Started By
Message

re: The current SEC is unsustainable

Posted on 10/25/26 at 10:04 am to
Posted by Yeti_Chaser
Member since Nov 2017
14151 posts
Posted on 10/25/26 at 10:04 am to
It's great as is. Keep the big games and just fix the rankings. Make who you beat matter more than who you lose to. But that makes way too much sense
This post was edited on 10/25/26 at 12:30 pm
Posted by TigerBait2008
Boulder,CO
Member since Jun 2008
42082 posts
Posted on 10/25/26 at 10:09 am to
Never gonna happen
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
14486 posts
Posted on 10/25/26 at 10:27 am to
quote:

You make the playoffs with 9-3 or possibly 8-4

Not in a 12 team playoff.
Posted by Kato
Sec 102
Member since Nov 2006
3386 posts
Posted on 10/25/26 at 10:30 am to
Posted by HEtiger
Member since May 2008
2198 posts
Posted on 10/25/26 at 10:32 am to
Sankey= Biden
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
58768 posts
Posted on 10/25/26 at 10:43 am to
Why do you think Stanley and tenn and uga want to kick out lsu
Posted by 1999
Where I be
Member since Oct 2009
34956 posts
Posted on 10/25/26 at 10:44 am to
That is why they are going to 24 team playoff
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
25614 posts
Posted on 10/25/26 at 11:21 am to
quote:

Not in a 12 team playoff

Apologies if I was unclear, I mean with the landscape next year in the 24 team playoff.

The interesting question is whether the SEC should add two or four teams.

Adding UNC and UVA adds the mid-Atlantic while adding lower tier football schools.

Adding FSU and Clemson would be bringing in better football schools and cultural fits but they’re duplicative from a state standpoint and would be competitive programs that would be more competitive games to navigate annually.

And with four schools what do you do schedule wise? Pods?

Could end up with something like

POD 1:
UNC
UVA
USC
Clemson

POD 2:
AU
TN
VAN
Bama

POD 3:
TX
A&M
OU
MIZ

POD 4:
UGA
UF
FSU
UK

POD 5:
LSU
OM
MSU
ARK

So you’d have three games inside your pod and rotate six others H-H.

Otherwise it’s protected rivalries which doesn’t work because most teams don’t have 2-3 worth protecting.

Bama: AU/TN LSU?
UGA: UF/AU TN?
TX: OU/AM Ark?
UF: UGA/FSU TN?
AU: Bama/UGA LSU?
LSU: OM/Ark Bama?
OM: LSU/MSU

OU: TX
LSU: OM Bama?
MSU: OM Bama?
TN: Bama UgA? UF? Van?
USC: Clem ?
Van: TN?
UK: ?

UNC and UVA lose all their main rivals (Duke, NC ST, Va Tech etc) but FSU and Clemson would keep theirs outside of Miami.
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
15217 posts
Posted on 10/25/26 at 11:35 am to
quote:

They just expanded the playoffs to 24 teams. You are for sure going to have 9-3 SEC teams make it and the occasional 8-4 one if all four loses are close to top 20 SEC opponents.


You are going to have at least 8 SEC teams every year going forward. How the frick are you going to find more that 16 teams from elsewhere to fill the other spots? That means every SEC team with 3 or fewer losses will be in forever.
Posted by jmcwhrter
Member since Nov 2012
8279 posts
Posted on 10/25/26 at 11:38 am to
quote:

You are going to have at least 8 SEC teams every year going forward. How the frick are you going to find more that 16 teams from elsewhere to fill the other spots? That means every SEC team with 3 or fewer losses will be in forever


All by design

It will eventually just be a committee hand-picking what they think is the best TV match ups
Posted by vidtiger23
Member since Feb 2012
10851 posts
Posted on 10/25/26 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

I remember saying this about the PAC 12. The difference then is we won bowl games

Well then you were rerarded. The pac 12 was always a 2-4 team league. Never did they come close to having 8 teams win championships in 2 decades.
Posted by T1gerNate
Member since Feb 2020
5133 posts
Posted on 10/25/26 at 12:18 pm to
Used to be back in the day you took almost as much pride in winning the SEC as winning a natty. I think it is going to go back to that. The playoffs are largely dumb and gay, but the SEC is still violent and badass.
Posted by cascadia
Georgia
Member since Jan 2014
2775 posts
Posted on 10/25/26 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

Never did they come close to having 8 teams win championships in 2 decades


Yeah my school of thought then is the SEC fanbois thoughts now. It’s called denial
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
59842 posts
Posted on 10/25/26 at 2:26 pm to
Lane said this a year ago.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
56062 posts
Posted on 10/25/26 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

think it is going to go back to that. The playoffs are largely dumb and gay, but the SEC is still violent and badass.


Nah… if you win the SEC (it’s the best conference), you DAMN SURE better capitalize on that with a natty or we’re all gonna laugh at you
Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36893 posts
Posted on 10/25/26 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

Used to be back in the day you took almost as much pride in winning the SEC as winning a natty. I think it is going to go back to that. The playoffs are largely dumb and gay


Happy you found a great coping mechanism.
Posted by T1gerNate
Member since Feb 2020
5133 posts
Posted on 10/25/26 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

Happy you found a great coping mechanism.
I can't tell if you're an Ohio State or a Notre Dame fan. Notre Dame has not won anything of significance since Lou Holtz (LOL!) and just lost to Bringham Young. What I am saying is, Notre Dame is a joke. If you're an Ohio State fan, well, Ohio State has the same number of championships as LSU this century so I guess you have room to have an opinion. Sorry about Julian Sayin and losing to Arch Manning (LOL!).
Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36893 posts
Posted on 10/25/26 at 3:38 pm to
It doesn’t matter, just focus on winning the SEC Championship, that’s the only thing that matters now since 2022.
This post was edited on 10/25/26 at 3:40 pm
Posted by PP7 for heisman
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2011
11114 posts
Posted on 10/25/26 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

Yeah my school of thought then is the SEC fanbois thoughts now. It’s called denial

No your school of thought now is just stupid.

Bowl records tell you nothing in the playoff/opt out era.

Look at what conferences produce NFL players. That tells you far more than watching Michael Van Buren lead LSU play Houston in a bowl game.
Posted by cascadia
Georgia
Member since Jan 2014
2775 posts
Posted on 10/25/26 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

Look at what conferences produce NFL players. That tells you far more than watching Michael Van Buren lead LSU play Houston in a bowl game.


Just give it a few seasons to catch up with NIL era. This will then lean B1G just as well

Then you’ll find some new dumb argument I’m sure
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram