you can get. Not going to waste money on a ticket for this one
Posted on 6/23/26 at 5:57 am to Civildawg
- “profoundly awful, Milly miscast”
- “heroic ideals completely missing”
- “Double down on Kal-El being sent to earth to conquer it” with the child bride stuff that was mentioned in Superman
Gunn is an absolute moron
He specifically said he isn’t going to make something without a great script. And made a point about casting the right actors. He failed at both here.
I knew this shite was going off the rails with the peacemaker “nazi” retardism. Warnings were there in Superman with the conquering earth message from Jor-El
X reactions are hating it
This post was edited on 6/23/26 at 6:05 am
Posted on 6/23/26 at 8:00 am to Proximo
The main actress saying this movie isn’t for “Christian dads” is going to do this movie wonders
Posted on 6/23/26 at 8:03 am to RLDSC FAN
Posted on 6/23/26 at 8:12 am to Proximo
quote:
profoundly awful, Milly miscast”
- “heroic ideals completely missing”
- “Double down on Kal-El being sent to earth to conquer it” with the child bride stuff that was mentioned in Superman
Gunn is an absolute moron
He specifically said he isn’t going to make something without a great script. And made a point about casting the right actors. He failed at both here.
I knew this shite was going off the rails with the peacemaker “nazi” retardism. Warnings were there in Superman with the conquering earth message from Jor-El
X reactions are hating it
For all of the discussion about actors and casting the worst choice was mixing Gunn with Superman
Posted on 6/23/26 at 8:15 am to molsusports
quote:
For all of the discussion about actors and casting the worst choice was mixing Gunn with Superman
The child bride thing in Superman and now Supergirl is throwing me off. Is this some sort of commentary on why he was cancelled that he’s shoehorning in?
Makes me wonder
Posted on 6/23/26 at 8:20 am to theunknownknight
quote:
The main actress saying this movie isn’t for “Christian dads” is going to do this movie wonders
intentionally obtuse
Posted on 6/23/26 at 8:21 am to theunknownknight
quote:
The main actress saying this movie isn’t for “Christian dads” is going to do this movie wonders
She’s also making comments about how proud she is that Supergirl is a LGBTQ icon (she’s not).
I said it in the other thread: this young lady couldn’t be doing a better job of sabotaging this film if she were making a concerted effort to do so.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 8:59 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
Here, they want us to jump in to movies about side characters before we get this universe's Batman, Wonder Woman, Flash, Aquaman, Cyborg, Robin, Nightwing, Superboy. Seriously, the list of characters more important than Supergirl is VERY long.
Just as no one gives a frick about Hawkgirl and Terrific yet Gunn insisted on shoving those frickheads down our throats while turning the only decent one (Green Lantern) into Lloyd Christmas.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 9:04 am to RLDSC FAN
This movie will get lots of critic love for no other reason than an outspoken female lead and nerd reviewers knighting for it and wanting to keep DC access.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 9:05 am to PuertoRicanBlaze
quote:
Just as no one gives a frick about Hawkgirl and Terrific yet Gunn insisted on shoving those frickheads down our throats while turning the only decent one (Green Lantern) into Lloyd Christmas.
To be fair it was comic accurate for that particular lantern. I liked Terrific
Don’t like the Gunn leather costumes much
Posted on 6/23/26 at 9:10 am to molsusports
She's as dumb as she looks. I just watched an interview of her complimenting the director for always being physically on set. Uhhhh... That's like complimenting a cashier for always running a register.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 9:12 am to PuertoRicanBlaze
Terrific was the best character in Superman
Hands down
Hands down
Popular
Back to top



3








