- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Director Admits Transformers 2 was crap
Posted on 3/7/11 at 4:44 pm to Baloo
Posted on 3/7/11 at 4:44 pm to Baloo
quote:
What definition of decent plot means "shitload of information"? Actually, that would be a BAD plot. And I'd argue Transformers has a fairly complicated backstory, which makes it hard to follow.
Random question but have you seen Inception? What did you think of it?
Transformers 2 really didn't have that complicated of a backstory. At least not to me. They broke it down pretty clearly and easily to me.
Posted on 3/7/11 at 4:46 pm to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
Brokeback Mountain made like $90 million
That's not even Domestic blockbusters status.
quote:
Heath Ledger was nominated for a Leading Actor Oscar for gods sake.
And? How many people do you think really care THAT MUCH about who merely gets nominated?
Posted on 3/7/11 at 4:48 pm to GamecockAlum
quote:
What animated movie?
Posted on 3/7/11 at 4:48 pm to GamecockAlum
quote:
I never said it was good just because it made a lot of money. I look at movies as entertainment not art. I should enjoy my entertainment and with that in mind, Transformers was enjoyable for me. I'm not going to try to convince you it was good if you already say you disliked it. If you enjoy it you enjoy it, if you don't you don't. Whatever works for you. I just hate people who go in expecting one thing (foolishly) and then come out saying it was horrible when it wasn't what they expected. Or they expect a certain movie to be their vision of a great film when it was never intended to be compared to that movie.
then why did you bring up its business? Of course you were attempting to use the movie's gate as an indication of its quality.
And considering I compared it to Crank and The Transformers animated movie, far superior action movies, its pretty clear the rest of your argument attacks an argument I didn't make. I didn't compare it to Citizen Kane.
And if this is your opinion, which is fine, I have two questions:
ONE: Why don't you like thinking? Or, more accurately, how is thinking not entertaining?
TWO: If you don't like analysis of films, what are you doing on message board devoted to analysis of films?
Posted on 3/7/11 at 4:48 pm to GamecockAlum
quote:But you now agree, more than 40 million Americans knew who he was?
That's not even Domestic blockbusters status.
Posted on 3/7/11 at 4:49 pm to Baloo
quote:
And 38.9 million people watched the Oscars that year. Meaning they knew Heath Ledger was in Brokeback, at least by the end of the broadcast.
Nielsen numbers aren't the most accurate thing out there. Even if they were, do you think those people remembered who was nominated for best actor? Hell of your head do you remember who all was nominated for best actor in say... 2006? 2007? I don't (not that I give a damn about The Oscars anyways).
Posted on 3/7/11 at 4:50 pm to Baloo
quote:
then why did you bring up its business? Of course you were attempting to use the movie's gate as an indication of its quality.
No I was not. The guy said the movie was a colossal fail. Making a shitton of money = not a colossal fail. He may not like the movie but to say it was a colossal fail is retarded.
Posted on 3/7/11 at 4:51 pm to GamecockAlum
quote:THE movie that year for the oscars was Brokeback, it was ingrained in everyone's head that Ledger was playing a gay cowboy, and it was widely acclaimed. sure, they don't care about who was nominated, but they know who played the biggest role in the most controversial movie that year.
Nielsen numbers aren't the most accurate thing out there. Even if they were, do you think those people remembered who was nominated for best actor? Hell of your head do you remember who all was nominated for best actor in say... 2006? 2007? I don't (not that I give a damn about The Oscars anyways).
Also, the younger audiences knew heath ledger, hell he was in a few movies targeted for teens before...10 things i hate about you, a knight's tale, etc.
Posted on 3/7/11 at 4:53 pm to Baloo
quote:
ONE: Why don't you like thinking? Or, more accurately, how is thinking not entertaining?
ONE: I have ADD. I do enough random thinking on my own that I don't need a movie to get the ball rolling on my thought train.
quote:
TWO: If you don't like analysis of films, what are you doing on message board devoted to analysis of films?
I'd rather not go to a board that just had a circlejerk of the same opinion. That'd get boring and redundant after a few hours.
Posted on 3/7/11 at 4:57 pm to The Egg
Ledger in Knight's Tale made girls' panties drop. I guarantee you every girl who is now of the age 24-35 has seen that movie. I'm a guy and like the movie. It's not just about Brokeback Mountain, which definitely put him on the radar as a serious actor, rather than more comedic roles.
And I understand that Monster's Ball was not comedic ***SPOILERS***
but how long was he even in the movie? 5 minutes?
Ledger was well known before TDK. Just accept that and argue something else.
And I understand that Monster's Ball was not comedic ***SPOILERS***
but how long was he even in the movie? 5 minutes?
Ledger was well known before TDK. Just accept that and argue something else.
Posted on 3/7/11 at 4:57 pm to GamecockAlum
quote:I agree. But defend Bay on his merits. You seem to be rejecting the very premise of analysis. Which I not only reject, but think is self-defeating on a message board.
I'd rather not go to a board that just had a circlejerk of the same opinion. That'd get boring and redundant after a few hours.
Posted on 3/7/11 at 4:57 pm to indianswim
quote:
Ledger was well known before TDK. Just accept that and argue something else.
Posted on 3/7/11 at 4:59 pm to Flair Chops
quote:
But you now agree, more than 40 million Americans knew who he was?
No, because they didn't. It's not like it was the Super Bowl where the winner is touted for months afterwards.
Outside of A Knight's Tale, what blockbusters was he the star of? Yeah he was in the Patriot, but as a supporting actor who died what? About halfway through the movie? The Dark Knight was his first big role in a Big blockbuster. His name was everywhere when the movie came out (some of it had to do with his death, but most of it was because of his performance).
Look at it this way: Leonardo DiCaprio was in several movies before Titanic and some people knew him. However his name really didn't get big until Titanic was released. The Dark Knight was to Heath much like Titanic was to Leo.
Posted on 3/7/11 at 4:59 pm to GamecockAlum
quote:
Nielsen numbers aren't the most accurate thing out there.
Ok now that's funny.
WE NEED A BETTER RATING SYSTEM
IF WE ARE GOING TO ACCURATELY DETERMINE HOW MANY PEOPLE WATCHED THE OSCARS.
Posted on 3/7/11 at 4:59 pm to GamecockAlum
quote:
GamecockAlum
Man, seriously?
You have very strange perpsective on movies and, for that matter, the movie business.
quote:
ONE: I have ADD. I do enough random thinking on my own that I don't need a movie to get the ball rolling on my thought train.
I have no doubt.
Posted on 3/7/11 at 5:00 pm to VOR
son of a bitch i love this thread
Posted on 3/7/11 at 5:01 pm to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
Ok now that's funny.
WE NEED A BETTER RATING SYSTEM
IF WE ARE GOING TO ACCURATELY DETERMINE HOW MANY PEOPLE WATCHED THE OSCARS.
Nielsen also said that only out of of every 3 Americans watched the Super Bowl. How many people do you know that didn't watch it? Every member of my family and every friend I know watched it. Yet supposedly 2 out of every 3 Americans didn't? Yeah I'ma go with bullshite on that.
Posted on 3/7/11 at 5:01 pm to GamecockAlum
quote:10 Things...
Outside of A Knight's Tale, what blockbusters was he the star of?
ETA Although, it might not qualify as a blockbuster. I don't know what it monetarily, but every female and half the males between the ages of 20-30 that I know personally have seen it.
This post was edited on 3/7/11 at 5:12 pm
Posted on 3/7/11 at 5:01 pm to GamecockAlum
okay, so we are arguing who got actors their first big blockbuster?
Posted on 3/7/11 at 5:03 pm to indianswim
quote:
Ledger was well known before TDK. Just accept that and argue something else.
I'm not saying the guy wasn't known before TDK by any means. I'm just saying that he wasn't a huge star until TDK. Shia LeBouf was known before Transformers and Indy 4, but he wasn't a star until after them.
Popular
Back to top


1







