Started By
Message

re: Tony Dungy

Posted on 8/23/10 at 11:14 am to
Posted by AlejandroInHouston
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2007
18776 posts
Posted on 8/23/10 at 11:14 am to
quote:

Yep. Especially the fact that he didn't raise his voice or curse. That took courage in the macho world of football.


Why is not raising your voice or not cursing something to admire? Who gives a shite?

Both of those traits are irrelevant to being an NFL coach.

It's like saying "he always wore a blue cap and he never shaved his mustache. That was really something."
Posted by AlejandroInHouston
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2007
18776 posts
Posted on 8/23/10 at 11:16 am to
nm - mos post below
This post was edited on 8/23/10 at 11:24 am
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36153 posts
Posted on 8/23/10 at 11:19 am to
I wish you would have quoted my sentence that followed... really don't like just that sentence taken alone without context

but anyway, there is a real secondary function of marriage with respect to family unit formation and children as well. And because that involves sex instead of race it's over-lapping but not equivalent
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 8/23/10 at 11:26 am to
quote:

You mean like those who say they hate the sin but love the sinner? I usually think those people are lying and homophobic (and/or in the closet themselves)


This. Sure, people like to focus on the actual sex rather than who a person is, and doing so is dishonest, at best--is a person who NEVER has sex in his or her life asexual, or is their sexuality determined by who they are attracted to? I (and science) say it's the latter. So to focus on the action of having sex is wrong, because if a gay person does the "right" thing and either abstains for the rest of his or her life, then he's causing harm to himself. If he does the other "right" thing, then he's hurting the other party in his marriage in part (and not the smallest part, by a long shot) because he is being dishonest with his partner, himself, and society.

So the people who claim to be be anti-gay but not homophobic are not only homophobic, but they are also something much more sinister.
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
62374 posts
Posted on 8/23/10 at 11:26 am to
Tony Dungy as a coach
Very good coach. He took the Tampa Bay Bucs, arguably the worst franchise in pro sports along with the New Orleans Saints and the Los Angeles Clippers, to great heights. They won division championships, they made 2 (I think) NFC Championship games, coming within a few minutes of beating the Greatest Show on Turf. The year he left, Jon Gruden comes in and wins the Super Bowl. I like Gruden, but this being Tigerdroppings, I'm sure we can easily compare that with another college coach inheriting a loaded program/franchise and winning big at first thanks to the previous coach. What has Tampa done since?? In Indy, he teamed with Peyton Manning, who has his own big game flop issues to deal with, and they did win a Super Bowl. I also believe that had Dungy's son not committed suicide just before the playoffs, the Colts would have won another Super Bowl the previous year. So in summary, Tony Dungy was a very good coach.
This post was edited on 8/23/10 at 12:07 pm
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 8/23/10 at 11:28 am to
Excellent coach, good role model in SOME areas, unabashed bigot in others.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36153 posts
Posted on 8/23/10 at 11:30 am to
In some ways Tony Dungy is kinda Reggie White light

He has better judgment than to go in front of the Wisconsin state legislature and spell out his racial theories tho... who knows maybe he too thinks native americans are good at sneaking up on people
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
62374 posts
Posted on 8/23/10 at 12:17 pm to
PoliBoard:

As for Tony Dungy the person
I'm behind him 100%. People on here are claiming that he hates gays, but I haven't once heard him advocate any violence or hurled insults at homosexuals. He campaigns against gay marriage, but I guarantee you he could sit down in a room with homosexual men and women and have a cordial discussion about the topic. I'm sure nobody would change their mind, but it doesn't mean that Dungy has hatred for each homosexual person. That would be like saying, "Tony Dungy campaigns against drinking and driving, therefore he hates all people who have ever been drunk behind the wheel."

As for separation of church and state, the original intent was to keep the state out of the church, not the other way around.
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 8/23/10 at 12:20 pm to
The people who are opposed to interracial marriage don't hate blacks, but wouldn't want their daughter dating a black guy, right?

As for your interpretation of the Wall of Separation, Thomas Jefferson disagrees with you in his writings, as does the Treaty of Tripoli.
This post was edited on 8/23/10 at 12:22 pm
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
62374 posts
Posted on 8/23/10 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

As for your interpretation of the Wall of Separation, Thomas Jefferson disagrees with you in his writings, as does the Treaty of Tripoli.


Possibly.

But I also refuse to think of Dungy as a bad father, even if the rumors in this thread were true. If I have a son that drops out of college and sells drugs for a living, I will do everything possible to help him live in a manner that would be appropriate with my family values. I will still love my son and support him 100%, but I would also be disappointed in his life choices.
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 8/23/10 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

But I also refuse to think of Dungy as a bad father,


Same here. Heck, even if what AIH says is true, that doesn't make Dungy a bad father because chances are, he would not have known his son were gay.

quote:

If I have a son that drops out of college and sells drugs for a living, I will do everything possible to help him live in a manner that would be appropriate with my family values. I will still love my son and support him 100%, but I would also be disappointed in his life choices.


Horrible analogy because people don't choose their sexual orientation.
Posted by Jamohn
Das Boot
Member since Mar 2009
13546 posts
Posted on 8/23/10 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

When Prop 8 goes to the SC, Loving v Virginia will be one of the decisions that will be a factor.
I'm not sure I agree w/ this. You may be right based on the Supreme Court lineup being what it is and Kennedy's swing vote being typically gay-friendly, but a Prop 8 ruling would significantly extend Loving v Virginia b/c the Supreme Court would be granting gays protection as a "Carolene Class," which it has never expressly done, and I'm honestly not sure that they fit based on the substantive requirements that a group must fit. Remember that the Lawrence v. Texas ruling regarding sodomy was not based on Equal Protection, only O'Connor's concurrence which nobody else signed onto was.
quote:

All people who oppose inter racial marriage are racist, just as all people who oppose gay marriage are anti gay.
I think that the logical connection is there, but I promise you that many people who oppose gay marriage don't see it that way. Some are actively pro-gay rights. But, to your point, there were many people (white, black, and yellow) in the '60s and even today who are pro civil rights for all races but oppose interracial marriages, so I understand your point.
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
62374 posts
Posted on 8/23/10 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

Horrible analogy because people don't choose their sexual orientation.


Some adult men's sexual orientation is young children, is that wrong?
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 8/23/10 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

Some adult men's sexual orientation is young children, is that wrong?


Besides the fact that most pedophiles are heterosexual, it's abundantly clear and scientifically shown that pedophilia is a mental disorder, while homosexuality is not.
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
62374 posts
Posted on 8/23/10 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

and scientifically shown that pedophilia is a mental disorder, while homosexuality is not.


Okay.

I'll end by with my original point that Tony Dungy was a good coach, and I believe a good mentor to many of his former players and coaches. I would listen to anything he had to say about football or life issues.

Also, I believe in the Bible and what it says. If the Bible is wrong, then I will have been misguided in my beliefs. However, I won't apologize for follwing its teachings, most importantly to love my neighbor as I love myself.
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 8/23/10 at 1:21 pm to
Fair enough.



Posted by PurpleandGold Motown
Birmingham, Alabama
Member since Oct 2007
22082 posts
Posted on 8/23/10 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

Some adult men's sexual orientation is young children, is that wrong?


Wow, way to use a tired old bullshite argument. Youa re comparing sexual intercourse between to consenting adults to the predation of a child molester?

Guess we know on what side of the fence you fall on.


As far as our founding Fathers attitude towards religion, they were Deists. They believed that there was a creator but it had long since left man to his own devices. They believed organized religion (most notably christianity) was a European cancer that should not be allowed to infect their young nation. See John Adams letters to Jefferson regarding staffing the University of Virginia.

Our country did not go wrong when we started to go away from religion. It went wrong when people became dependent upon it, and now we elect leaders based on their religious views rather than their individual competence. We make laws and inact policies based on the writings of a bunch of half mad ascetics living out in the desert.

Lunacy.

Oh well. To bring this back to topic, I'm tired of Tony Dungy's schtick. Just go home and read your Bible and try to find some level of comfort in your delusions.
Posted by Jamohn
Das Boot
Member since Mar 2009
13546 posts
Posted on 8/23/10 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

As far as our founding Fathers attitude towards religion, they were Deists.
That's a hell of a blanket statement that I think is wildly inaccurate. Jefferson took a lot of shite during his time for being a Deist and was accused of being a godless atheist.
quote:

Our country did not go wrong when we started to go away from religion. It went wrong when people became dependent upon it, and now we elect leaders based on their religious views rather than their individual competence.
I agree w/ this, to a degree but I'd say that nothing there is a modern phenomenon; it's been going on since the beginning. You really think people were smarter in the 1700's?
quote:

We make laws and inact policies based on the writings of a bunch of half mad ascetics living out in the desert.... Just go home and read your Bible and try to find some level of comfort in your delusions.
When you spout such degrading things about people's personal religious beliefs you are showing the same level of intolerance that you perceive is being shown homosexuals. That makes you part of the problem. As I said before, this is the ugly state of what passes for discourse in this country today and it completely stifles any hope for productive debate.
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
62374 posts
Posted on 8/23/10 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

When you spout such degrading things about people's personal religious beliefs you are showing the same level of intolerance that you perceive is being shown homosexuals. That makes you part of the problem. As I said before, this is the ugly state of what passes for discourse in this country today and it completely stifles any hope for productive debate.


Amen (pardon the pun)

I had some beliefs, Sophandros made some points that went against my views, I really didn't have solid to facts to contradict it other than faith. Therefore, I just acknowledged his points and will move on.
Posted by AlejandroInHouston
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2007
18776 posts
Posted on 8/23/10 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

Also, I believe in the Bible and what it says. If the Bible is wrong, then I will have been misguided in my beliefs. However, I won't apologize for follwing its teachings, most importantly to love my neighbor as I love myself.


And ignorant Muslims use this same stupid crutch regarding the Koran.

Congrats - you're akin to a Muslim in the Gaza Strip with your religious belief. You're just lucky you were born in America instead of the Middle East so that your parents indoctrinated you with Christianity instead of Islam. Roughly a 50/50 chance.
This post was edited on 8/23/10 at 1:57 pm
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram