Started By
Message

re: My obligatory Oscar rant

Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:50 am to
Posted by ShamelessPel
Metairie
Member since Apr 2013
13033 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Oh and Inception is one of the most vastly overrated movies in this lifetime.


This post was edited on 3/3/14 at 9:51 am
Posted by DirtyMikeandtheBoys
Member since May 2011
19467 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:51 am to
quote:

"24 Years A Slave"


Made me remember this LINK
Posted by BCMCubs
Colorado
Member since Nov 2011
22146 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:53 am to
quote:

It paid homage to another film where a fire extinguisher was used to project that character through space


Which movie?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465716 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:53 am to
quote:

t got to the point of oversaturation with all the shite that Belfort kept getting into.

i had given up on the film until the "Quaalude" scene. that left me with enough spinach in my system to finish

the scenes with the police were worthless in the theatrical cut of the movie (i presume the full cut had more on that)
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:54 am to
quote:

Which movie?



Posted by Patrick_Bateman
Member since Jan 2012
17823 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:54 am to
quote:

I enjoyed both movies. I think the voters got it right. Gravity was an amazing achievement in visual direction that also maintained humanity. Cuaron deserved his Oscar.

But 12 Years a Slave was an extremely well made adapted screenplay that won over even some the biggest cynics. It was a fascinating story and moving story. Every performance was pitch perfect and the cinematography was terrific.
All of this.
Posted by Tactical1
Denham Springs
Member since May 2010
27129 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 10:30 am to
I managed to see about 5 of the Best Picture nominees.

Her
Gravity
Captain Phillips
American Hustle
Dallas Buyers Club

Out of those I thought Gravity deserved best picture, was it the best picture? No, I don't think so. However I personally felt like after viewing Gravity, I was not watching a film but experiencing an event. It was a film experience I had not had in very long time. This didn't feel like the one man show films like Cast Away or 128 Hours (although those are great films in their own right) I thought that the Academy might recognize this type of film experience and award Best Picture to Gravity based on that.


In my opinion.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 10:49 am to
quote:

i've seen movies about slavery before. i understand completely that slavery fricking sucks. if the movie's biggest selling point is telling the "story of slavery" again with slight differences, i lose interest in seeing it. i'll watch it eventually, but my desire/interest is low


How many "slavery" movies are there, honestly? Is there this subgenre of slavery pics I'm unaware of. I can't even think of a good movie made about slavery except Django Unchained, and that came at it sideways. If we're comparing it to the other favorite, know what IS a popular subgenre? MOVIES ABOUT SPACE.

I have a toddler, so I haven't seen a thing this year (working my way through Netflix -- favorite movie last year that I saw so far is Lovelace or Upstream Color, neither nominated). But I think the win for 12 Years a Slave is fortunate because it spares some movie from being Shakespeare in Love'd, when we all dog a pretty good movie because it won an Oscar. Same thing with Juno. It's a fun movie that now gets hated on because of the Oscar. It's happening to Argo now.

The best thing to happen to a lot of good movies is to NOT win the Oscar. It's better for an epic to win, as that seems "right". Without having seen either, both Gravity and 12 Years would seem like good winners, though I'd be wary of voting for a technical film... that tends to bite you in the arse looking backwards.

And there's no way this year's winner can be as crappy as The Artist. Or God forbid, Crash.
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38409 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 10:58 am to
quote:

I have a toddler, so I haven't seen a thing this year (working my way through Netflix -- favorite movie last year that I saw so far is Lovelace or Upstream Color, neither nominated). But I think the win for 12 Years a Slave is fortunate because it spares some movie from being Shakespeare in Love'd, when we all dog a pretty good movie because it won an Oscar. Same thing with Juno. It's a fun movie that now gets hated on because of the Oscar. It's happening to Argo now.


That poor movie. Some of us will defend it.

quote:

The best thing to happen to a lot of good movies is to NOT win the Oscar. It's better for an epic to win, as that seems "right". Without having seen either, both Gravity and 12 Years would seem like good winners, though I'd be wary of voting for a technical film... that tends to bite you in the arse looking backwards.

And there's no way this year's winner can be as crappy as The Artist. Or God forbid, Crash.


Exactly. We just had a lot of good films this year. 12 Years a Slave was really good. For different reasons than Gravity. And that's fine.

Was anything TRULY great? Not so sure. Yet. Determining greatness usually requires some distance.
Posted by Overbrook
Member since May 2013
6374 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:00 am to
Gravity was boring.

I compare it to another boring but well made movie: 2001 (probably the only Kubrick movie I didn't like).
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
67404 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:55 am to
quote:

You're better than that. Isn't every movie, "one [insert gender/class/singular identifier]'s incredible experience?"


Huh? I was actually just responding to SFP and making a short, simple statement to make the point that it was not just a predictable, hackneyed "slavery is awful" movie. It wasn't the sole reason it won the Oscar, imo. The overall story itself was interesting to me, and the cast was outstanding.

And, again, I liked Gravity a lot. I just don't have a problem with it winning best director but not best picture.
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
40970 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:59 am to
quote:

That poor movie. Some of us will defend it.
I actually like the movie a lot. Watch it about once a year.

I bet half the people who hate on it, never watched it.

SPR is only Oscar worthy for the opening scene which did a good job of conveying the horrors of D-Day.

Posted by JombieZombie
Member since Nov 2009
7687 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 12:09 pm to
If you think Inception deserved consideration for best of the year, then your rant, much like the Oscars, is arbitrary.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
38927 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 12:14 pm to
My bold Oscar prediction: Next year the OP will issue another heartfelt missive how the Academy didn't pick his favorite nominee (even though he predicted it would happen.)













