Started By
Message

re: Is Christmas Story the worst Christmas movie?

Posted on 12/23/24 at 10:55 am to
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60871 posts
Posted on 12/23/24 at 10:55 am to
quote:

So boomers were in their 30s when it came out, i.e., targeting boomer nostalgia.


Except it’s not set in the 50s so not boomers. It was also a flop when it was released in 83. It became a “classic” when TBS started the 24 Hour marathon in the late 90s. Because that has continued for over quarter of a century and counting it’s grossly over played and it has become the hipster view to shite on it. It’s a top 10 maybe top 5 Christmas movie (depending on how we want to define “Christmas movie”. I’ll be at Sonic later
Posted by wesfau
Member since Mar 2023
1898 posts
Posted on 12/23/24 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Except it’s not set in the 50s


wut?
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60871 posts
Posted on 12/23/24 at 10:59 am to
quote:

Except it’s not set in the 50s wut?


It’s set in 1939, that’s 11 years before the 50s

Posted by wesfau
Member since Mar 2023
1898 posts
Posted on 12/23/24 at 11:04 am to
quote:

It’s set in 1939, that’s 11 years before the 50


Huh. You learn something every day.

Posted by OlGrandad
Member since Oct 2009
4372 posts
Posted on 12/23/24 at 11:09 am to
Posted by PJinAtl
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2007
14063 posts
Posted on 12/23/24 at 11:20 am to
quote:

You learn something every day.

They never actually say a year but you can narrow it down pretty well. It is post August 1939 given the Wizard of Oz characters (movie was released August of '39).

Little Orphan Annie radio show ran from April 1931 to April 1942.

Given those facts it has to be 1939, 1940, or 1941.

Since there is no mention of Pearl Harbor that rules out 1941. 1939 makes the most sense because the Oz characters would be just a few months from the big screen release.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39839 posts
Posted on 12/23/24 at 11:25 am to
There is a calendar you can see in the movie at one point that says 1939 on it.

The decoder pin says 1940 on it. However, seeing as it was almost the new year, very possible they just alread started making the 1940 versions.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
63416 posts
Posted on 12/23/24 at 11:39 am to
quote:

1939
No, apparently, the director intentionally made it ambiguous. The culture being depicted is very late 40's/50's though.

Either way, not my bag.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
175997 posts
Posted on 12/23/24 at 11:48 am to
quote:

No, apparently, the director intentionally made it ambiguous. The culture being depicted is very late 40's/50's though.

You think they would have Wizard of Oz characters in the store in the 1950s?

And it’s not close to the worst Christmas movie. That award goes to The Polar Express.
This post was edited on 12/23/24 at 11:49 am
Posted by CollegeFBRules
Member since Oct 2008
25396 posts
Posted on 12/23/24 at 11:48 am to
Fah rah rah rah rah, you roser.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60871 posts
Posted on 12/23/24 at 11:50 am to
quote:

The culture being depicted is very late 40's/50's though.


No it’s not, the culture is definitely pre WWII late 30s/1940.

As someone mentioned Little Orphan Annie ended in 1942 also there’s no mention of WWII, if it was 50s “army men” would be a prominent toy also TV existed by the mid 50s more than half of households had a TV and there is zero mention of that.
This post was edited on 12/23/24 at 11:51 am
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
63416 posts
Posted on 12/23/24 at 12:44 pm to
Well, they definitely don't look like they just got out of the depression.

Take the win, I guess. This movie does suck though. No lies there.
Posted by LSUGUMBO
Shreveport, LA
Member since Sep 2005
9548 posts
Posted on 12/23/24 at 12:51 pm to
It only took 4 hours to reach 100 Downvotes
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60871 posts
Posted on 12/23/24 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

Well, they definitely don't look like they just got out of the depression.


Not everyone had the Grapes of Wrath experience fwiw,

quote:

This movie does suck though. No lies there.






Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39839 posts
Posted on 12/23/24 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

Well, they definitely don't look like they just got out of the depression.


I mean, they weren't in the dust bowl region of the country. By 1939, most of life in the country had largely gotten back to normal, especially in the more urban areas.
Posted by shutterspeed
MS Gulf Coast
Member since May 2007
70892 posts
Posted on 12/23/24 at 1:14 pm to
This thread may be the single largest collection of hot takes ever.
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
162153 posts
Posted on 12/23/24 at 1:23 pm to
I think now there’s just an anti 24 hours of a Christmas story crowd, I say it every time, that movie does the best job of capturing exactly what it’s like to be a kid at Christmas time and wanting that one gift
Posted by themetalreb
Mississippi
Member since Sep 2018
6775 posts
Posted on 12/23/24 at 1:33 pm to
Just when I think tRant can’t get any lower, someone attacks A Christmas Story…
Posted by Aeolian Vocalion
Texas
Member since Jul 2022
460 posts
Posted on 12/23/24 at 1:50 pm to
The period depicted always seemed pretty loosey-goosey to me. Coming from the comic-strip character, the Red Ryder BB-guns came out in 1940, along with the movie serial, shortly following the radio-series debut. But the rifle and the character became even more omnipresent in the mid-to-late-1940s, with advertisements and displays, along with the Republic film series (1944-47), which was hugely popular.

But then, you had the "Little Orphan Annie" radio thing, and that was a hotter item in the early-to-mid-1930s. By the late-30s/early-40s, "Captain Midnight" was the far bigger thing. Annie and Daddy Warbucks were on the relative wane as early as 1940, even if remaining constant presences in newspapers for decades to come.

Didn't really seem to jibe, putting Red Ryder and Little Orphan Annie together, the first a kiddie icon of the 1940s, the latter of the 1930s. Conceivable that they were trying to most evoke maybe 1940 or 1941... yet it otherwise seemed moored a bit more in the later 1940s. Especially the sort of smart-alecky, world-weary cynicism of the whole endeavor, which reeked vastly more of a post-war mentality In fact, that's why it actually feels a bit more boomer-ish overall, even if depicting a pre-boomer era.

Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 12/23/24 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

Well, they definitely don't look like they just got out of the depression.


Yeah, this makes me a bit suspicious that it’s actually in 1939. You’d think there would be at least some talk about the war even if the US hadn’t entered it yet.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram