Started By
Message

re: VIDEO: Tony Stewart hits opposing driver; driver has died according to reports

Posted on 8/10/14 at 1:48 am to
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128843 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 1:48 am to
quote:

whether it happens all the time or not, running into traffic is not a smart idea


I agree.

It is not the only variable under consideration.
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
52283 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 1:48 am to
quote:

you don't need any intent for manslaughter or negligence, all about a reckless disregard for human life. an argument could be made that was pretty freaking reckless.



Well the kid doesn't get hit if he doesn't get 5 inches from a race car
Posted by Cap Crunch
Fire Alleva
Member since Dec 2010
54189 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 1:48 am to
Other than Stewart seeing him and accelerating near him when everyone else went around him?
Posted by RummelTiger
Official TD Sauces Club Member
Member since Aug 2004
93629 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 1:48 am to
quote:

I won't say he deserved it, but he was fricking stupid doing what he did



Here's my only point on the kid walking down the track...

All of us think it's nuts because we've never done it, but these guys have been on tracks their entire lives and have likely done something like that numerous times, so it's not as big of a deal.

Also, if the guy who hit him was another young guy with little track experience, then maybe I could buy the nothing but an accident theory a little more. But I think we all know the experience Stewart has on the track...even a dirt track.
Posted by abellsujr
Member since Apr 2014
38455 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 1:49 am to
quote:

Well the kid doesn't get hit if he doesn't get 5 inches from a race car
This one will probably be talked about and debated for a long time.
Posted by maine82
Member since Aug 2011
3320 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 1:49 am to
quote:

...when he passed the kid, he purposefully accelerated in an attempt to freak the kid out. Unfortunately, he did more than that.


Unfortunately for Tony Stewart, that should be enough for an involuntary manslaughter charge, based on at least my reading of the law. Criminal negligence is all it takes.

Even if that's the only camera angle, the authorities probably have technology good enough to determine whether Stewart even made a slight move toward Ward, and while the steep swerve was clearly caused by Ward getting caught by the tire, it's also clear to me that he was trying to run away after playing the video several times.

Stewart's exact movement of his vehicle will determine what happens next.
Posted by tigerfan88
Member since Jan 2008
9033 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 1:49 am to
Exactly. Based on that video Ward was much more reckless than Stewart. And manslaughter would have to prove that Stewart intended to at least do something to the kid, even if he didn't mean to kill him. Again, it's very much like the Stallworth case
Posted by Cap Crunch
Fire Alleva
Member since Dec 2010
54189 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 1:49 am to
Exactly
Posted by LSUSoulja08
Member since Oct 2007
16969 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 1:49 am to
quote:

It is not the only variable under consideration


I agree, but the only thing we know for sure from what has been reported and what was shown in that video is that the kid ran at a moving car

you have no idea what Tony's intent was for anything. That's all conjecture and guess work at this point.
Posted by GEAUXmedic
Premium Member
Member since Nov 2011
42053 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 1:51 am to
quote:

Other than Stewart seeing him and accelerating near him when everyone else went around him?



like I said before, if someone was lunging at my car I would try to move away as quick as possible, its a natural human reaction. the kid got hit cause he got too close to the car. If you walk into a shooting range into the path that the bullets are flying and get hit who's fault is it?
Posted by UncleRuckus
Member since Feb 2013
10054 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 1:51 am to
How can you tell if stewart accelerated into the guy? I didn't see that in the video
Posted by Rebelgator
Pripyat Bridge
Member since Mar 2010
40186 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 1:51 am to
quote:

All of us think it's nuts because we've never done it, but these guys have been on tracks their entire lives and have likely done something like that numerous times, so it's not as big of a deal.


That's like saying because a guy in a sawmill juggled chainsaws during slow periods at work it's somehow safe for him to do because he worked around saws.

There's a reason drivers get fined for things like walking towards a car after a wreck. It's never safe no matter how much experience you have.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128843 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 1:51 am to
quote:

you have no idea what Tony's intent was for anything. That's all conjecture and guess work at this point.


Correct. But I'm going to guess that Tony is looking around desperately for a Way Back Machine right about now.
Posted by BayouBandit24
Member since Aug 2010
17180 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 1:51 am to
it really looks like what i'v heard from the very beginning

Tony tried to scare him lost control and clipped him. Still going to be in some deep shite regardless of the kids actions. A person in his position has to be held to a higher standard over stuff like this.
Posted by Zchlsu
Twin Peaks, Washington
Member since Jan 2011
7519 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 1:51 am to
I still don't see where it ses he has died yet, so hopefully he is still hanging in there.
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
69091 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 1:51 am to
quote:

have no idea what Tony's intent was


You're right. But different jurors will infer different things about him gunning the engine right before impact.
Posted by StripedSaint
Member since Jun 2011
2385 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 1:52 am to
quote:

Other than Stewart seeing him and accelerating near him when everyone else went around him?

He could claim that he accelerated to avoid him making contact with the car, trying to prevent him from being run over. He couldn't have turned right because it would be going towards him and he could turn left because his rear would sweep out.
Posted by harmonics
Mars Hotel
Member since Jan 2010
19148 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 1:52 am to
Would be amazing if the driver survives that. Even if he does, I don't see how he avoids some paralysis.
Posted by BayouBandit24
Member since Aug 2010
17180 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 1:52 am to
quote:

If you walk into a shooting range into the path that the bullets are flying and get hit who's fault is it?


derp
Posted by LSUSoulja08
Member since Oct 2007
16969 posts
Posted on 8/10/14 at 1:53 am to
quote:

All of us think it's nuts because we've never done it, but these guys have been on tracks their entire lives and have likely done something like that numerous times, so it's not as big of a deal.


I know what you mean but that doesn't change anything. A guy was fricking running at a moving cars. Whether that scares him or not makes no difference. It certainly doesn't make it a smart decision.

quote:

Also, if the guy who hit him was another young guy with little track experience, then maybe I could buy the nothing but an accident theory a little more. But I think we all know the experience Stewart has on the track...even a dirt track.


And you can talk about that until the cows come home. There is no hard evidence that proves he was trying to do anything other than drive his car

just my IMO on the matter though. And my opinion probably isn't worth a shite
Jump to page
Page First 38 39 40 41 42 ... 165
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 40 of 165Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram