- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 1923 is going to be fantastic!!!
Posted on 12/19/22 at 3:08 pm to MorbidTheClown
Posted on 12/19/22 at 3:08 pm to MorbidTheClown
It doesnt make sense with John II being Jack's son.
1. He was born in 1919 and we are already in 1923 and Jack and wife are just getting married.
2. Why would you skip a generation in the naming John 1 > Jack >john II? Makes more sense that Jack and John II are brothers right?
1. He was born in 1919 and we are already in 1923 and Jack and wife are just getting married.
2. Why would you skip a generation in the naming John 1 > Jack >john II? Makes more sense that Jack and John II are brothers right?
Posted on 12/19/22 at 3:13 pm to VinegarStrokes
quote:
Guessing she is the grandmother of Thomas Rainwater
Makes sense to set up the current conflicts.
Posted on 12/19/22 at 3:17 pm to GIbson05
quote:
2. Why would you skip a generation in the naming John 1 > Jack >john II? Makes more sense that Jack and John II are brothers right?
People do this all the time. Thats why his name is John II not John Jr.
Also John II would have to be John III's dad and the timing wouldn't work unless he was born a good bit later
Posted on 12/19/22 at 3:22 pm to GIbson05
quote:
1. He was born in 1919 and we are already in 1923 and Jack and wife are just getting married.
If you are getting 1919 from that family tree that was posted in this thread, I think that date is wrong. Again, I think the family tree is mostly correct but they already made one error by saying Claire was Margaret's sister, which she was not. I think the 1919 is also an error. I think John II will be conceived soon (if he wasn't already given the quip that Jacob made to Elizabeth's dad).
Posted on 12/19/22 at 3:26 pm to VinegarStrokes
quote:
. I think the 1919 is also an error. I think John II will be conceived soon (if he wasn't already given the quip that Jacob made to Elizabeth's dad).
Posted on 12/19/22 at 3:27 pm to VinegarStrokes
James Dutton was confirmed the great great grandfather
Which means John I is the great grandfather. Which means Jack is the grandfather
quote:
However, all that speculation can be put to bed since Tim McGraw himself has confirmed it.
According to CinemaBlend, Tim says he plays the great-great-grandfather of John Dutton in the bonus Blu-ray content:
“I play John Dutton’s great-great-grandfather. Our family is the first to discover Yellowstone and settle it. And in doing that, we are the first to really defend it and fight people off, and try to establish it and then survive.
Which means John I is the great grandfather. Which means Jack is the grandfather
This post was edited on 12/19/22 at 3:29 pm
Posted on 12/19/22 at 3:29 pm to pbro62
Any this targeted to suburban chardonnay moms like the other two?
Posted on 12/19/22 at 4:09 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Which means John I is the great grandfather. Which means Jack is the grandfather
Yes, I know. I already said as much
Posted on 12/19/22 at 6:21 pm to VinegarStrokes
The original title was 1932 and later changed to 1923 because of war dates.
Posted on 12/19/22 at 6:29 pm to pbro62
My mind is blown.
Speaking of Clarie Dutton from 1883:
Sarah Atwood:
Speaking of Clarie Dutton from 1883:
Sarah Atwood:
Posted on 12/19/22 at 8:17 pm to SaintEB
I hope we get some flash backs to the 1883 time. I want to see how James actually set the ranch up, got his first cow, how he died (we saw a little in the show).
Posted on 12/20/22 at 3:06 am to GIbson05
Maybe it is me, maybe some anti-YellowStone bias but I found the first episode slow and uninteresting. I found all of 1883 slow as well and only finished it because I hoped it would get better.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 7:21 am to SaintEB
quote:
My mind is blown.
i figure if they can ugly up Charlize, they can ugly up anyone.
also, the mole? She can't afford to have that removed?
Posted on 12/20/22 at 10:46 am to GIbson05
quote:
I hope we get some flash backs to the 1883 time. I want to see how James actually set the ranch up, got his first cow, how he died (we saw a little in the show).
I do too. I wish they did a 2nd season of 1883 to show how James established everything. Jacob mentioned in 1923 that he has been there since 1894. He came a year later after James died. I think there was a great opportunity to continue the 1883 storyline up to that point.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 4:32 pm to CobraCommander83
I don’t know what role John Dutton II has played so far or if he has been in Yellowstone, but based only on the picture included in those family trees and the basic premise of the show, he should have been played by Robert Duvall.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 4:43 pm to SaintEB
Had no idea she was Lydia in Heroes. I kept thinking where did I see her before.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 5:49 pm to gameovergt
quote:
So far Africa story
Wish it had been the entire episode. Leopard vs. Man was a welcomed interlude to a cow vs. sheep grass-eating pissing match.
Posted on 12/20/22 at 7:38 pm to Hayekian serf
quote:
Assembly line show making
Must include one hot blonde
Posted on 12/21/22 at 7:49 am to Falco
I found the episode a little slow (until the end), but chalk it up to development and foundation of characters, etc. so I will press on.
My SO had enough during the Indian scene and left to watch something else. Said he could not get into it. Neither of us felt that way about 1883 at any point.
Yellowstone itself has become guilty pleasure TV for both of us. (I read that it was originally supposed to be a limited series, which explains a lot.)
My SO had enough during the Indian scene and left to watch something else. Said he could not get into it. Neither of us felt that way about 1883 at any point.
Yellowstone itself has become guilty pleasure TV for both of us. (I read that it was originally supposed to be a limited series, which explains a lot.)
Posted on 12/24/22 at 10:27 am to Summerchild
Have this show a shot. I've never seen Yellowstone.
First episode was good. Now watching 1883.
I like period dramas, like BBC type stuff so this is pretty action packed for me.
Tim McGraw is a pretty good actor.
I see others don't like Elsa. I don't see the hate yet. I was thinking her and Ennis would start a family line. I like his character. About to start episode 5 now.
First episode was good. Now watching 1883.
I like period dramas, like BBC type stuff so this is pretty action packed for me.
Tim McGraw is a pretty good actor.
I see others don't like Elsa. I don't see the hate yet. I was thinking her and Ennis would start a family line. I like his character. About to start episode 5 now.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News