- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/13/16 at 10:39 am to RollTide1987
What if the roles were swapped this would be like remaking sisterhood of the traveling pants to an all male cast and making the female side characters act like they are all on their periods. I'm sure if this was the case it would be ok to bash the film.
Posted on 7/13/16 at 2:48 pm to GingerMerkin
quote:
What if the roles were swapped this would be like remaking sisterhood of the traveling pants to an all male cast and making the female side characters act like they are all on their periods. I'm sure if this was the case it would be ok to bash the film.
How old are you?
Posted on 7/13/16 at 4:59 pm to Fewer Kilometers
Old enough to downvote, clearly.
Posted on 7/13/16 at 7:14 pm to RuLSU
Supposedly the movies been banned in China. Not good for the international box office.
Posted on 7/13/16 at 7:20 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
Supposedly the movies been banned in China.
They really need to get over their supernatural ban; especially when supernatural equals Stay-Puff Marshmellow man.
Posted on 7/14/16 at 10:55 am to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
They didn't ban it over supernatural issues, they banned because they didn't think it would appeal to movie-goers in China.
Posted on 7/14/16 at 11:19 am to TigerintheNO
quote:
they banned because they didn't think it would appeal to movie-goers in China.
Wait, what?
Posted on 7/14/16 at 11:22 am to TigerintheNO
quote:
They didn't ban it over supernatural issues,
I'm sure they did.
Posted on 7/14/16 at 11:42 am to GingerMerkin
quote:I know I would.
What if the roles were swapped this would be like remaking sisterhood of the traveling pants to an all male cast and making the female side characters act like they are all on their periods. I'm sure if this was the case it would be ok to bash the film.
Posted on 7/14/16 at 12:02 pm to RLDSC FAN
They could have prevented all this backlash and internet uproar by just linking it to the original.
Should have made it to where the women were all children of the original 4, and had been friends their whole life because of their dads. When Egon passes away, his daughter (Kristin Wiig) either accidentally releases a bunch of ghosts, or one particularly evil ghosts, and it's now up to her and her three friends to catch them and save the city.
With limited assistance from Peter, Ray, and Winston; the girls now have the knowledge and arsenal to capture the ghosts.
Everyone is happy because it honors the past film and makes sense as a new film.
Should have made it to where the women were all children of the original 4, and had been friends their whole life because of their dads. When Egon passes away, his daughter (Kristin Wiig) either accidentally releases a bunch of ghosts, or one particularly evil ghosts, and it's now up to her and her three friends to catch them and save the city.
With limited assistance from Peter, Ray, and Winston; the girls now have the knowledge and arsenal to capture the ghosts.
Everyone is happy because it honors the past film and makes sense as a new film.
Posted on 7/14/16 at 12:04 pm to LSUZombie
quote:
Should have made it to where the women were all children of the original 4, and had been friends their whole life because of their dads. When Egon passes away, his daughter (Kristin Wiig) either accidentally releases a bunch of ghosts, or one particularly evil ghosts, and it's now up to her and her three friends to catch them and save the city.
With limited assistance from Peter, Ray, and Winston; the girls now have the knowledge and arsenal to capture the ghosts.
Everyone is happy because it honors the past film and makes sense as a new film.
That's sounds awful.
Posted on 7/14/16 at 1:18 pm to RLDSC FAN
just saw the film is banned in china. big box office country to lose.
Posted on 7/14/16 at 5:14 pm to 1999
I Ain't Afraid of No Vagina Fart
quote:
The woman-driven cast of Ghostbusters smashes the glass ceiling with a small puff of wind
quote:6 of the 9 paragraphs have nothing to do with reviewing the movie
All those innocent men crying into their keyboards over the injustice of having to stand by and watch in horror as the reputation of their beloved childhood film is disgraced with not only a remake, but a remake featuring a headlining cast of all women, have finally been vindicated. Why? Because Ghostbusters 2016 goes too far.
A movie once so pure that the most horrific villain was still only as brutal as a large puffy marshmallow could be, has forever been tainted … by a vagina fart.
THE HORROR! Imagine the absolute disgust that unsuspecting men everywhere will feel when they hear what may be a queef! This is what they were warning us about all this time, through their army of anonymous Twitter eggs!