OP, just messing with ya. I thought 12 Years was good, not great.
Posted by bluestem75
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2007
4905 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 12:33 pm to
How many movies about/depicted slavery have there been? At least 6:

GWTW
Amistad
Roots
Glory
Django Unchanined
Uncle Tom's Cabin (yes, it was made into a movie)

to name a few. I don't think that 12YAS broke any new ground. It follows the footprint that Speilberg pioneered with Schindler's List and Saving Private Ryan by putting the audience into a historical situation from a ground level view. Its works solely on shock value--depicting brutal violence as a means to jolt the audience into the experience. It's simply been done before. It's also a cinematic version of Roots. But then, the Academy hasn't been one to acknowledge truly groundbreaking cinema...

I agree with the OP. I don't understand how the Academy can award 7 Oscars to Gravity and not give it Best Picture. It was only the 25th film to win 7 or more Oscars and only the second to win that many and NOT win BP (Cabaret--8). So most of the parts are prizeworthy, but not the whole? That defies logic (not that the Academy has to operate logically). If I were filling out a ballot and couldn't decide between two films for BP and had one film with 7 wins and another with 2, I'd vote the one with more wins as BP since it seems to me that all aspects of its creative vision were achieved at a high level. Not to mention it was kicking the other film's arse.
This post was edited on 3/3/14 at 12:35 pm
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

How many movies about/depicted slavery have there been? At least 6:

GWTW
Amistad
Roots
Glory
Django Unchanined
Uncle Tom's Cabin (yes, it was made into a movie)


OK, full stop. One, Roots isn't a movie, it's a TV show. We're down to 5. Glory is a war film, not a slavery movie. At no point does it depict slavery, it depicts freedmen. We're down to 4. Uncle Tom's Cabin is a movie so obscure I'd bet none of us knew it was a movie, not the book. GWTW isn't a slavery movie, it's a movie that proclaims the Antebellum south as a positive good and perpetuates the myth of the "happy slave".

So... spanning the entire history of movies, you were able to come up with 3 examples, and one doesn't actually depict slavery either (I'll grant Amistad is about slavery, but they are never actually sold into slavery -- it's a courtroom drama). Django Unchained makes no pretenses of realism either, but we'll grant that.

So even in your list of the wealth of slavery movies, we're really back to there only being one good movie about the experience of slavery. It's hardly well-trod ground. None of the other movies you list are actually "slavery movies" from the POV of the slaves. Maybe Amistad.

quote:

I agree with the OP. I don't understand how the Academy can award 7 Oscars to Gravity and not give it Best Picture. It was only the 25th film to win 7 or more Oscars and only the second to win that many and NOT win BP (Cabaret--8). So most of the parts are prizeworthy, but not the whole?

It's because it won the technical awards and there are more technical awards. Of the "major" awards, Gravity was largely shut out. It did not win for Screenplay, Actor, Actress, or either Supporting category. It did win for Director. It's not really that hard to logically figure out how Gravity won a bunch of awards and not Best Picture. Like I said, I haven't even seen it and I can figure out -- I'm assuming it's a technical marvel. It was honored accordingly.
Posted by Walking the Earth
Member since Feb 2013
17390 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

It's because it won the technical awards and there are more technical awards. Of the "major" awards, Gravity was largely shut out. It did not win for Screenplay, Actor, Actress, or either Supporting category. It did win for Director. It's not really that hard to logically figure out how Gravity won a bunch of awards and not Best Picture. Like I said, I haven't even seen it and I can figure out -- I'm assuming it's a technical marvel. It was honored accordingly.



Yeah, I don't get how Gravity was "snubbed" because it won technical awards and Best Director but not Best Picture.

By that logic, Dallas Buyers Club has at least an equally legitimate gripe because it actually won the two actor awards (best and supporting).
Posted by LoveThatMoney
Who knows where?
Member since Jan 2008
12374 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

So even in your list of the wealth of slavery movies, we're really back to there only being one good movie about the experience of slavery. It's hardly well-trod ground. None of the other movies you list are actually "slavery movies" from the POV of the slaves. Maybe Amistad.


Also note that it took a British director, two British actors, and a Kenyan actress to bring the film to life. Like it or not, American slavery remains a very touchy topic even today in America, so the audience and the people producing/starring in the film will approach it with caution, which explains why so few truly great movies about slavery have been made.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
62960 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 2:08 pm to
People vote for their friends. I was shocked that the homes didn't win for 12 Years, but that's why. MM is a fine actor, but that wasn't the best of the year.
Posted by bluestem75
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2007
4905 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

Roots isn't a movie


Doesn't matter--the whole point was that the subject matter hasn't been treated, when, in reality, it has.

Amistad depicts the horror and brutality about the slave trade--a film by, guess who, Speilberg, which further proves my point that McQueen is riffing on a style of filmmaking introduced and perfected by Speilberg.

I left out Beloved--which tells the story of a woman who murders her child to keep her out of, you guessed it, slavery.

This subject has been treated from multiple perspectives and treated directly through film before.

A technical Oscar is still an Oscar. I'll point out that Gravity went up against 12 Years head to head in three categories and it won 2 out of 3. Cinematography, Directing, Editing, and Score are not considered "technical" categories--all wins by Gravity. (Editing and Picture go hand-in-hand quite often, btw.)

12 Years won only 3 out of its 9 nominations--so the Academy felt that in 6 categories, other films/performances were artistically/technically better (Director, Actor, Supporting Actor, Prod Design, Costume Design, Editing)--and failed to capture a Cinematography nomination. That's a paltry record and opens the door to question the Academy's overall affection for the film.

12 Years got its arse handed to it last night--and not just by Gravity.
This post was edited on 3/3/14 at 2:29 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram