Started By
Message

re: Umpire C.B. Bucknor has six pitches overturned by ABS system

Posted on 4/1/26 at 3:52 am to
Posted by UncleRuckus
Member since Feb 2013
10042 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 3:52 am to
Holy shite! How do you get that wrong
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
24370 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 7:13 am to
Had to come back to this thread after seeing that play pop up

I don’t see how he isn’t suspended
Posted by CWS91
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2005
1192 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 7:42 am to
That's just horrible. Especially at the MLB level.

BTW those Brewers uni's are sweet!
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
91456 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 7:53 am to
Is he getting away with it because he isn’t white?

Why is he allowed to be so bad at his job?
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24205 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 8:06 am to
quote:

Personally I think anything within 1 in should not be overturned. Any sort of replay / automation should be for bad calls, not razor close calls.


I agree, and downvotes will flow. Even the computers won’t be 100% right. If it’s close, fricking swing.

If it’s close, don’t expect the call 100% of the time as a pitcher.

If it’s egregious, absolutely over turn it.
Posted by facher08
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
6082 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 8:20 am to
quote:

Even the computers won’t be 100% right.


The margin for error is 1/6th of an inch. If the compromise is the ball must be outside of the margin of error, I wouldn't be against that.

quote:

If it’s egregious, absolutely over turn it.


Now, we have to define what egregious means. Are we going to create the egregious zone now? Nah, we already have a strike zone, if the ball doesn't cross it, the pitcher needs to adjust.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
42264 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 8:25 am to
The announcer sarcastically adding “I can’t wait for him to take the plate tomorrow” was great.
Posted by Keyszer10
Member since Aug 2018
762 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 8:27 am to
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24205 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 8:30 am to
quote:

The margin for error is 1/6th of an inch. If the compromise is the ball must be outside of the margin of error, I wouldn't be against that.


First, the strike zone sounds like it’s pre calculated by the pre season measurements of a player.

Players stances could easily vary by multiple inches through the season
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
42264 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 8:32 am to
quote:

Players stances could easily vary by multiple inches through the season


Sucks for them. Standardize the zone for each player at the start of the season. That way the player has the same strike zone (inches above the plate) all season long and doesn’t have to change wha is and isn’t a strike for him.
Posted by AwesomeSauce
Das Boot
Member since May 2015
11453 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 9:01 am to
quote:

I do wish they could make it three dimensional where it’s over all five points of the plate.

With the way it is, a ball could break in or out of zone and be called wrong.


This is my only complaint about it. There are a lot of breaking pitches being overturned for being 0.1-0.3" out of the zone when there is a very good chance that ball would have been within the strike zone of a 3D model vs the 2d they use. Some of the overturns have been justified and certainly glad to see them corrected, but I'd say at least half of the ones I've seen overturned have been breaking balls that would have been confirmed via a 3D model.
Posted by facher08
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
6082 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 9:07 am to
quote:

This is my only complaint about it. There are a lot of breaking pitches being overturned for being 0.1-0.3" out of the zone when there is a very good chance that ball would have been within the strike zone of a 3D model vs the 2d they use. Some of the overturns have been justified and certainly glad to see them corrected, but I'd say at least half of the ones I've seen overturned have been breaking balls that would have been confirmed via a 3D model.


I wasn't aware of that. In this case, I'd rather the tech not be implemented at all until they can account for breaking pitches effectively. That's such a huge part of the game.
Posted by AwesomeSauce
Das Boot
Member since May 2015
11453 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 9:18 am to
I think there has to be a margin of error accounted for that would disallow a pitch to be overturned. The strike zone in the rulebook is based on real world 3D, having a system measuring within 0.1" that is only 2D to overturn calls that should stand is to appease the 'I kNoW bASeBalL bECauSe I PlAyeD' crowd that has never looked or had to study NFHS, OBR, or NCAA rules yet love to talk like they know the game like the back of their hand.
Posted by beauchristopher
Member since Jan 2008
73722 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 10:29 am to
quote:

I don't pay my REC dues just to have a fair, unbiased system.


That’s a great comment.
Posted by TTB
LA to L.A.
Member since Nov 2006
3308 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 11:25 am to
quote:




CSB: the craps player that said “Get it the f*ck out your eye you blind motherf*cker!” Is a friend of mine (Ty). He was my neighbor when I moved to Hollywood many moons ago. You might recognize him from CB4 and Con Air. Good dude. Big Saints fan.
Posted by winkchance
St. George, LA
Member since Jul 2016
6653 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 7:49 am to
Ump kinda did it to themselves when they were unable to notice framing or did not care.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram