- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: WNBA & liberal media are going to be really disappointed when Clark doesn’t “save” WNBA
Posted on 2/28/24 at 12:40 pm to TackySweater
Posted on 2/28/24 at 12:40 pm to TackySweater
I am sure the WNBA viewership will go up due to Clark but not as much as they would like.
She can’t save the league. The NBA is saving the WNBA by giving them money otherwise the WNBA is bankrupt ten years ago.
She can’t save the league. The NBA is saving the WNBA by giving them money otherwise the WNBA is bankrupt ten years ago.
0
Posted on 2/28/24 at 12:54 pm to TackySweater
WNBA needs about 100 Clark level talents to become even marginally interesting.
Posted on 2/28/24 at 12:58 pm to TackySweater
quote:
Why would you think I’m triggered by the WNBA?
You seem to be lololololol
Posted on 2/28/24 at 1:03 pm to TackySweater
I don't get the want to bash Clark. She seems like a decent enough chick that plays an exciting brand of women's basketball.
Posted on 2/28/24 at 1:18 pm to Jcorye1
Lsu fans oddly don't like her because their own player acted like an obnoxious jackass to her. Random people and the media probably don't like her because she's white and homely looking
Posted on 2/28/24 at 1:19 pm to TackySweater
quote:My thought is I 100% agree with you.
WNBA & liberal media are going to be really disappointed when Clark doesn’t “save” WNBA
But if you told me that a women's college basketball game would have better ratings than the NBA Conference Finals and come very close to the NBA Finals ratings, I also would have agreed with you and been wrong.
And Clark wasn't the sole reason, but she was a big reason that happened.
This post was edited on 2/28/24 at 1:55 pm
Posted on 2/28/24 at 1:25 pm to TackySweater
Why do yall talk about this chick so much?
Posted on 2/28/24 at 1:43 pm to TackySweater
The snow flake race players would rather the league fail than Clark be the face of it.
They try to diminish her every game, point, interview.
Whitey bad
They try to diminish her every game, point, interview.
Whitey bad
Posted on 2/28/24 at 1:47 pm to TackySweater
quote:
They are already talking about how “Clark is what the wnba needs to save itself.”
I mean, they aren't wrong per se.
The WNBA lacks recognizable star power. Clark at least gives them a semblance of that.
She and Reese are the reason women's CBB has gained popularity/attention over the last year.
Now, will Clark and Reese make the WNBA comparable to the other major sports? No, but adding them certainly doesn't hurt.
quote:
They want it to happen so so so bad because then womens sprots will finally be equal.
I would want it to happen as well. Would be another sport to entertain people. Sounds like you want it to fail for political reasons as much as they want it succeed.
Also, how many "lololoollooollolollll" do we need to put in our posts if we are over the age of 14?
Posted on 2/28/24 at 1:59 pm to bigberg2000
quote:especially since the liberals want men competing against women
women in sports is “liberal” is fricking stupid.
Posted on 2/28/24 at 2:07 pm to TackySweater
quote:Pet peeve
Caitlin is dominate
Posted on 2/28/24 at 2:28 pm to TackySweater
Is Clark really THAT much better of a college player than Kelsey Plum was?
Plum barely moved the needle for interest in the WNBA.
Plum barely moved the needle for interest in the WNBA.
Posted on 2/28/24 at 2:35 pm to timbo
quote:
Why would you think I’m triggered by the WNBA?
You started this fricking thread.
I’m not the OP, but this is an idiotic post. By this definition if I ever post about any organization in the world to laugh at them, that means I’m obsessed?
Posted on 2/28/24 at 2:47 pm to TackySweater
"Clark is going to experience sexism and racism. She's white and not a lesbian. They'll try and run her out of the league." - Jason Whitlock.
Posted on 2/28/24 at 2:47 pm to TackySweater
quote:
Frankly I just don’t see how she wouldn’t permanently alter the viewership levels and fan interest at the next level.
As more young girls take basketball seriously we will see an influx of higher skilled ball players go on to the WNBA. Who knows, maybe one day they'll have 4 really competitive teams at once. But that won't pull the male viewership numbers up enough to really move the needle. I do believe Clark and Reese will bring some new interest to the league but it won't magically bring a profit.
Posted on 2/28/24 at 3:00 pm to Jones
quote:
You seem to be lololololol
I mean. I guess. Strange way to read a post but ok. Nice 12yr old lololol
Posted on 2/28/24 at 3:01 pm to Jones
quote:
Lsu fans oddly don't like her because their own player acted like an obnoxious jackass to her.
I’m not a Reese fan
Posted on 2/28/24 at 3:02 pm to shel311
quote:
And Clark wasn't the sole reason, but she was a big reason that happened.
What were the other reasons besides Clark?
Was this the breaking the record game?
Posted on 2/28/24 at 3:04 pm to dcrews
quote:
The WNBA lacks recognizable star power. Clark at least gives them a semblance of that.
There’s a list as far back as the 90s of the next “recognizable start power” that was about to come take over the WNBA and it never happened.
This post was edited on 2/28/24 at 3:22 pm
Posted on 2/28/24 at 3:05 pm to xenythx
quote:
Is Clark really THAT much better of a college player than Kelsey Plum was? Plum barely moved the needle for interest in the WNBA.
No not really. She’s just the next savior in a long line.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News