- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The "blue blood" nfl teams
Posted on 1/19/20 at 9:35 pm to BuckyCheese
Posted on 1/19/20 at 9:35 pm to BuckyCheese
Downvoted for posting facts. 
Posted on 1/19/20 at 10:05 pm to Jack Ruby
The Cleveland Browns franchise that became the Baltimore Ravens wouldn’t be a blue blood by fan support or support from the league, but they’re a very high quality franchise with a ton of history of winning. Being split across two cities and two names makes it seem non cohesive though
Ravens have 2 Super Bowls and 12 playoff appearances in little over 20 years
Browns between 45 and 95 had 8 championships and 27 playoff appearances in 50 years
Ravens have 2 Super Bowls and 12 playoff appearances in little over 20 years
Browns between 45 and 95 had 8 championships and 27 playoff appearances in 50 years
Posted on 1/19/20 at 10:31 pm to Buckeye Backer
quote:
So Green Bay, Chicago and New York can count theirs but the Browns can’t? Got it. The Browns have 8 championships and there’s nothing you can do to change that.
I'm not changing anything. 4 of those championships are not NFL championships (as you initially labeled them), but rather from something called the All American Football Conference that played only 4 years and had a whole 8 teams.
Green Bay, Chicago and the Giants championships are all NFL championships, not from some minor, defunct league.
You're using the Alabama and Minnesota methods for counting championships. Don't be upset when called on it.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 10:42 am to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
I would think the Redskins are right there with the Giants and Bears.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 10:52 am to Buckeye Backer
quote:
So Green Bay, Chicago and New York can count theirs but the Browns can’t?
No the browns can.
But since then, NOTHING
Posted on 1/20/20 at 10:59 am to Jack Ruby
Like it or hate it, the blue bloods are:
-Steelers
-Packers
-Cowboys
-Giants
-Steelers
-Packers
-Cowboys
-Giants
Posted on 1/20/20 at 11:00 am to AtlantaLSUfan
I can agree with that
Posted on 1/20/20 at 11:04 am to Buckeye Backer
quote:
People will laugh, but historically speaking, the Browns and the Lions are two of the most historic franchises in the NFL. They absolutley dominated the first 3 decades of the NFL. Most people don’t realize the Browns went to 11 championship games. They have 8 NFL championships. They’ve just never been to a Super Bowl....heartbreakingly close, but never been. The Browns are like 5-6th all time in HoF inductees and top 10 all time wins I belive too. Cleveland had 11 losing seasons from 49’-95’...since they’ve come back in 99’, they have 19 losing seasons in 21 years. It’s. sad what’s happened to the Browns and the Lions.
And then the browns moved to Baltimore and became the ravens, who have stayed pretty successful. The Browns of today are expansion team restart suckage. NFL/art Modell screwed cleveland.
This post was edited on 1/20/20 at 11:06 am
Posted on 1/20/20 at 11:05 am to Jack Ruby
Is a blue blood a team with a rich history (eg. Lions, bears and browns) or a team with a national fan base (Steelers, cowboys). Or combination of both (packers)?
Posted on 1/20/20 at 11:11 am to Buckeye Backer
quote:
People will laugh, but historically speaking, the Browns and the Lions are two of the most historic franchises in the NFL. They absolutley dominated the first 3 decades of the NFL. Most people don’t realize the Browns went to 11 championship games. They have 8 NFL championships. They’ve just never been to a Super Bowl....heartbreakingly close, but never been. The Browns are like 5-6th all time in HoF inductees and top 10 all time wins I belive too. Cleveland had 11 losing seasons from 49’-95’...since they’ve come back in 99’, they have 19 losing seasons in 21 years. It’s. sad what’s happened to the Browns and the Lions.
Technically, that franchise is Baltimore not Cleveland.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 11:14 am to denvertiger
quote:
dunno...pre-merger championships are cool but it’s kind of like Minnesota or Army claiming NC’s
The Browns are as much a blueblood as Michigan football is.
ETA - and that really holds true if you go with the Browns-Ravens instead of the lawsuit driven Browns-Browns.
This post was edited on 1/20/20 at 11:19 am
Posted on 1/20/20 at 11:14 am to Jack Ruby
The blue bloods of the NFL since they are the oldest teams.
Lions
Chicago
Green Bay
Giants
Cardinals
Lions
Chicago
Green Bay
Giants
Cardinals
This post was edited on 1/20/20 at 11:17 am
Posted on 1/20/20 at 11:20 am to BuckyCheese
quote:
I'd think 13 championships gets the Packers into the blue blood club...
lmao, IDGAF about nFL cHamPiONsHiPS when it was a bunch of white dudes playing each other and throwing the ball once every 50 snaps.
The Packers have won 4 Super Bowls, and only 2 since the 60s.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 11:55 am to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Browns, Lions and Giants all had 4 NFL championships prior to merger. If one is a blue-blood, all are blue-bloods.
Good argument for the Chiefs, due to their AFL work.
Good argument for the Chiefs, due to their AFL work.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 11:58 am to BuckyCheese
Yes. Plus the Steelers. Maybe Pat's.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 11:58 am to Buckeye Backer
quote:
The Browns have 8 championships and there’s nothing you can do to change that.
10 championships.
They won two Super Bowls after the franchise moved to Baltimore.
Posted on 1/20/20 at 12:00 pm to sms151t
quote:
The blue bloods of the NFL since they are the oldest teams.
So Rutgers is a blue blood of college football?
Posted on 1/20/20 at 12:39 pm to RollTide1987
They are of nobility since they started it and the definition also says that they've don't necessarily have to do anything of note or competence.
Strictly by definition, yes Rutgers is a blue blood. Read the definition of a blue blood.
Strictly by definition, yes Rutgers is a blue blood. Read the definition of a blue blood.
This post was edited on 1/20/20 at 12:40 pm
Posted on 1/20/20 at 12:48 pm to denvertiger
quote:
I dunno...pre-merger championships are cool but it’s kind of like Minnesota or Army claiming NC’s
When do we get to start using this logic with the Cowboys?
They haven't been relevant on the field since the Clinton presidency.
Popular
Back to top


0