When did safe spaces for men become so undervalued? When did we, as a society, allow this to happen? And when will it end? Will there be more instances of rabid women wrapping their air-spurting labia around other unsuspecting childhood memories, strangling the rose-colored life out of them?
YUP, THERE SURE WILL BE, YOU PETULANT, WOMAN-HATING CRETINS. Because in all seriousness, Ghostbusters 2016 is every bit as good as Ghostbusters 1984, and the fact that it stars four women — the hilarious Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig, Leslie Jones and Kate McKinnon — is barely even worth discussing, let alone fretting over.
Erin Gilbert, Abby Yates, Jillian Holtzmann and Patty Tolan — this generation’s Peter Venkman, Ray Stantz, Egon Spengler and Winston Zeddemore — are also super-smart scientists and supernatural enthusiasts who band together to save New York City from an onslaught of spooky monsters that have been unleashed by a humanity-hating genius. These Ghostbusters don’t hate men, and they don’t shove feminism down your throat. These women are what every men's rights activist fears: normal human beings who do normal human things, like dance to pop songs, order takeout and invent badass nuclear weapons to defeat Class 5 full-roaming vapors.
Some comedic bits hang on a little too long, and the references to the original flick felt a little on-the-nose at times, but ultimately there are no crimes the original didn't also commit. In fact, Ghostbusters 2016’s final action scene truly benefits from advancements in special effects — watching the small cartoon ghost evolve into the final giant beast, the way Stay Puft did in 1984, was absolutely thrilling, thanks to modern animation.
And McKinnon — oh, McKinnon. To her, extra-special attention must be paid. Saying little more than a sentence at a time, the SNL cast member steals every scene with a nuanced comedic genius rarely seen (and rarely appreciated) in an industry drenched with slapstick and dick-jokes. Just as Bill Murray can deliver a punchline simply by ever-so-slightly tilting his head forward, McKinnon can shift her eyes, curl one corner of her mouth or mumble only two words to make a packed theater burst into thunderous laughter.
So are you one of the crybabies screaming about how wretched it is to see — blech — women fill the role of your childhood heroes? Well, did you know there’s a LEGO Ghostbusters movie, too? ARE YOU MAD THAT ANIMATED PLASTIC BUILDING BLOCKS ARE ALSO SHITTING ALL OVER YOUR PRECIOUS MEMORIES? NO, YOU ARE NOT. So sit down, shut up and enjoy the movie. Or stay home and be cranky about it. You’re missing out on a very entertaining 116 minutes. And a queef joke.
This post was edited on 7/14/16 at 5:15 pm
Posted on 7/14/16 at 5:58 pm to joeyb147
yeah, that effectively shows why talking about how bad the movie is would be a waste of time. the trailers look terrible but just don't see it if it looks as bad to you as it does to me.
Posted on 7/14/16 at 7:32 pm to TigerintheNO
quote:
They didn't ban it over supernatural issues, they banned because they didn't think it would appeal to movie-goers
Wish we could ban it for the same reason.
Posted on 7/14/16 at 11:50 pm to JumpingTheShark
Took my wife to see it tonight. It's a pretty bad film. There's definitely some very funny moments, mostly from Wiig, Mccarthy, and a surprisingly funny Hemsworth. But overall it's just not very good. Leslie Jones is awful.
Posted on 7/15/16 at 12:15 am to RLDSC FAN
Has anyone else ever hated a movie they have never watched more than this one? or am I alone? I usually like Kristen Wiig and I would be tempted to deck her in the schnoz still over the "honor these movies" comment.
Posted on 7/15/16 at 1:31 am to partywiththelombardi
Why do people hate it? I think it'll be awful and I almost certainly won't see it. It may be stupid, pointless, and insulting But hate is a strong word. There's too much else wrong with the world to actually hate this IMHO.
Posted on 7/15/16 at 3:54 am to athenslife101
quote:
Lh]Why do people hate it?
It doesn't pass the smell test. It's not organic.
This post was edited on 7/15/16 at 3:57 am
Popular
Back to top


0









