Started By
Message

Kingdom of Heaven

Posted on 8/12/26 at 5:37 pm
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
53259 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 5:37 pm
I started watching the director's (Ridley Scott) cut of Kingdom of Heaven last night, a movie which I'd never experienced. I started watching in my small 'getaway from everyone else' spot in the house and got 20 minutes in and decided this deserves watching on a bigger screen and much better sound system.

I think I'm in for a visual treat. Hope it's not disappointing but I've enjoyed many Ridley Scott movies. Blade Runner being my favorite, which did poorly at the box office but which went on to become a cult classic and define modern science fiction. So I'm thinking it might be good. Certainly the tales of Baelin are a part of history and so it will be interesting to watch.
Posted by coolpapaboze
Parts Unknown
Member since Dec 2006
22668 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 5:43 pm to
I watched the director's cut and I liked it.
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
110324 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 5:46 pm to
The director’s cut is excellent IMO.
Posted by LoveThatMoney
Who knows where?
Member since Jan 2008
12916 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 5:47 pm to
I got the directors cut and watched it recently.

It remains a deeply flawed film, with not nearly enough back story or build up to Balian or his abilities, with the audience left to fill in that this guy, because he is a blacksmith, is experienced with warfare, even though there’s a scene with him learning how to fight for what appears to be the first time.

Pacing is a bit difficult, sometimes feeling too slow other times breezing through so much at once it causes whiplash.

But it’s pretty and fun and definitely worth a watch.
Posted by Shiftyplus1
Marathon, FL
Member since Oct 2005
14917 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 5:57 pm to
Another incorrect depiction of the Crusades. Depicting Christians as evil, backward invaders, and the Muslims as enlightened, friendly natives. A load of complete horseshite.
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
62644 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 6:09 pm to
quote:

It remains a deeply flawed film, with not nearly enough back story or build up to Balian or his abilities, with the audience left to fill in that this guy, because he is a blacksmith, is experienced with warfare, even though there’s a scene with him learning how to fight for what appears to be the first time.

would have been a great movie if everything about Bailan was different

if nothing else, it's a pleasure to look at





Posted by Cleathecat
Houston
Member since Feb 2021
2231 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 6:14 pm to
Wonderful visuals and some wonderful acting, Irons, Gleeson, Norton, Neeson specifically but paints Saladin and the muslims as great people. Guy was a terrible King in real life but from most accounts a decent person.

Obviously Eva Green, hot.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
76349 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 6:21 pm to
He’s an audience POV type character who should’ve had some scenes cut. Sicario was brought up on the board in the last day or so, Kate is that type of character only there’s no bloat with her scenes and the movie was better for it.
Posted by PowerTool
The dark side of the road
Member since Dec 2009
23636 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

Another incorrect depiction of the Crusades. Depicting Christians as evil, backward invaders, and the Muslims as enlightened, friendly natives. A load of complete horseshite.



Did you watch the whole movie?
Posted by LoveThatMoney
Who knows where?
Member since Jan 2008
12916 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

He’s an audience POV type character who should’ve had some scenes cut. Sicario was brought up on the board in the last day or so, Kate is that type of character only there’s no bloat with her scenes and the movie was better for it.


Kate was also notably out of her depths and didn’t know what the frick was going on.

Balian ran the damn war.

ETA: I actually looked up on ChatGPT why Balian was such a Mary Sue or whatever that term is.

Basically, it said that a lot of the explanation was unsaid and is mostly that he was “noticeably smarter than other characters“ so he apparently could learn warfare quickly, he had prior experience as a siege engineer in a different war, which apparently is more tactical than most modern audiences appreciate, and as a blacksmith, he actually would have been much more experienced in warfare than almost anyone else, despite the fact that they do not explain that in the movie.

All of that sounded like a bunch of hogwash to me.
This post was edited on 8/12/26 at 7:10 pm
Posted by Bayou Warrior 64
Member since Feb 2021
1345 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:28 pm to
It is a great movie. One of my favorites.
Posted by UnluckyTiger
Member since Sep 2003
44657 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:46 pm to
Great movie but would’ve loved another 30 minutes or so dedicated to their trek through the european forests with the snow. Ridley just absolutely nailed that scenery along with the opening scene of Gladiator.



The Viking was badass.

Also, ol Jamie Lannister is the sheriff that comes after them initially. Never realized it until a couple years ago

2000-2010 was really a great run of movies. Everything from Gladiator to The Prestige to No Country for Old Men. With some Apocalypto, Kingdom of Heaven, etc. thrown in.
This post was edited on 8/12/26 at 7:48 pm
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
53259 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 8:38 am to
After watching last night I was glad that I moved to the media room and watched on the big screen. Beautiful but gritty look at the panoramic landscape. Lots of holes left unfilled in the story that could have been much better. Balian's character was very shallowly played by Orlando Bloom. No lead up to his character, his personal loss of his wife could have been the built up with some backstory scenes of them together to create some emotional connection to the character with the viewing audience. Liam Nelson chews up his character in his usual gruff Liam Neeson style as the father, Godfrey. Jeremy Irons was completely underused as Tiberius. Some of the scenes were amazing and while I streamed it last night, I plan to order the movie and watch in again but in 4K Blu-Ray for the full effect. Some of the fight scenes and the vision of Jerusalem were amazing.

I can't imagine how bad it was with 45 minutes cut out for the theatrical release. I barely understood the storyline sequencing leading up to the historical sacking of Jerusalem and how Balian went from being a blacksmith to a wartime leader with amazing swordsmanship. Guess he spent time in a pirate ship before he becomes a blacksmith?
Posted by Captain Crown
Member since Jun 2011
57692 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 9:59 am to
Bought the Director's cut and love it. Find myself watching this movie once a year
Posted by Deadmanshand
Member since Jun 2026
767 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 10:14 am to
quote:

Another incorrect depiction of the Crusades. Depicting Christians as evil, backward invaders, and the Muslims as enlightened, friendly natives. A load of complete horseshite.


The Crusaders were evil, backwards invaders. Many of them destroyed attacked European towns and cities on their way to the Levant. The Muslims were also evil, backwards invaders. The fight over the Holy Land wasn't about religion; It was about empire.
Posted by LoveThatMoney
Who knows where?
Member since Jan 2008
12916 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 11:00 am to
quote:

can't imagine how bad it was with 45 minutes cut out for the theatrical release. I barely understood the storyline sequencing leading up to the historical sacking of Jerusalem and how Balian went from being a blacksmith to a wartime leader with amazing swordsmanship. Guess he spent time in a pirate ship before he becomes a blacksmith?


It was fricking awful.

My screening also had someone’s fricking hair over the projector in the top right corner the whole time, which was deeply distracting.

When people on here said it was great, I laughed at them.

The Director’s Cut is much, much better, and even it I wouldn’t call “great.” But it’s enjoyable.
Posted by 3nOut
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Jan 2013
32992 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 11:01 am to
quote:


quote:
Another incorrect depiction of the Crusades. Depicting Christians as evil, backward invaders, and the Muslims as enlightened, friendly natives. A load of complete horseshite.


The Crusaders were evil, backwards invaders


Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
20912 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 11:24 am to
This movie is awesome
Posted by Deadmanshand
Member since Jun 2026
767 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 3:33 pm to
And you sound like a moron who knows nothing about history.
Posted by 3nOut
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Jan 2013
32992 posts
Posted on 8/13/26 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

And you sound like a moron who knows nothing about history.


The history that made the Crusaders the bad guys?

I know about it I just think it’s factually incorrect and ignoring the entirety Islam’s behavior since then.

I won’t pretend that Christianity through most of the first millennium post AD isn’t filled with flaws and failures of unchristian behavior but it’s still
Leaps and bounds better than what most of the Muslim world did in that time.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram