Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Why Is Cal and Stanford in the ACC?

Posted on 12/2/25 at 8:42 pm
Posted by Boodis Man
Member since Sep 2020
7124 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 8:42 pm
Wtf? Blatant mockery and negligence of the sport...who allowed this to happen?
Posted by KCM0Tiger
Kansas City, MISSOURI
Member since Nov 2011
16980 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 8:43 pm to
They're both close to the ocean like the ACC
Posted by rpg37
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since Sep 2008
53654 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 8:51 pm to
They ARE in the ACC because the Pacific touches the Atlantic.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61166 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

Wtf? Blatant mockery and negligence of the sport...who allowed this to happen?


The Big 10 did this when they created that fake arse alliance w/the Pac 12 and ACC that was really just a secret plot to gather info to see who they could steal away.
Posted by thegambler
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2012
2029 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 8:54 pm to
$$$$$$
Posted by JimTiger72
Member since Jun 2023
15978 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 8:55 pm to
quote:

the ACC?


The All Coast Conference?

Now let’s discuss SMU
Posted by Deplorableinohio
Member since Dec 2018
7150 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 9:23 pm to
Because it doesn’t matter and nobody else wants them.
Posted by Suntiger
STG or BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
35505 posts
Posted on 12/3/25 at 5:43 am to
Because college football is broken and nobody is trying to fix it anytime soon.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170583 posts
Posted on 12/3/25 at 6:10 am to
quote:

Because college football is broken and nobody is trying to fix it anytime soon.

It's beyond stupid how we went away from at least some idea of regionality to the conferences

Posted by West Seattle Dude
West Sesttle
Member since Aug 2023
456 posts
Posted on 12/3/25 at 8:10 am to
The only advantage of having Cal and Stanford in the ACC is for bragging rights when it comes to academics.
Posted by Clashmore Mike
Member since Oct 2014
1074 posts
Posted on 12/3/25 at 9:54 am to
When USC, UCLA, Washington and Oregon left the Pac 12 for the BIG 10, Cal and Stanford were left out. They could have stayed with Oregon State and Washington State in a very weak PAC 12.

Instead they looked for a home in the other Power 4 conferences. The ACC needed to expand to match the SEC and BIG 10. Since both Stanford and Cal are very competitive in non-football sports and are both very good Academically, it was a good match between these schools and the ACC. These teams, along with SMU, give the ACC a national footprint.
Posted by nick__21
Member since Jan 2020
306 posts
Posted on 12/3/25 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

Why Is Cal and Stanford in the ACC?


because people running colleges are incompetent retards
Posted by TouchedTheAxeIn82
near the Apple spaceship
Member since Nov 2012
6967 posts
Posted on 12/3/25 at 6:17 pm to
quote:

When USC, UCLA, Washington and Oregon left the Pac 12 for the BIG 10, Cal and Stanford were left out. They could have stayed with Oregon State and Washington State in a very weak PAC 12.

My understanding is that the B1G presidents were perfectly happy to add Cal and Stanford, for the obvious academic reasons. But Fox said they would not pay any additional money if those two were added. Of course no one wants to dilute the pot, so that's what killed it.


quote:

Instead they looked for a home in the other Power 4 conferences. The ACC needed to expand to match the SEC and BIG 10. Since both Stanford and Cal are very competitive in non-football sports and are both very good Academically, it was a good match between these schools and the ACC. These teams, along with SMU, give the ACC a national footprint.

Also I think the idea was that the ACC wanted to add teams in case the ones suing to leave the conference were successful. They needed the numbers to keep the conference viable.
Posted by ChanceOfRainIsNever
Far from Louisiana
Member since Oct 2016
2755 posts
Posted on 12/3/25 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

Why Is Cal and Stanford in the ACC?


Greed due to TV money
Posted by Rhodesia
Member since May 2025
33 posts
Posted on 12/3/25 at 10:09 pm to
quote:

Now let’s discuss SMU

ACC said frick geography when they added Louisville and Pitt and ND in all the other sports.
Posted by tigerfan84
Member since Dec 2003
25800 posts
Posted on 12/3/25 at 10:31 pm to

quote:

ACC


Posted by BamaDude06
GOATville20
Member since Jan 2007
3694 posts
Posted on 12/3/25 at 10:48 pm to
quote:

Now let’s discuss SMU


They paid $200 million and forfeited all media rights revenue for 9 years.
Posted by nick__21
Member since Jan 2020
306 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 7:43 am to
quote:

They paid $200 million and forfeited all media rights revenue for 9 years.


crazy since the ACC lasting 9 years is 50/50 at best
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
53625 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 9:06 am to
quote:

crazy since the ACC lasting 9 years is 50/50 at best


Let’s just say the clock is ticking any time big brands are getting less than they could nowadays… it won’t be long before that GOR is worthless
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram