Started By
Message

ULL Athletics lost over $8 Million in 2023

Posted on 1/23/24 at 10:36 am
Posted by msutiger
Shreveport
Member since Jul 2008
69597 posts
Posted on 1/23/24 at 10:36 am
LINK

quote:

University of Louisiana athletics operated at a $5.3 million deficit for fiscal year 2022, according to documents obtained by The Daily Advertiser.

Per an annual financial audit conducted by the state of Louisiana issued in late January, Louisiana athletics brought in $33 million in revenue between July 1, 2021, and June 30, 2022, while operating costs and expenses totaled $38.3 million.


This after losing 5.3 million in 2022

LINK

quote:

University of Louisiana athletics operated at a $5.3 million deficit for fiscal year 2022, according to documents obtained by The Daily Advertiser.

Per an annual financial audit conducted by the state of Louisiana issued in late January, Louisiana athletics brought in $33 million in revenue between July 1, 2021, and June 30, 2022, while operating costs and expenses totaled $38.3 million.



Over a $13 million deficit in a two year period.
Posted by PP7 for heisman
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2011
5310 posts
Posted on 1/23/24 at 10:38 am to
Hey at least someone called them the "University of Louisiana" though. That's all that really matters.
Posted by slappy dappy doo
Member since May 2021
381 posts
Posted on 1/23/24 at 10:39 am to
The worst piece of these reports is they rarely, if ever, account for the value of the national media/marketing exposure due to national vs. cable vs. online.

So when they say an athletic dept. or school "lost" that money, it's disingenuous.
Posted by LSUAlum2001
Stavro Mueller Beta
Member since Aug 2003
47121 posts
Posted on 1/23/24 at 10:40 am to
All hail Title IX!
Posted by msutiger
Shreveport
Member since Jul 2008
69597 posts
Posted on 1/23/24 at 10:41 am to
Well ULM and Louisiana Tech manage to not include that and maintain close to a balanced budget in these same reports.
Posted by danilo
Member since Nov 2008
20064 posts
Posted on 1/23/24 at 10:42 am to
quote:

The worst piece of these reports is they rarely, if ever, account for the value of the national media/marketing exposure due to national vs. cable vs. online. So when they say an athletic dept. or school "lost" that money, it's disingenuous.

Schools also justify sports (especially football) as a fundraising tool. May be difficult to quantify that was well.
Posted by Domeskeller
Member since Jun 2020
7771 posts
Posted on 1/23/24 at 10:43 am to
Depends on the school. Sometimes, an operating loss is just that. Not saying it is in this case.

I will say people can make accounting paint the story they want. If you’re anti-athletics, easy to say they lost $8 million. If you’re pro-athletics, easy to say it’s partly a marketing/fundraising/enrollment expense.
This post was edited on 1/23/24 at 10:47 am
Posted by Wayne Campbell
Aurora, IL
Member since Oct 2011
6365 posts
Posted on 1/23/24 at 10:47 am to
quote:

The worst piece of these reports is they rarely, if ever, account for the value of the national media/marketing exposure due to national vs. cable vs. online.

So when they say an athletic dept. or school "lost" that money, it's disingenuous.


Don't you usually spend money on marketing to drive increased revenue? I would think spending an excessive amount for "exposure" to the point of running a deficit is not good business practices.
Posted by msutiger
Shreveport
Member since Jul 2008
69597 posts
Posted on 1/23/24 at 10:52 am to
Here is my problem with it. Skip Holtz’ roster talent fell off of a cliff because Louisiana Tech couldn’t afford to pay COA (cost of attendance aka a stipend to scholarship athletes) while our peers could.

Meanwhile the Cajuns are still paying full COA while Louisiana Tech pays about 50% because that is all we can afford.

Two in-state schools in the same system playing by different rules. It’s bullshite.
Posted by BlueWaffleHouse
LA
Member since Jul 2012
1846 posts
Posted on 1/23/24 at 10:56 am to
quote:

will say people can make accounting paint the story they want. If you’re anti-athletics, easy to say they lost $8 million. If you’re pro-athletics, easy to say it’s partly a marketing/fundraising/enrollment expense.


A title reading: “UL spent $8 million on national marketing as the athletic department breaks even.” …. Paints an entirely different picture for sure
Posted by BlueWaffleHouse
LA
Member since Jul 2012
1846 posts
Posted on 1/23/24 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Don't you usually spend money on marketing to drive increased revenue? I would think spending an excessive amount for "exposure" to the point of running a deficit is not good business practices.


You would need other metrics to go with the “spending” point for exposure. - Did enrollment increase? Increased licensed merchandise profits? Etc… All much harder to quantify, but not impossible.
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
21856 posts
Posted on 1/23/24 at 11:00 am to
This isn't surprising. Most schools who aren't in P5 conferences lose money on athletics. 10 years ago, only a handful of athletic departments in the country turned an overall profit. A lot more do now because of how much more valuable the recent TV media rights deals have been for the power conferences. But G5 schools mostly all lose money on athletics.

Link below shows who makes what. And keep in mind that the "total allocated" column is money that the athletic department counts as part of their revenue but in reality is coming from student fees or other money from university funds. Smaller programs are getting the majority of their athletic funding from the school directly as opposed to media rights, ticket sales, or gameday revenues.


USA Today - NCAA athletics revenue/expense by school
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
29365 posts
Posted on 1/23/24 at 11:51 am to
quote:

University of Louisiana

I found your problem. People sending money to the wrong university.
Posted by Baers Foot
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns
Member since Dec 2011
3541 posts
Posted on 1/23/24 at 11:51 am to
quote:

msutiger


Click for help
Posted by More beer please
Member since Feb 2010
45044 posts
Posted on 1/23/24 at 12:16 pm to
And those idiots think they should be respected more
Posted by Ralph_Wiggum
Sugarland
Member since Jul 2005
10666 posts
Posted on 1/23/24 at 12:17 pm to
If they are losing that amount of money they need to drop down to Division III. They can be a DIII power and win all sorts of championships when the title games are on ESPN 8 they can be branded "Louisiana"
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34611 posts
Posted on 1/23/24 at 12:29 pm to
Flagship, though.
Posted by LSUTIGERS8181
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2012
9989 posts
Posted on 1/23/24 at 1:52 pm to
Shut that trash university down
Posted by ImJustaBoy
Member since Oct 2023
522 posts
Posted on 1/23/24 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

Shut that trash university down

Have you stepped foot in a LSU classroom lately, or even the library. It’s honestly disgusting that the “Flagship” school of Louisiana is allowed to operate with the state of those buildings.
Posted by jcaz
Laffy
Member since Aug 2014
15548 posts
Posted on 1/23/24 at 3:52 pm to
Yeah there's been a hiring freeze in the A.D. for awhile. It's no surprise they have been losing money. They hired a garbage HC for less money and are now seeing the results.

I still can't believe they are renovating the stadium. Half of it is now demolished and it could stay that way and still be empty on game day.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram