- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ghostbusters - Rotten Tomatometer 73%
Posted on 7/11/16 at 1:15 pm to Fewer Kilometers
Posted on 7/11/16 at 1:15 pm to Fewer Kilometers
I don't know anything about you other than you like batman v. Superman so it's not a stretch to imagine that if someone slaps a logo on a box that you'll probably eat it up 
1
Posted on 7/11/16 at 1:32 pm to DelU249
I'm interested to see where it will end up on IMDb. It's currently at a 3.5, although I'm betting many of those people haven't seen it.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 1:46 pm to ohiovol
quote:
I'm interested to see where it will end up on IMDb. It's currently at a 3.5, although I'm betting many of those people haven't seen it.
‘Ghostbusters’ Haters Are Spamming IMDb With Low Ratings
Posted on 7/11/16 at 1:48 pm to Fewer Kilometers
I'm not interested in the reviews though to see roeper to give something THAT bad of a review raises an eyebrow, but I don't make my decisions on roeper. The only reason I'm not going to see it is because I don't know a fricking thing about it. I've seen 1 1/2 tv spots.
What was interesting was the director's response to criticisms that I don't think are unreasonable. It was just internet chatter and now it's a thing. Most interesting is that Sony seemingly hasn't really put a lot of dollars into marketing. Is it because it sucks or because of expected backlash?
What was interesting was the director's response to criticisms that I don't think are unreasonable. It was just internet chatter and now it's a thing. Most interesting is that Sony seemingly hasn't really put a lot of dollars into marketing. Is it because it sucks or because of expected backlash?
This post was edited on 7/11/16 at 1:50 pm
Posted on 7/11/16 at 1:48 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:I've voted for the Republican candidate in every election since we ran Carter out of office.
You've certainly been acting like it [liberal puss] in this thread.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 2:19 pm to DanMullins4Life
Posted on 7/11/16 at 2:57 pm to DanMullins4Life
Definitely legit.
Gostbusters > Interstellar
Posted on 7/11/16 at 3:07 pm to Fewer Kilometers
quote:
I'm interested to see where it will end up on IMDb. It's currently at a 3.5, although I'm betting many of those people haven't seen it.
I'm glad that 1,564 people giving it a 1 rating are getting called out.
I'm disappointed that the 523 people giving it a 10 rating are being glossed over.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 3:12 pm to UMRealist
We should go through RT and find all the great movies that aren't rated as good as this movie.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 3:34 pm to DelU249
what channels do you watch that you havent seen any ads?
during the NBA playoffs there was one in damn near every other commercial break.
during the NBA playoffs there was one in damn near every other commercial break.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 3:42 pm to DelU249
quote:
Most interesting is that Sony seemingly hasn't really put a lot of dollars into marketing. Is it because it sucks or because of expected backlash?
Unless I am missing something, I feel like they have advertised the shite out of this movie. There were tons of commercials during the NBA playoffs. Although, it's weird how many commercials are about the movie, but use various celebrities to be Ghostbusters instead of using the actors from the movie.
ETA: Somehow I missed the post above me.
This post was edited on 7/11/16 at 3:45 pm
Posted on 7/11/16 at 3:50 pm to Dr RC
Don't watch the nba. I saw an ad on bravo and one on fox
Posted on 7/11/16 at 4:33 pm to DelU249
I've come to the conclusion:
If you've ever use the phrase "SJW", it's a pretty safe bet you're an a-hole.
If you use the phrases "alpha" or "beta" and you're not referring to the Greek alphabet, it means you can't get laid.
If you've ever use the phrase "SJW", it's a pretty safe bet you're an a-hole.
If you use the phrases "alpha" or "beta" and you're not referring to the Greek alphabet, it means you can't get laid.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 4:35 pm to timbo
Disagree with the first, agree with the second
SJW is precise whereas dipshit can describe so many things
SJW is precise whereas dipshit can describe so many things
Posted on 7/11/16 at 4:41 pm to Fewer Kilometers
quote:
‘Ghostbusters’ Haters Are Spamming IMDb With Low Ratings
Again, like any "online" poll or service...I fully expect the extremes of both sides to spam the hell out of the ballot box.
nothing to see here.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 10:00 pm to timbo
quote:
If you've ever use the phrase "SJW", it's a pretty safe bet you're an a-hole.
This is wrong.
Before "SJW" went mainstream, it referred to a very specific type of person who behaved in a very specific manner.
Posted on 7/11/16 at 10:06 pm to RuLSU
quote:
If you decide to see Ghostbusters this weekend, go in knowing that there’s even more where that came from. When Collider’s own Steve Weintraub sat down with the film’s director Paul Feig for the Ghostbusters press day, the filmmaker revealed that he already has an extended cut of the movie locked and loaded for home video release. Now this doesn’t sound like it’s a director’s cut per se, just a longer cut of the movie, but it does include a significant amount of new footage mined from a very long version of the movie that existed in its early stages:
“The editor’s first cut was 4 hours and 15 minutes, and I trimmed that down to a slim 3 and a half hours (laughs). We generate a lot of stuff and I always wanna have all the underpinnings of a big, emotional story, and because of that it just added a lot of extra scenes that as you’re going through, you know you have to make a lot of choices because I knew I had to bring this down under two hours. You just start weeding and saying, ‘What do people want to delve deeper into and what do we wanna just kind of skirt through and get to the fun parts?’”[
Posted on 7/11/16 at 10:24 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
“The editor’s first cut was 4 hours and 15 minutes, and I trimmed that down to a slim 3 and a half hours (laughs). We generate a lot of stuff and I always wanna have all the underpinnings of a big, emotional story, and because of that it just added a lot of extra scenes that as you’re going through, you know you have to make a lot of choices because I knew I had to bring this down under two hours. You just start weeding and saying, ‘What do people want to delve deeper into and what do we wanna just kind of skirt through and get to the fun parts?’”[
holy hell....4 hours and 15 minutes?!
sounds like they initially plugged every lame joke they could
Posted on 7/11/16 at 10:36 pm to HailToTheChiz
The IMDB troll wars aren't as bad as I thought. Compared to TFA, it's actually pretty tame.
Page 8 of 20
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News