
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Kingdom of Heaven
Posted on 8/12/26 at 5:37 pm
Posted on 8/12/26 at 5:37 pm
I started watching the director's (Ridley Scott) cut of Kingdom of Heaven last night, a movie which I'd never experienced. I started watching in my small 'getaway from everyone else' spot in the house and got 20 minutes in and decided this deserves watching on a bigger screen and much better sound system.
I think I'm in for a visual treat. Hope it's not disappointing but I've enjoyed many Ridley Scott movies. Blade Runner being my favorite, which did poorly at the box office but which went on to become a cult classic and define modern science fiction. So I'm thinking it might be good. Certainly the tales of Baelin are a part of history and so it will be interesting to watch.
I think I'm in for a visual treat. Hope it's not disappointing but I've enjoyed many Ridley Scott movies. Blade Runner being my favorite, which did poorly at the box office but which went on to become a cult classic and define modern science fiction. So I'm thinking it might be good. Certainly the tales of Baelin are a part of history and so it will be interesting to watch.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 5:43 pm to HubbaBubba
I watched the director's cut and I liked it.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 5:46 pm to HubbaBubba
The director’s cut is excellent IMO.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 5:47 pm to HubbaBubba
I got the directors cut and watched it recently.
It remains a deeply flawed film, with not nearly enough back story or build up to Balian or his abilities, with the audience left to fill in that this guy, because he is a blacksmith, is experienced with warfare, even though there’s a scene with him learning how to fight for what appears to be the first time.
Pacing is a bit difficult, sometimes feeling too slow other times breezing through so much at once it causes whiplash.
But it’s pretty and fun and definitely worth a watch.
It remains a deeply flawed film, with not nearly enough back story or build up to Balian or his abilities, with the audience left to fill in that this guy, because he is a blacksmith, is experienced with warfare, even though there’s a scene with him learning how to fight for what appears to be the first time.
Pacing is a bit difficult, sometimes feeling too slow other times breezing through so much at once it causes whiplash.
But it’s pretty and fun and definitely worth a watch.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 5:57 pm to HubbaBubba
Another incorrect depiction of the Crusades. Depicting Christians as evil, backward invaders, and the Muslims as enlightened, friendly natives. A load of complete horseshite.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 6:09 pm to LoveThatMoney
quote:would have been a great movie if everything about Bailan was different
It remains a deeply flawed film, with not nearly enough back story or build up to Balian or his abilities, with the audience left to fill in that this guy, because he is a blacksmith, is experienced with warfare, even though there’s a scene with him learning how to fight for what appears to be the first time.
if nothing else, it's a pleasure to look at

Posted on 8/12/26 at 6:14 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
Wonderful visuals and some wonderful acting, Irons, Gleeson, Norton, Neeson specifically but paints Saladin and the muslims as great people. Guy was a terrible King in real life but from most accounts a decent person.
Obviously Eva Green, hot.
Obviously Eva Green, hot.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 6:21 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
He’s an audience POV type character who should’ve had some scenes cut. Sicario was brought up on the board in the last day or so, Kate is that type of character only there’s no bloat with her scenes and the movie was better for it.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 6:22 pm to Shiftyplus1
quote:
Another incorrect depiction of the Crusades. Depicting Christians as evil, backward invaders, and the Muslims as enlightened, friendly natives. A load of complete horseshite.
Did you watch the whole movie?
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:01 pm to Madking
quote:
He’s an audience POV type character who should’ve had some scenes cut. Sicario was brought up on the board in the last day or so, Kate is that type of character only there’s no bloat with her scenes and the movie was better for it.
Kate was also notably out of her depths and didn’t know what the frick was going on.
Balian ran the damn war.
ETA: I actually looked up on ChatGPT why Balian was such a Mary Sue or whatever that term is.
Basically, it said that a lot of the explanation was unsaid and is mostly that he was “noticeably smarter than other characters“ so he apparently could learn warfare quickly, he had prior experience as a siege engineer in a different war, which apparently is more tactical than most modern audiences appreciate, and as a blacksmith, he actually would have been much more experienced in warfare than almost anyone else, despite the fact that they do not explain that in the movie.
All of that sounded like a bunch of hogwash to me.
This post was edited on 8/12/26 at 7:10 pm
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:28 pm to HubbaBubba
It is a great movie. One of my favorites. 
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:46 pm to Bayou Warrior 64
Great movie but would’ve loved another 30 minutes or so dedicated to their trek through the european forests with the snow. Ridley just absolutely nailed that scenery along with the opening scene of Gladiator.
The Viking was badass.
Also, ol Jamie Lannister is the sheriff that comes after them initially. Never realized it until a couple years ago
2000-2010 was really a great run of movies. Everything from Gladiator to The Prestige to No Country for Old Men. With some Apocalypto, Kingdom of Heaven, etc. thrown in.
The Viking was badass.
Also, ol Jamie Lannister is the sheriff that comes after them initially. Never realized it until a couple years ago
2000-2010 was really a great run of movies. Everything from Gladiator to The Prestige to No Country for Old Men. With some Apocalypto, Kingdom of Heaven, etc. thrown in.
This post was edited on 8/12/26 at 7:48 pm
Posted on 8/13/26 at 8:38 am to LoveThatMoney
After watching last night I was glad that I moved to the media room and watched on the big screen. Beautiful but gritty look at the panoramic landscape. Lots of holes left unfilled in the story that could have been much better. Balian's character was very shallowly played by Orlando Bloom. No lead up to his character, his personal loss of his wife could have been the built up with some backstory scenes of them together to create some emotional connection to the character with the viewing audience. Liam Nelson chews up his character in his usual gruff Liam Neeson style as the father, Godfrey. Jeremy Irons was completely underused as Tiberius. Some of the scenes were amazing and while I streamed it last night, I plan to order the movie and watch in again but in 4K Blu-Ray for the full effect. Some of the fight scenes and the vision of Jerusalem were amazing.
I can't imagine how bad it was with 45 minutes cut out for the theatrical release. I barely understood the storyline sequencing leading up to the historical sacking of Jerusalem and how Balian went from being a blacksmith to a wartime leader with amazing swordsmanship. Guess he spent time in a pirate ship before he becomes a blacksmith?
I can't imagine how bad it was with 45 minutes cut out for the theatrical release. I barely understood the storyline sequencing leading up to the historical sacking of Jerusalem and how Balian went from being a blacksmith to a wartime leader with amazing swordsmanship. Guess he spent time in a pirate ship before he becomes a blacksmith?
Posted on 8/13/26 at 9:59 am to HubbaBubba
Bought the Director's cut and love it. Find myself watching this movie once a year 
Posted on 8/13/26 at 10:14 am to Shiftyplus1
quote:
Another incorrect depiction of the Crusades. Depicting Christians as evil, backward invaders, and the Muslims as enlightened, friendly natives. A load of complete horseshite.
The Crusaders were evil, backwards invaders. Many of them destroyed attacked European towns and cities on their way to the Levant. The Muslims were also evil, backwards invaders. The fight over the Holy Land wasn't about religion; It was about empire.
Posted on 8/13/26 at 11:00 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
can't imagine how bad it was with 45 minutes cut out for the theatrical release. I barely understood the storyline sequencing leading up to the historical sacking of Jerusalem and how Balian went from being a blacksmith to a wartime leader with amazing swordsmanship. Guess he spent time in a pirate ship before he becomes a blacksmith?
It was fricking awful.
My screening also had someone’s fricking hair over the projector in the top right corner the whole time, which was deeply distracting.
When people on here said it was great, I laughed at them.
The Director’s Cut is much, much better, and even it I wouldn’t call “great.” But it’s enjoyable.
Posted on 8/13/26 at 11:01 am to Deadmanshand
quote:
quote:
Another incorrect depiction of the Crusades. Depicting Christians as evil, backward invaders, and the Muslims as enlightened, friendly natives. A load of complete horseshite.
The Crusaders were evil, backwards invaders

Posted on 8/13/26 at 3:33 pm to 3nOut
And you sound like a moron who knows nothing about history.
Posted on 8/13/26 at 3:40 pm to Deadmanshand
quote:
And you sound like a moron who knows nothing about history.
The history that made the Crusaders the bad guys?
I know about it I just think it’s factually incorrect and ignoring the entirety Islam’s behavior since then.
I won’t pretend that Christianity through most of the first millennium post AD isn’t filled with flaws and failures of unchristian behavior but it’s still
Leaps and bounds better than what most of the Muslim world did in that time.

Popular
Back to top


9














