- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Tomatometer Watch - 95% 8.2/10 (185 reviews)
Posted on 12/16/15 at 6:16 pm to WeBleedCrimson
Posted on 12/16/15 at 6:16 pm to WeBleedCrimson
You can almost see the whole movie online already, the parts I have seen have been pretty good and pretty eh.
Posted on 12/16/15 at 6:41 pm to Dam Guide
Well you won't know until you see the whole thing. Anything can be meh taken out of context.
Edit: how much does it take to bring the percentage up? There have been 8 positive reviews since the last negative one
Edit: how much does it take to bring the percentage up? There have been 8 positive reviews since the last negative one
This post was edited on 12/16/15 at 6:52 pm
Posted on 12/16/15 at 7:16 pm to WicKed WayZ
I respect Rotten Tomatoes but the score being pulled down a little bit smacks to me of guys that held off to see how this played out and are doing negative reviews to stick out for click bait.
Posted on 12/16/15 at 7:26 pm to Scoop
Happens with every good movie. The bad reviews on there for Guardians of the Galaxy are hilariously desperate for attention.
This post was edited on 12/16/15 at 7:28 pm
Posted on 12/16/15 at 7:28 pm to RollTide1987
Tickets for tomorrow night's first showing firmly in my grasp, muhahahahah.
Posted on 12/16/15 at 7:32 pm to Scoop
I agree, the one from the Spanish paper was hilariously bad and he rated it rotten simply because the movie wasnt his taste.
Another rotten review was from a guy that has only reviewed 3 movies EVER. There are only two rotten from top critics and one of them was a 2.5/4.
Another rotten review was from a guy that has only reviewed 3 movies EVER. There are only two rotten from top critics and one of them was a 2.5/4.
Posted on 12/16/15 at 7:46 pm to WicKed WayZ
I predicted 87% building in critics that want to go against the grain to seem smarter than everyone else.
The fact that we are mid 90's means even those guys are all in.
The fact that we are mid 90's means even those guys are all in.
Posted on 12/16/15 at 7:49 pm to WicKed WayZ
I'm guilty of helping the click bait troll reviewers.
I've gone there and looked at what assholes didn't like Shawshank Redemption or something like that just out of curiousity.
I've gone there and looked at what assholes didn't like Shawshank Redemption or something like that just out of curiousity.
Posted on 12/16/15 at 7:53 pm to Scoop
Want to see hipster and pretentious? Armond White.
Check out his reviews for any of the best Pixar movies: Up, Toy Story 2, etc.
He doesn't review big movies anymore though.
Check out his reviews for any of the best Pixar movies: Up, Toy Story 2, etc.
He doesn't review big movies anymore though.
Posted on 12/16/15 at 9:40 pm to WicKed WayZ
quote:
Well you won't know until you see the whole thing. Anything can be meh taken out of context
I have seen most scenes with this character. i can't really make a comparison without it being a spoiler. Just didn't like it.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 12:25 am to RollTide1987
Got my tickets for the 8:20 PM showing tomorrow night in downtown Honolulu. I can't wait!
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:11 am to Dam Guide
Well that's weird because Driver is usually considered a pretty good actor.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 10:12 am to ell_13
quote:
Want to see hipster and pretentious? Armond White
Rotten Tomatoes basically said "frick You" to that guy and no longer include his reviews, is my understanding.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 10:16 am to Scoop
Some of these "rotten" reviews do not seem bad to me, like this one:
or this one:
I don't know how RT determines if something is rotten or not. Some critics were harsh in tone but gave it 2.5/4, but that is considered rotten. There are a total of 10 rotten reviews out of 185 total, and I would say maybe 2 or 3 truly despised the film per their comments and rating.
quote:
Abrams is also too susceptible to the solemn self-mythologising that always threatened to spoil the fun of any Star Wars film. He hasn't made a terrible picture -- just a safe one, where the farthest reaches of fantasy feel merely routine.
or this one:
quote:
Somewhere along the way, Abrams begins delivering everything we expect, as opposed to those nebulous wonders we didn't know we wanted.
I don't know how RT determines if something is rotten or not. Some critics were harsh in tone but gave it 2.5/4, but that is considered rotten. There are a total of 10 rotten reviews out of 185 total, and I would say maybe 2 or 3 truly despised the film per their comments and rating.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 10:17 am to LeonPhelps
I'm excited to see the film, but I must admit that I'm disappointed with what I'm hearing so far. Apparently the movie plays it safe and is just a rehash of a new hope. One review I saw is even calling it "A similar hope."
Posted on 12/17/15 at 10:19 am to LeonPhelps
Those reviews are ridiculous. It's a Star Wars movie for Christ's sake. It's just supposed to be a fun film. That's it. 
Posted on 12/17/15 at 10:21 am to Tigerdew
quote:
Those reviews are ridiculous.
These movie critics have to justify their ridiculous jobs somehow, so they make it sound like they are pondering life's very existence with every review.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 10:22 am to LeonPhelps
The purpose of being a reviewer is to let your audience know what's good and why and what's bad and why. While people have different views and opinions and that's a good thing, Armond was/is basically alone in how he views movies. So his audience was never those who agreed with him but rather those who wanted to argue/hate those opinions.
RT just gave people who hated him easier access to his reviews and while it drove clicks, it was getting out of hand both on RT and wherever his review was published.
People never understood that he's not a troll. He's been very consistent for decades. He does understand movies. His view was just too... unique is the nicest word I can think of.
RT just gave people who hated him easier access to his reviews and while it drove clicks, it was getting out of hand both on RT and wherever his review was published.
People never understood that he's not a troll. He's been very consistent for decades. He does understand movies. His view was just too... unique is the nicest word I can think of.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 10:35 am to RLDSC FAN
I thought the same thing but I think it hits a little harder per a major spoiler I saw on social media yesterday and I no longer think the movie is safe. I don't think you have anything to worry about. I'm sure it's similar to ANH but I'm sure it's different enough to be enjoyable just like Creed. Creed is very similar to Rocky but it's just different enough to be a really really good film.
But stay off social media, I had a major part of the movie spoiled for me. I've signed out of Facebook and Twitter until tonight at 10.
But stay off social media, I had a major part of the movie spoiled for me. I've signed out of Facebook and Twitter until tonight at 10.
Popular
Back to top


1







