- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: We should stop allowing nerds and people who hate sports to be decision makers in sports
Posted on 2/1/26 at 12:02 pm to nola tiger lsu
Posted on 2/1/26 at 12:02 pm to nola tiger lsu
It’s nice to be outside in decent weather. It sucks in rain and freezing cold. I stand by that remark…
Posted on 2/1/26 at 12:12 pm to VOR
quote:
It’s nice to be outside in decent weather. It sucks in rain and freezing cold. I stand by that remark…
100%.
Football weather is 65 degrees and sunny as far as I'm concerned. Most of the people who say that football was meant to be played in sub-zero temperatures have never sat in those conditions for four hours at a time. As someone who has sat at a Broncos game where the temperature hovered around 18 degrees for much of the contest, I can tell you I'd have rather that game been played in a dome.
This post was edited on 2/1/26 at 12:15 pm
Posted on 2/1/26 at 12:20 pm to grizzlylongcut
Off-season filler, owners would never let that happen
Posted on 2/1/26 at 12:33 pm to grizzlylongcut
This is a tough call for the home teams. These cold weather cities need domed stadiums. Playing important games in those conditions these days is wrong. Sorry about your tradition.
Posted on 2/1/26 at 12:46 pm to forkedintheroad
quote:Dumb conditions like heavy snow only contribute to randomness. In a test of skill, why would anyone want to MAXIMIZE randomness?
Why can't the better team win in conditions that affect both teams equally?
All randomness does is introduce noise that obscures who is more skilled.
Posted on 2/1/26 at 12:58 pm to StringedInstruments
quote:
So when you and your friends sit around and talk about how no one watches the NFL anymore yet somehow they get higher ratings, know that it’s people you absolutely do not identify with that are filling the coffers.
The NBA has gone this route. Their target demographic is young guys that embrace a certain culture and live on X looking for a dunk or 35 foot 3.
Posted on 2/1/26 at 1:01 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
Any new dome should be retractable roof and they shouldn't be allowed to have the roof closed unless having it open is dangerous to players or fans (lightning, subzero temperatures, or temperatures over 95).
Jerry was the first one to do the retractable roof and he never has it open. Same with the Rangers ball field.
Posted on 2/1/26 at 1:11 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
Football weather is 65 degrees and sunny as far as I'm concerned. Most of the people who say that football was meant to be played in sub-zero temperatures have never sat in those conditions for four hours at a time. As someone who has sat at a Broncos game where the temperature hovered around 18 degrees for much of the contest, I can tell you I'd have rather that game been played in a dome.
Do any of the cold weather outdoor stadiums have trouble getting asses in seats?
Posted on 2/1/26 at 1:12 pm to grizzlylongcut
quote:
Do any of the cold weather outdoor stadiums have trouble getting asses in seats?
Do any of the cold-weather dome stadiums have trouble getting asses in seats? If you build it, they will come.
Posted on 2/1/26 at 1:32 pm to grizzlylongcut
Terrible idea, but don’t be surprised when it happens. The NFL doesn’t need anybody at the games, it’s all TV revenue. They’ll play the game in an empty stadium as long as people tune in. These leagues don’t give a frick about the fans.
Posted on 2/1/26 at 1:34 pm to magildachunks
quote:Unfortunately it doesn’t appear to be going anywhere. NFL and these other leagues out there stuffing as much gambling ads as they can everywhere
The main culprit is gambling. Take that shite out of the equation and all these stupid changes go away
This post was edited on 2/1/26 at 1:34 pm
Posted on 2/1/26 at 1:45 pm to Cosmo
quote:
Eh. I kinda agree its dumb that you play 17 games then a championship game in god awful conditions that dont allow for the better team to win and also produce a shitty game
I disagree that it produces a shitty game. I love “weather” games.
Posted on 2/1/26 at 2:03 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
Dumb conditions like heavy snow only contribute to randomness. In a test of skill, why would anyone want to MAXIMIZE randomness?
All randomness does is introduce noise that obscures who is more skilled.
I disagree.
The randomness/noise is equally distributed. It doesn't favor one team over the other.
In high noise environments, traits other than raw physicality have heightened importance: mental fortitude, toughness, intelligence. Balanced teams should not neglect these traits.
Who is more skilled is an incredibly broad question, and the weather doesn't change the answer: it just reveals other skills that often go overlooked.
Posted on 2/1/26 at 2:56 pm to Cosmo
quote:
. I kinda agree its dumb that you play 17 games then a championship game in god awful conditions that dont allow for the better team to win and also produce a shitty game
The better team will adapt to the conditions. If they can't then they are not the better team.
Posted on 2/1/26 at 3:39 pm to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
What a weak attempt to create 2 mini Super Bowls.
There are cities that would love it.
NOLA would want it probably every year instead of the Super Bowl (except for maybe every 10 years). Cities are learning that the Super Bowls don't actually boost the city economy. But, AFC/NFCCGs would because it would actually be fans traveling in and spending money in those cities as vacations.
That being said, it would go over like a ton of bricks with the fans.
Posted on 2/1/26 at 3:41 pm to OvertheDwayneBowe
Yea it’s gambling, the only thing they can’t control is the weather! So they want to take that out of the equation.
Posted on 2/1/26 at 4:00 pm to forkedintheroad
quote:By definition, increased randomness pushes outcomes towards 50/50. In the extreme (infinite randomness) all outcomes are equally likely.
I disagree.
The randomness/noise is equally distributed. It doesn't favor one team over the other.
Posted on 2/1/26 at 4:12 pm to OvertheDwayneBowe
quote:
But, AFC/NFCCGs would because it would actually be fans traveling in and spending money in those cities as vacations.
For a short while. Then it will quickly get taken over with corporate types, just like the big name bowls have.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:05 am to jonboy
quote:
Its women; the more they get involved in sports the more they complicate & ruin shite.
That would fall under the "people who hate sports" category.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 2:32 pm to StringedInstruments
quote:
when you and your friends sit around and talk about how no one watches the NFL anymore yet somehow they get higher ratings, know that it’s people you absolutely do not identify with that are filling the coffers.
quote:
Those of us who grew up playing football and watching NFL Films with Steve Sabol? We’re not even considered.
We’ve been replaced by the 67,000,000 more people in the US since 2000~
Popular
Back to top



1








