Started By
Message
locked post

Hangover 3!!

Posted on 5/26/13 at 12:54 am
Posted by jdog24116
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2010
413 posts
Posted on 5/26/13 at 12:54 am
I loved it. Funny throughout. Any other reviews???
Critics didn't like it. Don't understand that.
Posted by Cap Crunch
Fire Alleva
Member since Dec 2010
54189 posts
Posted on 5/26/13 at 12:55 am to
Was it the same exact plot as the 1st two movies?
Posted by BaddestAndvari
That Overweight Racist State
Member since Mar 2011
18281 posts
Posted on 5/26/13 at 1:01 am to
quote:

Critics didn't like it. Don't understand that.


you really don't understand why a 3rd movie in a series with almost no plot line is getting bad reviews from critics?!?! Do you even know who the critics are?!

I'm not saying it's a bad movie, but bad reviews for this film are to be expected
Posted by SouljaBreauxTellEm
Mizz
Member since Aug 2009
29343 posts
Posted on 5/26/13 at 1:01 am to
i loved one.

hated two.

so since you loved this one so much, can you tell me how you felt about 2?
Posted by TigerMan327
Elsewhere
Member since Feb 2011
5135 posts
Posted on 5/26/13 at 1:04 am to
I liked both one and two. yeah they had the same plot but the shite was still hilarious.

I went and saw 3 the other day and the plot was completely different and it wasn't nearly as funny as the others.. The Movie was based mostly on chow and they made alan almost a different character it seemed.

all in all I still liked it but wasn't as funny as the others
This post was edited on 5/26/13 at 1:05 am
Posted by SouljaBreauxTellEm
Mizz
Member since Aug 2009
29343 posts
Posted on 5/26/13 at 1:07 am to
well crap if it wasn't as good as 2 then i'll pass and wait on this
Posted by ehidal1
Chief Boot Knocka
Member since Dec 2007
37133 posts
Posted on 5/26/13 at 1:08 am to
2 sucked balls and 1 was meh at best. I have no faith in 3.
Posted by Atari
Texas
Member since Dec 2009
3716 posts
Posted on 5/26/13 at 2:19 am to
Just got back from seeing it. 1 was decent, 2 felt like a rehash with no new material, and this one just feels like they tried to learn from 2 and changed it up a bit, but it's not any better for it.
Posted by harmonics
Mars Hotel
Member since Jan 2010
18614 posts
Posted on 5/26/13 at 2:48 am to
Throw me in the minority/majority of people that thought Hangover 1 was mildly funny and absolutely didn't warrant a fricking trilogy.
Posted by Dylan
Bayou Barbary
Member since May 2009
3406 posts
Posted on 5/26/13 at 3:13 am to
I liked both the first and second, but absolutely hated the third. Don't waste your time. First off the majority of the really funny parts were on the previews or trailers and they made Allen a completely different person basically.
Posted by TheGreatInquisition
Member since May 2013
159 posts
Posted on 5/26/13 at 3:32 am to
Just wait until the sequel.
Posted by CP3LSU25
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2009
51150 posts
Posted on 5/26/13 at 6:21 am to
It was about the same as the second but maybe a little better. Chow is great in some doses but not the whole movie. They had funny parts but it wasn't a good movie by any means. I liked how they tied a lot together from the first movie.
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 5/26/13 at 6:57 am to
quote:

Throw me in the minority/majority of people that thought Hangover 1 was mildly funny and absolutely didn't warrant a fricking trilogy.

Posted by dallastiger55
Jennings, LA
Member since Jan 2010
27655 posts
Posted on 5/26/13 at 7:02 am to
everyone i know that saw it said it was the same as 2 as far as laughs.


heard it was awful
Posted by LSUtiger17
New Orleans
Member since Mar 2009
3081 posts
Posted on 5/26/13 at 7:23 am to
I thought it was terrible. I loved 1, and hated 2 because it was a less funny remake of 1. This one was just awful with no funny scenes.
Posted by CP3LSU25
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2009
51150 posts
Posted on 5/26/13 at 7:28 am to
quote:

quote: Throw me in the minority/majority of people that thought Hangover 1 was mildly funny and absolutely didn't warrant a fricking trilogy.


Now if you didn't think the first one was funny than you have a problem and need to get that stick out of your arse
Posted by CyrustheVirus
Member since Jan 2013
2870 posts
Posted on 5/26/13 at 8:06 am to
quote:

well crap if it wasn't as good as 2 then i'll pass and wait on this


This.
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76170 posts
Posted on 5/26/13 at 8:25 am to
I'm with you. Hangover 1 was the most overrated comedy ever. 2 bored me. 3 doesn't interest me
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108098 posts
Posted on 5/26/13 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Throw me in the minority/majority of people that thought Hangover 1 was mildly funny and absolutely didn't warrant a fricking trilogy.


The reason it didn't warrant a trilogy is because the premise is so outlandish that nothing could happen like that again, and any sane person would avoid Allen again at all costs. I don't understand why they didn't beat him to a bloody pulp in the first one and then leave him for dead in the second.
This post was edited on 5/26/13 at 8:32 am
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
43462 posts
Posted on 5/26/13 at 9:00 am to
the zack gafunkass dude ruins the movies, especially 2. not only that but how could you frick up a movie about a bachelor party in fricking bangkok.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram