Started By
Message

re: Texas A&M to SEC talks heating up?

Posted on 1/26/11 at 12:17 pm to
Posted by GeauxTigersLee
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2010
4688 posts
Posted on 1/26/11 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

and how far is to Columbia or Knoxville from BR?

Knoxville - 10.5 hr
Columbia - 12 hr

LSU only plays at those schools once every six years since they're not in the same division.
This post was edited on 1/26/11 at 12:28 pm
Posted by derekinne
Afghanistan
Member since Jan 2009
5895 posts
Posted on 1/26/11 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

So much for actually being able to make a conference division road trip.

Posted by JEAUXBLEAUX
Bayonne, NJ
Member since May 2006
55375 posts
Posted on 1/26/11 at 12:33 pm to
Good Point
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45219 posts
Posted on 1/26/11 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

yes...I would love to poach some Big 12 teams and see Texas' next move.


They're going to wind up independent regardless of what happens.
Posted by SwatMitchell
Austin, TX
Member since Jan 2005
2329 posts
Posted on 1/26/11 at 12:49 pm to
Based purely on the #s ($$), these would be the 4 adds:

(with state rank, population, key city TV market rank and # of households):
Missouri (#18 6.0MM) - KC #32 941K & StL #21 1.3MM
North Carolina (#10 9.6MM)- Charlotte #24 1.15MM & Raleigh/Durham #26 1.11MM
Texas A&M (#2 25.1MM) - DFW #5 2.54MM, Hou #10 2.12MM & SA #37 830K
Virginia or VA Tech (#12 8.0MM) - DC #9 2.34MM

Adding Missouri, UNC, TX A&M, & UVA or VaTech increases the SEC footprint population base 83% (or 48.6MM) from the current 58.9MM to 107.5MM, while staying contiguous.

These are all decent basketball, baseball and academic adds too.
This post was edited on 1/26/11 at 12:52 pm
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
74719 posts
Posted on 1/26/11 at 1:37 pm to
frick that. leave it alone.

let A&M slither around and die for all I care. Have you people seen what they think about the SEC and LSU on texags?
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60998 posts
Posted on 1/26/11 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

Have you people seen what they think about the SEC and LSU on texags?


i sure as frick wouldn't want them judging us by the rant
Posted by Ball Gravy
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2008
2985 posts
Posted on 1/26/11 at 1:44 pm to
Ummm... people, for the most part, were pretty complimentary of the experience and envy the SEC success.

Yeah, some stereotypes were thrown out there, and there were some bad experiences, but I read that on the Rant as well.

(Insert any fanbase here) fans will bitch about the opponent after a game. It happens here a lot.
Posted by tiger perry
Member since Dec 2009
25668 posts
Posted on 1/26/11 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

i sure as frick wouldn't want them judging us by the rant


true.
Posted by Xenophon
Aspen
Member since Feb 2006
42733 posts
Posted on 1/26/11 at 1:49 pm to
i think the overwhelming majority in the SEC agree that A&M is a good fit.. and also, most want nothing to do with any other schools west of Arkansas and Louisiana, including Texas..

there are several good options to the east, of which UVA, VT, FSU and Clemson seem to be the favorites..
Posted by GeauxTigersLee
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2010
4688 posts
Posted on 1/26/11 at 1:58 pm to
I'm all for A&M, but leave Oklahoma, OK St, and Texas at the door.
quote:

UVA, VT, FSU and Clemson seem to be the favorites
I think Clemson, Georgia Tech, and FSU are the best fits. Not excited about Virginia or VT.

If one of the ACC teams leave for the SEC, it's going to be huge news.
Posted by RightKindaGuy
Member since Aug 2010
1197 posts
Posted on 1/26/11 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

They're going to wind up independent regardless of what happens


indeed, once they need to find a conference for their olympic sports---then HELLO football independence.
Posted by Ball Gravy
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2008
2985 posts
Posted on 1/26/11 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

indeed, once they need to find a conference for their olympic sports---then HELLO football independence.


Bingo!
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
87435 posts
Posted on 1/26/11 at 2:11 pm to
A&M would def be a HR. Missouri (STL) isn't too shabby either but the distance is a problem obviously.
Posted by tiger perry
Member since Dec 2009
25668 posts
Posted on 1/26/11 at 2:21 pm to
A&M and FSU or VT would be a home run IMO.
Posted by tiger perry
Member since Dec 2009
25668 posts
Posted on 1/26/11 at 2:23 pm to
My first choice is staying at 12 though.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
41488 posts
Posted on 1/26/11 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

I'm not a big fan of them or either Oklahoma school joining. I was hoping we would pick up Aggie and someone like UNC or VaTech, and go to a 9 game conference schedule.


The 9 game conference schedule has brutalized the PAC10
Posted by bigjuice56
Ponchatoula, LA
Member since Mar 2009
1142 posts
Posted on 1/26/11 at 2:26 pm to
SEC isn't going to expand in markets it already has a presence in. So let's end the talk about FSU, Clemson, and Georgia Tech.
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
39066 posts
Posted on 1/26/11 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

The 9 game conference schedule has brutalized the PAC10


Only because it's the only conference to do it (Big-12 is starting this year). If other conferences did the same thing, it would all equal out. Basically the Pac-10 screwed itself vis a vis everyone else for no apparent reason
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
178783 posts
Posted on 1/26/11 at 2:29 pm to
Can we trade rather than add? Like add OU, A&M, Mizzou, and Okie St. for Ole Miss, Miss St, S. Carolina, and Vanderbilt?
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram