Started By
Message

re: Is The Passion of the Christ one of the most violent films to have come out this century?

Posted on 4/6/26 at 7:11 pm to
Posted by nealnan8
Atlanta
Member since Oct 2016
4743 posts
Posted on 4/6/26 at 7:11 pm to
I just finished watching 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple. This is the most graphically violent film of the last 25 years.
Posted by UFFan
Planet earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Member since Aug 2016
3090 posts
Posted on 4/6/26 at 7:19 pm to
Some of it is that Jim Cavieze, the actor playing Jesus, really did repeatedly get injured during the film, and his actual pain is visible during the movie. He experienced some unintentional, albeit not completely unforseeable, injuries such as dislocating his shoulder while carrying the cross, and getting stricken twice by the whip during the whipping scene. He also experienced a less forseeable injury, which is that he literally got struck by lightning during the Sermon on the Mount scene.

He had to have 2 open heart surgeries to fix his injuries from the movie.
This post was edited on 4/6/26 at 7:21 pm
Posted by 3nOut
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Jan 2013
32407 posts
Posted on 4/6/26 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

he still holds ultimate blame.



Does not compute with

quote:

But Pilate offered to spare Jesus. A crowd of angry Jews (pushed by rabbis) told Pilate to crucify him.


Not a Jew Hater. Not a Pilate Hater. Those are incongruous statements.
Posted by FriedPork
Member since Nov 2025
32 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 6:24 am to
This isn't controversial. The Jews killed Jesus. The Romans are the instrument they used to do so.
And Jesus submitted to God's plan.
Don't hate
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65900 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 7:51 am to
quote:

And Jesus submitted to God's plan.
Don't hate


Yes, Jesus submitted to His own plan.
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
35404 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

Since its release, I have yet to see a major motion picture that depicts the murder of someone in such a brutal, realistic, and visceral way.


Robocop.

Which, ironically (or maybe not), was meant to be seen as a take on an "American Jesus."
Posted by Dam Guide
Member since Sep 2005
16741 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 3:54 pm to
What? no

quote:

I have yet to see a major motion picture that depicts the murder of someone in such a brutal, realistic, and visceral way.


Well, you didn't see it with this one either. It wasn't a murder; it was a state-sanctioned execution.
Posted by JasonDBlaha
Woodlands, Texas
Member since Apr 2023
4629 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

It wasn't a murder; it was a state-sanctioned execution.


Technically it was a state-sanctioned murder
Posted by Philzilla2k
Member since Oct 2017
12763 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 6:56 pm to
quote:

Technically it was a state-sanctioned murder

It wasn’t murder, that’s a Lucan conceit.
The charge was placed above his head.
quote:

Iesus Nazarenus, Rex Iudaeorum

Seems pretty clear.
Posted by JasonDBlaha
Woodlands, Texas
Member since Apr 2023
4629 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 7:33 pm to
Well technically the Roman who stabbed Jesus in the midsection would have been the murderer
Posted by JasonDBlaha
Woodlands, Texas
Member since Apr 2023
4629 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 7:36 pm to
quote:

I just finished watching 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple. This is the most graphically violent film of the last 25 years.


28 years later bone temple was tame compared to this film. All of the violence was over-the-top
Posted by Dam Guide
Member since Sep 2005
16741 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

Well technically the Roman who stabbed Jesus in the midsection would have been the murderer


That was to verify death, not murder him. State executed him.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
63842 posts
Posted on 4/8/26 at 5:25 am to
quote:

Technically it was a state-sanctioned murder


Uh, no.
Posted by wryder1
Birmingham
Member since Feb 2008
4941 posts
Posted on 4/8/26 at 7:13 am to
quote:

From the perspective of someone who isn’t a Christian, it could easily be seen as a 2 hour snuff film devoted to depicting someone being tortured to death.


Mel Gibson was capturing, the best he could, the full nature of Jesus’s’ death. He was tortured far worse than we can imagine, to the point that he was unrecognizable while hanging on the cross. He was also hung naked, to shame Him, but that was not shown for obvious reasons. This was not even remotely close to a snuff film but rather to allow Christian’s and no Christian’s to get a full understand of the horrific death that Jesus suffered for Christian’s and non-Christian’s alike. He knew the death that awaited Him which is why he sweated blood while praying for God to remove that cup from Him, but in the end said Gods will be done.

He loved us all that much and the only time He ever cried out was when God turned His face from Him, which is when He said “God my God, why have you forsaken me?”. That was more unbearable for Him than the torture he received to His physical body.
Posted by BabysArmHoldingApple
Lafayette
Member since Dec 2016
1352 posts
Posted on 4/8/26 at 7:37 am to
quote:

Lucan


Assume that you are you referring to the 20-year-old man who spent the first 10 years of his life running wild in the forests of northern Minnesota, after being raised by wolves, and is taken to a research institute and taught the ways of human society.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram