The fundamental problem with this year's playoff and why change has to happen

Here's the thing. I friggin hate Bama. But, if I'm being honest with myself, I can make a "one of the best 4" argument for them being in.

But, it's a retarded argument because it's COMPLETLEY subjective. I can't "prove" it. I just "think" it.

I can also make a decent argument for why OSU should have been in. But, I hate that argument because for frick's sake, they got blown out by Iowa.

I can also make a decent UCF argument. But, that one sucks too because for Chrissake, the best team they beat all year was Memphis.

Basically, there were AT LEAST 3 teams vying for the 4th spot and even THAT is being charitable because frankly, Clemson wasn't all that this year either.

This year is exhibit A, B and C-Z of why the ONLY reason a committee should exist is to pick a couple of at large teams in a 6 or 8 team field.

My personal preference is to have 6 conferences(hey independents, join or be left out) Play 6 Conference title games. Then pick 2 Wildcards.

But, honestly, I don't think you can get the powers that be to add TWO weeks of football to the system. So, if that's the case then I think you have to simply go six conferences with 6 champs in. 2 get a bye.

Yes, this would result in seemingly lesser teams making it but that's really sort of normal in any sport and, besides, it's completely subjective.

I would rather unequal results in an OBJECTIVE no human error system than unequal results in this silliness.

I'm kind of hoping the powers in all of the NCAA are pissed as frick about an all SEC title game and it becomes the impetus for change.

But, I'm not holding my breath.